6
$\begingroup$

Given a smooth manifold $M$, there is a vector bundle over $M$, denoted $\tau M$, known as the second-order tangent bundle. The fiber $\tau_mM$ at $m\in M$ is the collection of linear operators $A_m:C^\infty(M)\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$ that satisfy

$$ A_m(f^3)=3f(m)A_m(f^2)-3f^2(m)A_m(f) $$

for each $f\in C^\infty(M)$. It isn't too hard to show that each section of $\tau M$ is locally of the form

$$A_m=a^i(m)\partial_i+b^{ij}(m)\partial^2_{ij},$$

where $a^i$ and $b^{ij}$ are smooth functions, $b^{ij}=b^{ji}$, $\partial_i=\frac{\partial}{\partial x^i}$, $\partial^2_{ij}=\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^i\partial x^j}$, and I'm using the Einstein summation convention.

For each $m\in M$ There is a short exact sequence

$$T_mM\rightarrow \tau_m M\rightarrow T_mM\odot T_mM$$

where $\odot$ denotes the symmetric tensor product. The first arrow is the inclusion map that sends a vector at $m$ to its corresponding directional derivative operator $C^\infty(M)\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$. The second arrow is given by $A_m\mapsto \hat{A}_m$, where $\hat{A}_m$ is defined by the formula

$$ \hat{A}_m(\mathbf{d}_mf,\mathbf{d}_mg)=A_m(fg)-f(m) A_m(g)-g(m) A_m(f), $$

and $f,g\in C^\infty(M)$.

My question: One way to split the sequence, and thereby identify $\tau M$ with $TM\oplus(TM\odot TM)$, is to assign to each $m\in M$ a subspace $S_m\subset \tau_mM$ that is complementary to $T_mM\subset \tau_m M$. Is there a name for such an assignment? I'd just like to know if there is an established name so that I can more easily search for what people already know about such things.

$\endgroup$
8
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ This is usually called a connection. This may be somewhat confusing, as there are other objects called connection (connections as certain first order differential operators, connections as certain lie-algebra-valued one-forms on principal bundles), but it all makes sense as all these things are equivalent to each other. $\endgroup$ Apr 12, 2015 at 20:41
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ More precisely, specifying such a splitting is equivalent to specifying a torsion-free (aka symmetric) connection. $\endgroup$ Apr 12, 2015 at 20:56
  • $\begingroup$ @MatthiasLudewig Thank you. I thought it seemed very similar in spirit to the notion of a so-called Ehresmann connection. However, I didn't see how the details worked out because, in the case of the Ehresmann connection, the exact sequence is $V_eE\rightarrow T_eE\rightarrow T_{\pi(e)}B$, where $\pi:E\rightarrow B$ is some fiber bundle and $VE\subset TE$ is the vertical subbundle. I couldn't see how $\tau_m M$ plays the role of $T_eE$. $\endgroup$
    – Josh Burby
    Apr 12, 2015 at 22:51
  • $\begingroup$ This bundle does not seem to be the same as the ones that are usually called higher order tangent bundles like here: arxiv.org/abs/1403.3111. Could you give a reference for the notion you are using? $\endgroup$ May 6, 2015 at 9:26
  • $\begingroup$ @MichaelBächtold Sure. I first saw this use of this terminology in this PHD thesis by Joan Andreu Lazaro Cami gmcnet.webs.ull.es/files/thesis/alazaro.pdf. See p. 33. The book "Global and Stochastic Analysis with Applications to Mathematical Physics" by Yuri E. Gliklikh also uses it. On page 66 of the book, there are a number of other references. $\endgroup$
    – Josh Burby
    May 6, 2015 at 20:00

1 Answer 1

6
$\begingroup$

Given a connection on the tangent bundle, you can define the second covariant derivative $\nabla^2f$ by $$ \nabla^2f[X, Y] := \partial_X\partial_Y f - \partial_{\nabla_X Y} f.$$ Then $\nabla^2f$ is a symmetric tensor provided that $\nabla$ was torsion-free, which Robert pointed out but I missed in the first moment.

(This is because $$\nabla^2f[Y, X] = \partial_X\partial_Y f + \partial_{[Y, X]} f - \partial_{\nabla_Y, X} = \partial_X\partial_Y f - \partial_{\nabla_X, Y}+ T(X, Y),$$ where $T$ is the torsion tensor of nabla.)

Now given such a torsion-free connection, you can associate to an element polynomial $p \in TM \odot TM$ the operator $$Pf = \langle p, \nabla^2 f\rangle.$$ This gives a splitting of your sequence, since the principal symbol of $P$ will be $p$ again.

Conversely, if $S: TM \odot TM \longrightarrow \tau M$ is such a splitting, set $\Gamma$ to be the projection onto $TM$ along the image of $S$ (i.e. $\Gamma = \iota^{-1}(\mathrm{id} - S \circ \pi)$ with $\pi:\tau M \longrightarrow TM \odot TM$ the projection). Then $$\nabla_X Y := \Gamma(\partial_X \partial_Y)$$ is a torsion-free connection.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I think we want a $\Gamma:\tau M\rightarrow TM$, right? Should it be $\Gamma=\iota^{-1}\circ(\text{id}-S\circ\pi)$, where $\iota:TM\rightarrow \iota(TM)\subset \tau M$ is the inclusion? $\endgroup$
    – Josh Burby
    Apr 15, 2015 at 15:08
  • $\begingroup$ $\pi$ doesn't take values in $\tau M$; I think you might want $S\circ \pi$ instead of $\pi\circ S$? $\endgroup$
    – Josh Burby
    Apr 18, 2015 at 15:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.