7
$\begingroup$

Is there written anywhere a full definition of BRST cohomology? All I have found so far is BRST cohomology in _______. As far as I can see, BRST cohomology is the cohomology of a complex in which the differential has at least a piece that "looks like" the Chevalley Eilenberg differential.

That seems to include all known examples, but is hardly a precise definition.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Hi Jim. Alas, there was a time when in the Physics literature every differential complex was called a BRST complex :( Which BRST cohomology are you interested in? The original of Becchi, Rouet, Stora and Tyutin? $\endgroup$ Commented May 7, 2013 at 21:23
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ What exactly is _______? :-) $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 22, 2013 at 1:41

1 Answer 1

11
$\begingroup$

It is difficult to give a precise definition, because there are many cohomology theories which go by the name of BRST. It might be helpful to give a couple of examples, not necessarily in chronological order.

In classical (i.e., non-quantum) physics, there is a notion of BRST cohomology which encodes symplectic reduction à la Marsden-Weinstein. This was the subject of my answer to an earlier question. It is the cohomology of a double complex and one of the differentials is the Chevalley-Eilenberg differential. However, it does admit generalisations (e.g., to coisotropic reduction) where there is no Chevalley-Eilenberg differential, while still being referred to as BRST cohomology.

The original BRST cohomology arose in quantum field theory, where it arose as an "invariance" of the gauge-fixed Fadde'ev-Popov action for a gauge theory and plays an important role in proving the renormalisability of four-dimensional gauge theories. The BRST differential again has a part which is the Chevalley-Eilenberg differential of the Lie algebra of the gauge group. Again, there are generalisations (to theories with "open algebras") where there is still a BRST cohomology, but now there is no longer any Chevalley-Eilenberg differential.

In the context of two-dimensional conformal field theories (e.g., string theory), the BRST cohomology can be identified with a certain (relative) semi-infinite cohomology in the sense of Feigin.

In all cases precise definitions can be given, but they are different.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .