2
$\begingroup$

Let $X$ be a finite-dimensional Banach space and $(x_i)_{i\in I}$ a net in $X$. Since every limited net in $X$ has a convergent subnet, it follows that $(x_i)_{i\in I}$ does not admits a convergent subnet if and only if $$ \liminf_{i\in I} \|x_i\|=+\infty.$$

I wonder if there is such a characterization (by means of the norms or differences of the $x_i$'s) for some class of infinite dimensional Banach spaces.

Is there a paper, survey or even a chapter of a book containing any properties on this type of net?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Originally asked on math.SE: Nets with no convergent subnets in Banach spaces $\endgroup$ – Martin Sleziak May 12 '17 at 4:56
  • $\begingroup$ Perhaps you mean a weak$^*$ convergent subnet? because a bounded net in $X$ may not converge, as pointed out in the answer below... $\endgroup$ – ARG May 15 '17 at 16:41
  • $\begingroup$ No, I didn't mean weak or weak* convergence. I'd like to know if there is any good property (maybe a characterization by means of the norms or distances between the net elements, or any other property). Like, once I heard that if the net is actually a sequence then it has a subsequence that is a schauder basis for some closed subspace of $X$ or something like that, but I don't know whether it is true. $\endgroup$ – André Porto May 15 '17 at 18:57
1
$\begingroup$

As I understand, your question is about the equivalence for infinite dimensional Banach spaces of the two following statements:

a. $(x_{n}) \mbox{ in } X$ admits a convergent subsequence

b. $\displaystyle\liminf_{n} \|x_{n}\|<\infty$

If so, the answer is no. Certainly, in the finite dimensional case a. $\Leftrightarrow$ b.. In the infinite dimensional case, a. $\Rightarrow$ b. but the converse is not true. Here a counter example: in $\ell_{2}$ take the sequence of the unitary vectors $(e_{n})$; we have $\liminf \|e_{n}\|=1<\infty$ but it does not admit any norm convergent subsequence because being $(e_{n})$ a weakly null sequence if a subsequence $(e_{n_{k}})$ were norm convergent it should be convergent to zero in the norm and this is not the case since $\|e_{n_{k}}\|=1$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ No, that's not what I meant. I knew that (a) does not characterize this kind of net. Maybe I should rephrase my question: "What good properties can I get from a net that has no convergent subnets?" $\endgroup$ – André Porto May 15 '17 at 18:27

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.