3
$\begingroup$

It is known that for $SU(N)$ $$ \int \chi_{\mu_1}(UV_1)\chi_{\mu_2}(U^{-1}V_2)\, dU = \delta_{\mu_1\mu_2}\frac{\chi_{\mu_1}(V_1V_2)}{\dim(\mu_1)} $$ where $dU$ is Haar measure on $SU(N)$ normalized such that with respect to it $\operatorname{Vol}(SU(N))=1$; and $\chi_{\mu}(U)$ means the trace of $U$ in the irreducible representation $\mu$.

I came across this integral in "On quantum gauge theories in two dimensions", Edward Witten, Commun. Math. Phys. 141, 153-209 (1991).

My question is simple. What else is known about integrals on $SU(N)$ of the form $$ \int \chi_{\mu_1}(U^{\pm 1}V_1)\dots\chi_{\mu_n}(U^{\pm 1}V_n)\, dU \ ? $$

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ I edited my negative answer now, and gave a rep-theoretic strategy. $\endgroup$
    – Marc Palm
    Commented Jun 27, 2013 at 9:52
  • $\begingroup$ @RicardoAndrade what was the point of adding the Haar Measure tag? the question does not really concern the details of that measure, and I find the tag rather gratuitous, representation-theory would be more apt $\endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Commented Jun 27, 2013 at 10:01
  • $\begingroup$ @Yemon: You are correct. I apologize for the tagging error. I have replaced the tag. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 27, 2013 at 10:06

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

Do the Weingarten formulas help at all? See Theorem 2.5, and the surrounding discussions, in http://arxiv.org/abs/0903.5143

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the answer. In Weingarten's formula all group elements in the integrand are in fundamental representation. But I don't think if I can get any more general results:) $\endgroup$
    – user10001
    Commented Jun 27, 2013 at 10:36
2
$\begingroup$

The first formula go under the name the Schur orthogonality relations. There is a reason for this formula to be of such a nice form. It actually holds for any compact group. Could you explain why you want to consider it?

$SU(1)$ is easy. For $SU(2)$, this involves integrals of the Chebyschev polynomials. If you can't find anything useful in the usual integral tables, there is no hope to find something for any other $n$.

Edit: As a second thought, the character $\chi_{\mu_1}\cdot \chi_{\mu_2}$ equals the character $\chi_{\mu_1 \otimes \mu_2}$, where $\mu_1 \otimes \mu_2$ is the tensor product of $SU(n)$-reps. I think that Fulton-Harris' book about representation theory explains you what you get for tensoring $SU(n)$-reps, i.e., how they decompose into irreducible things. So you have to clue together those $\chi$'s with $U$ and those with $U^{-1}$, and you can use the Schur orthogonality relations.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the answer. I am a physics student and was considering second integral in context of a kind of generalization of two dimensional Yang Mills. I couldn't find any mathematical references considering such integrals so thought about asking here. $\endgroup$
    – user10001
    Commented Jun 27, 2013 at 9:44
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ re your comment about decomposing tensors - what, you get for SU(n), once $n\geq3$, is a mess, although I think the physicists have hacked out SU(3) quite explicitly. I think Benoit Collins may have some recent work related to asymptotic behaviour for large n $\endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Commented Jun 27, 2013 at 9:54
  • $\begingroup$ @Marc thanks for your suggestion. I will try it out. $\endgroup$
    – user10001
    Commented Jun 27, 2013 at 10:43

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .