MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Hi. Are there nice/simple examples of cyclic extensions $L/K$ (that is, Galois extensions with cyclic Galois group) for which $L$ cannot be written as $K(a)$ with $a^n\in K$?


share|cite|improve this question
Any cyclic cubic extension of the rationals will do. – Franz Lemmermeyer May 14 '10 at 12:18
You may be looking for Kummer's theorem: If $n$ is relatively prime to the characteristic of $K$, and $x^n-1$ splits in $K$, THEN every degree $n$ cyclic extension of $K$ is of the form $L=K(a)$ with $a^n \in K$. The answers below indicate why each hypothesis is needed. – David Speyer Apr 9 '14 at 16:48
up vote 5 down vote accepted

Dear Justin, your question is subtly ambiguous.

First interpretation: Is there a cyclic extension $L/K$ of degree $n$ that cannot be written $L=K(a)$ with $a\in L$ and $a^n\in K ?$.

Answer Yes. For example, let $p$ be a prime number and $n$ an integer.The extension $\mathbb F_p\subset \mathbb F_{p^{p^n}}$ is cyclic and not of the required form since $a^{p^n} \in \mathbb F_p$ implies $a\in \mathbb F_p .\;$ So the simplest possible example for your question is $\mathbb F_2 \subset \mathbb F_4$ ! [Franz and David give excellent examples in characteristic zero]

Second interpretation: Is there a cyclic extension $L/K$ of degreee $n$ that cannot be written $L=K(a)$ with $a\in L$ and $a^N\in K$ for some N that might be different from n ?

Partial answer Some examples in the preceding interpretation disappear! For instance if you take $\mathbb F_2 \subset \mathbb F_4$, you CAN write $\mathbb F_4= \mathbb F_2(a)$ with $a^\textbf{3}=1$ : just take for $a$ one of the two elements in $\mathbb F_4 \setminus \mathbb F_2$. Actually if $K\subset L$ are finite all examples disappar: all such extensions are cyclic and can be written $L=K(a)$ with $a^N\in K$. Indeed if $a\in L$ is a primitive element (which always exists: our extension is separable), we have $L=K(a)$ and if $q=card(L)$ we can be sure that $a^{q-1}=1 \in K$.

share|cite|improve this answer

An example is given by any cubic Galois extension of $\mathbb{Q}$, e.g. the extension $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha)$ where $\alpha = \cos \frac{2\pi}{9}$ is a root of $x^3 - 3x + 1$.

This works because if the extension were of the form $\mathbb{Q}(\beta)$ with $\beta^3 \in \mathbb{Q}$, then since it is Galois it would have to contain a nontrivial cube root of unity, which it obviously doesn't.

share|cite|improve this answer

Take $\zeta = e^{2\pi i/p}$ for a prime number $p\equiv1$ (mod 3), e.g. $p=7$. Then $Q(\zeta+\bar\zeta)$ is a totally real cyclic Galois extension of $\mathbf{Q}$ of degree a multiple of 3, hence contains a cubic extension $L$ that is Galois with cyclic Galois group. Being totally real it cannot be the splitting field of a polynomial of the form $X^3-a$. (or use David Loeffler's argument above).

Dirichlet's theorem on primes in arithmetic progressions assures us that we have infinitely many such examples over the base $\mathbf{Q}$.

share|cite|improve this answer

If $K$ has characteristic $p>0$, an Artin-Schreier extension $L/K$ is cyclic of degree $p$, and is generated by an element $a \in L$ such that $a^p \not \in K$. Such an $L$ has the form $K(a)$ for a root $a$ of a polynomial of the form $X^p - X - \alpha$ for suitable $\alpha \in K$; the polynomial then splits over $L$ since its roots are $a+i$ for $i \in \mathbf{F}_p$ (in this way you can see the action of the Galois group $\mathbf{Z}/p$ on the roots).

An example of such an extension is $\mathbf{F}_4/\mathbf{F}_2$ since $\mathbf{F}_4 = \mathbf{F}_2(a)$ for a root $a$ of $X^2 - X - 1 = X^2 + X +1$.

Edit(x2): Looking at Georges Elencwajg's answer, I see that I made what he labels the "First Interpretation" of the question. Since his "Second Interpetation" seems interesting, here is what I hope is an example.

Let $k$ be a field of char $p>0$, and let $K = k(t)$ for transcendental $t$. Let $L/K$ be the Artin-Schreier extension obtained by adjoining to $K$ a root $a$ of $X^p - X - t$.

I claim that $a^N \not \in K$ for any $N \ge 1$.

Well, note that $k[a,t]$ is an integral extension of $k[t]$. Hence if $a^N \in K$, then in fact $a^N \in \langle t \rangle \subset k[t]$, so that $a$ satisfies a polynomial $$X^N - tg(t) \quad \text{for some $g(t) \in k[t]$}.$$ But then $X^p - X - t$ divides $X^N - tg(t)$ and reducing mod $t$ gives a contradiction. (i.e. the condition $a^N \in K$ would mean that $L/K$ should be ramified at the prime $\langle t \rangle$ of $k[t]$, which isn't so).

So: this cyclic extension is generated by an element $a$ for which $a^N \not \in K$ for any $N \ge 1$. I expect (?!) that this should give an example for Elencwajg's "Second Interpretation" of the question, but I didn't think about other possible generators for the extension $L/K$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Dear George, you haven't been sloppy at all: you had already posted your answer while I was writing mine, and your interpretation of the question was quite natural (same as Franz's or David's and maybe even Justin's!). As for the example in your edit, although I agree that $a^{p^i} \not \in K$, I fail to see why this shows $a^N \not \in K$ for $N$ prime to $p$ . Could you please elaborate ? – Georges Elencwajg May 14 '10 at 16:17
Right -- I seemed to have been conning myself a bit with argument I had in mind. I've replaced it with a different argument; see Edit. But in fact the example isn't quite enough (see final sentence). – George McNinch May 14 '10 at 20:32

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.