I'm sure this can be found in the literature, though I don't know exactly where to look. On the other hand, it is easy to calculate the automorphism group directly from the following observations: As in Griffiths--Harris, let $M = G/\Gamma$ where $G$ is the $3$-dimensional complex Heisenberg group and $\Gamma\subset G$ is a discrete, cocompact subgroup. As Griffiths and Harris point out, there is a triple $\omega_1$, $\omega_2$, $\omega_3$ of holomorphic $1$-forms defined on $M$ such that $\omega_1\wedge\omega_2\wedge\omega_3$ is nowhere vanishing, $d\omega_1 = d\omega_2 = 0$, and $d\omega_3 = \omega_1\wedge\omega_2$.
Now, clearly, any holomorphic $1$-form on $M$ must be a constant linear combination of these three $1$-forms, so if $f:M\to M$ is an automorphism, then $f^*(\omega_i)$ must be a constant linear combination of these forms for each $i$. Moreover, because $\omega_3\wedge d\omega_3$ is a nonvanishing holomorphic $3$-form $M$, any automorphism $f$ must preserve this form up to multiplication by a unit complex number. In particular, $f^*(\omega_1\wedge\omega_2) = \lambda\ \omega_1\wedge\omega_2$ for some $\lambda\in\mathbb{C}$ with $|\lambda| = 1$. Pursuing this line, one sees that $f:M\to M$ must be covered by a biholomorphism $F:G\to G$ that preserves both the right-invariant holomorphic $1$-forms (up to constant linear combinations) and the lattice $\Gamma$ (up to an appropriate translation).
This is now a purely algebraic problem (whose solution might depend on which $\Gamma$ you use). In particular, if you let $z_1$, $z_2$, $z_3$ denote the coordinates on $G$ such that the forms $\omega_i$ pull back to $dz_1$, $dz_2$, and $dz_3 + z_1\ dz_2$, respectively, on $G$, then $F$ has to be of the form
$$
F(z_1,z_2,z_3) = (a_{11} z_1 {+} a_{12}z_2 {+} a_{10}, a_{21} z_1 {+} a_{22}z_2 {+} a_{20},
a_{33} (z_3{-}z_1z_2) {+} a_{31} z_1 {+} a_{32} z_2 {+} a_{30})
$$
for some constants $a_{ij}$ such that
$$
a_{33} = a_{11}a_{22}-a_{21}a_{12} = \lambda
$$
where $|\lambda| = 1$. It must also preserve $\Gamma$ up to an appropriate translation, which puts other restrictions on the $a_{ij}$. This will give you the automorphism group.