0
$\begingroup$

Consider the metric space $X = \mathbb{R}$, $\mathcal{B}$ the Borel $\sigma$-algebra on $\mathbb{R}$ and $\mu$ a probability measure on $X$. Let $A \in \mathcal{B}$ and $\tau_n \nearrow \infty$ a sequence of positive numbers.

I can't demonstrate that the following sequence of measures is or is not convergent in the weak topology: $$\frac{1}{\tau_n} \int_0^{\tau_n} \mu(A-t) dt.$$

Can someone help me?

Thank you!

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Hint: If $\mu_n$ is the measure you defined, can you show that $$\int f\,d\mu_n = \frac{1}{\tau_n} \int_0^{\tau_n} \int_{\mathbb{R}} f(x + t)\,\mu(dx)\,dt$$ for bounded continuous $f$? Then try Fubini and dominated convergence. $\endgroup$ Feb 11, 2017 at 17:42
  • $\begingroup$ I don't understand. Can you give me more details, please? Thank you! $\endgroup$ Feb 11, 2017 at 17:57
  • $\begingroup$ "Weak topology" in this context means different things to probabilists and analysts, so can you please state precisely which topology is meant? $\endgroup$ Feb 11, 2017 at 17:59
  • $\begingroup$ I want to verify if there is a measure $\mu^*$ such that $$(f, \mu_n) \to (f, \mu^*),$$ for $f$ bounded and continuous, where $(f, \mu)$ means $\int f d\mu$. $\endgroup$ Feb 11, 2017 at 18:03

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Let $\mu_n$ be the measure defined by $$\mu_n(A) = \frac{1}{\tau_n} \int_0^{\tau_n} \mu(A-t)\,dt.$$

In general, this sequence doesn't converge weakly. Suppose for instance that $\mu$ is a point mass at $0$. Then $\mu_n$ is the uniform probability measure on $[0, \tau_n]$. Let $f$ be any bounded, continuous, strictly positive, Lebesgue integrable function on $\mathbb{R}$ (for instance, $f(x) = e^{-x^2}$ would do). Then $$\int_\mathbb{R} f\,d\mu_n = \frac{1}{\tau_n} \int_0^{\tau_n} f(t)\,dt \le \frac{1}{\tau_n} \int_{\mathbb{R}} |f(t)|\,dt \to 0$$ as $\tau_n \to \infty$. Since each $\mu_n$ is a positive measure, if there is a weak limit $\mu^*$ it is also a positive measure. So this would force $\int f\,d\mu^* = 0$, which can only happen if $\mu^* = 0$.

But $\mu_n$ doesn't converge to 0 either; take $f=1$. So the sequence doesn't converge weakly at all.

If you had $\tau_n \to 0$ (which is how I originally misread the question) then $\mu_n \to \mu$ weakly:

  1. Verify that $\mu_n$ is indeed a measure (i.e. that it is countably additive). Use the monotone convergence theorem.

  2. For a bounded measurable function $f : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$, verify that $$\int_{\mathbb{R}} f\,d\mu_n = \frac{1}{\tau_n} \int_0^{\tau_n}\int_{\mathbb{R}} f(x+t)\,\mu(dx)\,dt.$$ Start with the case where $f=1_A$ is an indicator function, then do simple functions, then nonnegative measurable functions, then bounded measurable functions (the "standard mantra").

  3. Use Fubini's theorem to verify that $$\tag{*} \int_{\mathbb{R}} f\,d\mu_n = \int_{\mathbb{R}} \frac{1}{\tau_n} \int_0^{\tau_n}f(x+t)\,dt\,\mu(dx).$$

  4. For bounded continuous $f$, set $f_n(x) = \frac{1}{\tau_n} \int_0^{\tau_n}f(x+t)\,dt$. Use the continuity of $f$ to show that $f_n \to f$ pointwise, and the sequence is bounded by $\|f\|_\infty$.

  5. Use the dominated convergence theorem on (*) to show that $\int_\mathbb{R} f\,d\mu_n = \int_{\mathbb{R}} f_n\,d\mu \to \int_\mathbb{R} f\,d\mu$. Hence $\mu_n \to \mu$ weakly.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Hold on a minute! Surely the convergence is just to 0. If $f$ is any compactly supported function, then $|\int f(x+t)\,d\mu|<\epsilon$ for all $t$ outside a bounded range. $\endgroup$ Feb 12, 2017 at 9:08
  • $\begingroup$ @AnthonyQuas: Oh, I didn't read the question carefully and I was thinking of $\tau_n \to 0$. But note that $f$ is not assumed to be compactly supported. Let me look at this again when I have more time. $\endgroup$ Feb 12, 2017 at 15:47
  • $\begingroup$ I think this is convolution of a uniform probability measure on $[0,\tau_n]$ with $\mu$; this sequence isn't tight and converges to the 0 measure. $\endgroup$ Feb 12, 2017 at 20:54
  • $\begingroup$ @AnthonyQuas: In this topology, it doesn't converge to the zero measure; see above. (You might be thinking of the weak-* topology on $C_0(\mathbb{R})$.) $\endgroup$ Feb 12, 2017 at 21:45
  • $\begingroup$ OK. Your answer seems exactly right. $\endgroup$ Feb 15, 2017 at 9:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.