If $G$ is a discrete torsion-free group, can its (reduced or full) group C-star algebra contain non-zero quasinilpotent elements? I've seen various examples in the group von Neumann algebra setting (usually in the context of finding quasinilpotent generators of II-1 factors) but if I remember correctly these usually don't belong to the reduced group C-star algebra.

Can we get such examples for free groups, for instance?

(My reason for assuming torsion-free is that if $G$ contains a finite non-abelian subgroup $H$, then the C-star algebra generated by H will contain a non-trivial matrix algebra and hence will contain nilpotent elements.)

  • $\begingroup$ A question on nilpotency: Is there a $C^{*}$ algebra such that each nilpotentce element has all its roots: that is for every nilpotent $a$ and $n\in \mathbb{N}$ there is $b$ with $b^{n}=a$? $\endgroup$ Nov 11, 2014 at 22:06
  • $\begingroup$ @AliTaghavi Surely this should be asked as a separate question? $\endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Nov 11, 2014 at 22:14

2 Answers 2


Kaplansky showed that every non-commutative C*-algebra contains a non-zero nilpotent element. I don't have a reference I'm afraid.

  • $\begingroup$ Ah, so I should have looked harder before asking, I guess. Thanks! $\endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Mar 29, 2013 at 23:18
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ For a proof for the above statement see, Page 110 (Proposition II.6.4.14) of Blackadar's book "Operator algebras". $\endgroup$
    – user23860
    Mar 30, 2013 at 13:12

Prompted by Douglas Somerset's answer to look harder, I've found a paper of Behncke that also gives what I need, according to MathSciNet, by proving a stronger result:

MR0283582 (44 #813) Behncke, H. Nilpotent elements in group algebras. (Russian summary) Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. Sér. Sci. Math. Astronom. Phys. 19 (1971) 197-198.

"The aim of this note is to prove the following theorem: The group algebra $L^1(G)$ of a locally compact group $G$ has nilpotent elements if and only if $G$ is non abelian."

(I haven't yet got to the library to check the proof; in particular, I don't know if it bootstraps from Kaplansky's result as mentioned in the other answer, or mimics the proof in a different setting, or uses something more closely related to the group structure.)


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.