4
$\begingroup$

Let $\mathbb {\overline B}^n\subset \mathbb R^n$ be a closed unit ball in and let $\mathbb B^k\subset \mathbb R^k$ be a open unit ball.

Suppose $F$ is a smooth function on $\mathbb {\overline B}^n\times \mathbb B^k$ that has the following properties.

1) $F(x,y)$ tends to $-\infty$ when $|y|\to 1$ for $(x,y)\in \mathbb {\overline B}^n\times \mathbb B^k$.

2) For any $y_0\in \mathbb B^k$ the strict minimum of $F$ on the ball $\mathbb {\overline B}^n\times y_0$ is attained in the interior of the ball. (Here by strict I mean, that the minimum of $F$ on the boundary of $\mathbb {\overline B}^n\times y_0$ is larger than the minimum of $F$ over the whole ball.)

Question. Is it true that $F$ has a critical point $(x_0,y_0)$ in $\mathbb {\overline B}^n\times \mathbb B^k$ such that $F$ restricted on $\mathbb {\overline B}^n\times y_0$ has a minimum at $(x_0,y_0)$? If yes, I would like to know if there are some natural generalizations of this statement. If no, could one impose some additional conditions that guarantee a positive answer?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ When you say "strict minimum" does this imply that the minimum is attained at a single, unique point? $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 13, 2016 at 13:42
  • $\begingroup$ Jaap, thanks for your question. I only mean that the values of F on the boundary of the ball are larger than the minimum of F in the ball. I'll will adjust the question accordingly $\endgroup$
    – aglearner
    Commented Sep 13, 2016 at 14:09

1 Answer 1

5
+300
$\begingroup$

I think the following is a counter example to your first question. Let $k = n = 1$, so we consider $(x,y) \in [-1,1] \times (-1,1)$. Construct $F$ such that for $y_0 \le 0$ the minimum of $F(\,\cdot\,,y_0)$ is attained at $x = -1/2$ with value $F(-1/2,y_0) = \frac{-1}{y_0+1}$, and for $y_0 \ge 0$ construct a minimum at $x = 1/2$ with $F(1/2,y_0) = \frac{1}{y_0-1}$, and extend $F$ smoothly around this and growing along $x$.

I think this contradicts your requested result, since the set of minima for fixed $y_0$ is precisely those given above, while those are not critical points since $\frac{\partial F}{\partial y} \neq 0$ there.

One way of making sure that you have a critical point, is if you have a differentiable path of minima $x(y_0)$ for $F(\,\cdot\,,y_0)$. Then you can restrict $F$ to that path and apply a version of the mean value theorem to conclude that $\frac{\partial F}{\partial y}(x(y_0),y_0) = 0$ for some $y_0$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks Jaap! Indeed this looks like a counterexample. Do you think you can elaborate this example further so that $F$ does not have any critical point in $[-1,1]\times (-1,1)$? $\endgroup$
    – aglearner
    Commented Sep 13, 2016 at 21:10
  • $\begingroup$ My feeling is that there always exists a critical point, because you have directions along $x$ where $f$ increases and along $y$ where it decreases. This creates some kind of saddle configuration, that I think should always contain a critical point. Maybe Morse theory or some adaptation of the (finite-dimensional) mountain pass lemma may help you here, but I don't know these topics well. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 14, 2016 at 19:39

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .