6
$\begingroup$

Let $G$ and $H$ be finite groups and $\gcd(|G|,|H|)=1$.

Suppose the lattice of all subgroups of $G\times H$ is self-dual. Is the lattice of all subgroups of $G$ self-dual?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The condition on the orders of $G$ and $H$ imply that every subgroup of $G\times H$ is of the form $A\times B$ with $A\leq G$ and $B\leq H$. Hence, the lattice of subgroups of $G\times H$ is equal to the product of the lattices of the subgroups of $G$ and of $H$. $\endgroup$ – Arturo Magidin Aug 10 '14 at 22:54
  • $\begingroup$ Yes. But it proves the inverse of the question. btw probably there is a counterexample for the question above. $\endgroup$ – Minimus Heximus Aug 11 '14 at 11:01
  • $\begingroup$ I realize the observation above doesn't answer the question; but it now looks more like: if the product of two lattices is self-dual, is one of the lattices self-dual? And that does indeed look suspect. $\endgroup$ – Arturo Magidin Aug 11 '14 at 15:04
1
$\begingroup$

The answer is Yes. This is seen as follows:

First, let us say that a group $G$ has a dual $\overline{G}$ (which is another group), if there is an order-reversing bijection $\delta\colon L(G) \to L(\overline{G})$ from $L(G)$, the subgroup lattice of $G$, onto the subgroup lattice $L(\overline{G})$ of $\overline{G}$. Groups with a dual have been studied by Suzuki and Zacher, and finite groups (even locally finite groups) with a dual are essentially classified. It follows from this classification that a (locally) finite group with a dual is even self-dual, that is, the lattice of subgroups is self-dual. (See Corollary 8.2.5 in Roland Schmidt's book Subgroup Lattices of Groups.)

Thus it suffices to see that $G$ has a dual when the subgroup lattice of $G\times H$ is self-dual. Let $\varepsilon\colon L(G\times H) \to L(G\times H)$ be the duality of the subgroup lattice. Then $\varepsilon$ induces an order-reversing bijection between the subgroups of $G$ and the subgroups of $G\times H$ containing $G^{\varepsilon}$. (I view $G$ and $H$ as subgroups of $G\times H$, so that I can apply $\varepsilon$ to $G$.) I claim that $G^{\varepsilon}$ is normal in $G\times H$. It will then follow that the factor group $(G\times H)/G^{\varepsilon}$ is a dual of $G$.

To see that $G^{\varepsilon}$ is normal, first observe that $G\times H = \langle G^{\varepsilon}, H^{\varepsilon} \rangle$, since $G\cap H = 1$ and $\varepsilon$ is a duality of the subgroup lattice. Thus we only need to show that $H^{\varepsilon}$ normalizes $G^{\varepsilon}$. Let $x\in H^{\varepsilon}$, and let $\varphi$ be the map sending a subgroup $U\leq G\times H$ to the subgroup $( ( U^{\varepsilon} )^x )^{ \varepsilon^{-1} }$. Then $\varphi$ is a lattice isomorphism of $L(G\times H)$ onto itself, and $H^{\varphi}=H$. As $G$ and $H$ have coprime orders, $G$ is the unique complement of $H$ in $G\times H$. Thus $G^{\varphi} = G$, too. It follows that $(G^{\varepsilon})^x = G^{\varepsilon}$. As $x\in H^{\varepsilon}$ was arbitrary, this means that $H^{\varepsilon}$ normalizes $G^{\varepsilon}$, and so $G^{\varepsilon}$ is normal in $G\times H$, as claimed.
(Remark: one can even show that $G\times H$ is the direct product of $G^{\varepsilon}$ and $H^{\varepsilon}$ and that these subgroups have coprime order, too. See Lemma 8.1.8 in Schmidt's book, from which I took the argument in the last paragraph.)

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Does the inverse of your "order-reversing bijection" an order-reversing bijection too? $\endgroup$ – Minimus Heximus Jun 8 '15 at 1:01
  • $\begingroup$ and what is $G^{\varepsilon}$? $\endgroup$ – Minimus Heximus Jun 8 '15 at 1:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @user47958: I use exponential notation for maps, so $G^{\varepsilon}$ is the image of $G$ under the map $\varepsilon$, denoted $\varepsilon(G)$ in a different notation. Here I implicitely identify $G$ with a subgroup of $G\times H$. "Order-reversing bijection" means that $X \leq Y \iff \varepsilon(X) \geq \varepsilon(Y)$ for subgroups $X$, $Y\leq G\times H$. With $X= \varepsilon^{-1}(U)$ and $Y=\varepsilon^{-1}(V)$, this yields that $\varepsilon^{-1}$ is order-reversing too. $\endgroup$ – Frieder Ladisch Jun 8 '15 at 12:26
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. It seems correct. Still I have to check some details. But I accept it. $\endgroup$ – Minimus Heximus Jun 8 '15 at 15:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.