8
$\begingroup$

The question is the following :

  • Question:

Does there exist infinitely many primes of the form $(2m+1)^2-2^{2s+1}$ with $m,s\geq 1$ ?

  • Why this could be true:

Bunyakowsky conjecture would imply that the answer is yes for any given $s$.

[ Indeed, the polynomial $4X^2+4X-2^{2s+1}+1$ is irreducible ($\Delta = 2^{2s+5}$), and no integer $d\geq 1$ can divide all values $P(n)$ (since $P(0)$ is odd and $P(1)-P(0)=8$) ]

Unfortunately, as the Wikipedia page indicates, Bunyakowsky conjecture is not known to hold for a single polynomial of degree $\geq 2$.

My hope is that allowing $s$ to assume infinitely many values can help ...

  • Why this could be hard:

As was pointed out by Mike Benett in this MO question, the density of primes of this form among primes that are congruent to $1$ mod $8$ is asymptotically $0$. (As an example, there are $20453$ primes $p<2^{20}$ that are congruent to $1$ mod. $8$, and only $1334$ among them that have the required form, so that the density up to that bound is only $0.065$).

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ The conjecture that there are infinitely many primes of form $(2m)^2+1$ is still open (and was listed as one of Landau's four problems more than 100 years ago), so maybe this is another indication your question could be hard? $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 14, 2015 at 19:19
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Do you also count negative prime values of your expression $(2m+1)^2 - 2^{2s+1}$? $\endgroup$
    – Stefan Kohl
    Commented Oct 14, 2015 at 20:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @JeppeStigNielsen : Right ... as far as I know, Euler had already asked this very question. $\endgroup$
    – few_reps
    Commented Oct 14, 2015 at 21:53
  • $\begingroup$ @StefanKohl : definitely not ! The point is that these primes furnish interesting real quadratic extensions. $\endgroup$
    – few_reps
    Commented Oct 14, 2015 at 22:02
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I think proving this would be a fantastic achievement. Compare it with the $x^2+y^4$ result of Friedlander-Iwaniec, and note that there are much more fourth powers than powers of two. $\endgroup$
    – GH from MO
    Commented Oct 14, 2015 at 22:22

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .