Given a smooth reproducing kernel $\kappa:M\times M\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ on a manifold $M$, we can construct a section, $\alpha_{\kappa}$, of the symmetric tensor product $T^*M\odot T^*M$ by taking the exterior derivative of $\kappa$ in each of its arguments and then restricting to the diagonal. More precisely, we first construct a section, $\alpha_{M\times M}$, of $T^*M\boxtimes T^*M$ using the formula \begin{align} \alpha_{M\times M}(v_1,v_2)=\frac{d}{d\epsilon_1}\bigg|_0\frac{d}{d\epsilon_2}\bigg|_0\kappa(c_1(\epsilon_1),c_2(\epsilon_2)), \end{align} where $v_j\in T_{m_j}M$ and $c_j$ is a smooth curve that passes through $m_j$ at $\epsilon_j=0$ with velocity $v_j$. $\alpha_{\kappa}$ is then given by \begin{align} \alpha_{\kappa}(v_m,w_m)=\alpha_{M\times M}(v_m,w_m), \end{align} where $v_m,w_m\in T_mM$. When a section of $T^*M\odot T^*M$ arises in this manner, I'd like to say that the section has a reproducing kernel primitive.
How can we chracterize the space of sections of $T^*M\odot T^*M$ with reproducing kernel primitives? That is, given an $\alpha\in \Gamma(T^*M\odot T^*M)$, how can we determine if there is some kernel $\kappa$ such that $\alpha=\alpha_{\kappa}$?
One straightforward consequence of the positive-semidefinite property of $\kappa$ is that $\alpha_{\kappa}|_m\in T_m^*M\odot T_m^*M$ must be a positive semi-definite bilinear form for each $m\in M$. Are there any other special properties $\alpha_{\kappa}$ must have? I want to somehow use the fact that $\mathbf{d}^2=0$, but I'm having trouble seeing where I can usefully apply it.
update 4/28: I think that when $M=\mathbb{R}$ every positive semi-definite $\alpha$ has a reproducing kernel primitive. The argument is based on the fact that each $\alpha$ must be of the form $\alpha=a\, dx\,dx$ for some non-negative smooth scalar function $a:M\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$. We can write $\sqrt{a}\,dx=d\phi$, where $\phi(x)=\int_0^x\sqrt{a}(s)\,ds$. A reproducing kernel primitive for $\alpha$ is therefore $\kappa(x,y)=\phi(x)\phi(y)$. Things are easy on $\mathbb{R}$ because, there, all $1$-forms are exact.