8
$\begingroup$

If $f(x,y)$ and $g(x,y)$ are two algebraically dependent polynomials over some field $k$, is it true that there exists a bivariate polynomial $p(x,y)$ such that both $f(x,y)$ and $g(x,y)$ are in the ring $k[p(x,y)]$?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

10
$\begingroup$

Yes. Let $k[T]$ denote the $k$-subalgebra of $k(x,y)$ generated by a subset $T$, and let $k(T)$ denote its field of quotients. Luroth's Theorem says that every field $L$, $k \subset L \subset k(x,y)$, of transcendence degree one over $k$ is equal to $k(p)$ for some $p \in k(x,y)$. A sharpening of E. Noether (char $k$ = 0) and A. Schinzel (arbritrary $k$) says that if $L$ contains a nonconstant polynomial, then some $p \in k[x,y]$ suffices (Theorem 4, page 10 in "Selected Topics on Polynomials" , by A. Schinzel). The hypothesis that $f$ and $g$ are algebraically dependent implies that $k(f,g)$ has transcendence degree $\leq 1$ over $k$. Thus $f,g \in k(p)$ for some $p \in k[x,y]$. Unique factorization in $k[x,y]$ and $k[p]$ then implies that $f,g \in k[p]$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Thanks. Is there any constructive proof telling how to find such a polynomial? $\endgroup$
    – Adam
    Commented Dec 19, 2014 at 3:24
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I have two clarificatory questions: (1) Can you explain how Luroth gives the stated claim about $L$? (I am accustomed to thinking of Luroth's thm as telling us something about $L$ between $k$ and $k(x)$, not $k(x,y)$.) (2) Can you spell out the appeal to unique factorization in the last line? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 13, 2018 at 13:15

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .