0
$\begingroup$

Assume $A \subseteq B=A[b]$ are integral domains, $b \in B$ is algebraic over $A$ (but not necessarily integral over $A$), and $A$ and $B$ have the same field of fractions. (Notice that $b=u/v$ for some $u, v \in A$).

I do not mind to further assume that: $A$ and $B$ are noetherian, $\mathbb{C} \subset A$, $B$ is a UFD (but I do not want to assume that $A$ is a UFD), $B$ is regular (but I do not want to assume that $A$ is regular), $B$ is separable over $A$, and if it helps I agree to assume that $b$ is integral over $A$.

My question: I wish to show that $B$ is flat over $A$. (Notice that if $B$ is flat and integral over $A$, then it is faithfully flat over $A$, and then since $A$ and $B$ have the same field of fractions, it follows that $A=B$).

I have tried to show flatness using the follwong ideas:

(1) Corollary 9 (and Theorem 5) of Wang.
But the problem is that $A$ is not a UFD, so $B$ is not isomorphic to $A[Z]/(vZ-u)$, but to $A[Z]/(h_1,\ldots, h_m)$.

(2) Lemma 1 (with Theorem 1) of Richman.

Any help will be appreciated.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I don't understand your question. If you take $A=\mathbb{C}[t^2-1,t(t^2-1)]\subset B= \mathbb{C}[t]$ (the normalization of an ordinary double point), aren't all your hypotheses fulfilled? $\endgroup$
    – abx
    Commented Jun 10, 2015 at 4:40
  • $\begingroup$ @abx: Thanks. From your point of view you are right; however, I have in mind a specific example in which it is not clear if $B$ is flat over $A$ or not. So maybe my question is misleading. $\endgroup$
    – user237522
    Commented Jun 11, 2015 at 17:09

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .