MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top


Let $I$ be an ideal in a polynomial ring $S = k[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$, where $k$ is an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero. Fix a term order on $S$ (e.g. a lexicographic order) and let $in(I)$ denote the initial ideal of $I$, that is, the monomial ideal generated by all the initial terms of elements of $I$.

It is clear that for any $k > 0$ one has $in(I)^k \subset in(I^k)$, with equality if $I$ itself is a monomial ideal.

  • Is there an example of $I$ where for large $k$, the quotient $in(I^k) / in(I)^k$ is NOT finite dimensional (over $k$)?

  • Is there a "good" sufficient condition on $I$ and the term order to guarantee that for large $k$, $in(I^k) / in(I)^k$ is always finite dimensional? Clearly if $I$ is primary or is a monomial ideal this is the case.

share|cite|improve this question
Hello. Can you show the proof or a reference for the case when $I$ is a primary (or prime) ideal? Thank you. – Youngsu Mar 25 '13 at 1:04
Youngsu: It follows from the following observations: $I$ is primary iff $S/I$ is finite dimensional as a vector space over $k$. Since $\dim(S/I) = \dim(S/ in(I))$ it follows that $in(I)$ is also primary. Now for any $k > 0$, $in(I)^k$ should be primary. Thus $S/in(I)^k$ is finite dimensional which implies that $in(I^k) / in(I)^k$ is also finite dimensional. – Kiu Mar 25 '13 at 5:13
Here by "primary" I mean m-primary where $\mathfrak{m}$ is the maximal ideal generated by $x_1, \ldots, x_n$. Nevertheless if $\mathfrak{n}$ is another maximal ideal and $I$ is $\mathfrak{n}$-primary then $S/I$ is finite dimensional over ${\bf k}$. – Kiu Mar 25 '13 at 5:30
Kiumars: Hi. I thought by primary you meant an ideal which is primary to an arbitrary prime ideal. Now, it is clear to me too. Thank you. – Youngsu Mar 25 '13 at 19:21
Sorry Youngsu for confusion. – Kiu Mar 25 '13 at 20:26

Hal Schenck kindly provided a counter-example to the claim in question. Consider the twisted cubic: (the code is in Macaulay)

o3 I = ideal (- y^2 + x*z, - y*z + x*w, - z^2 + y*w)

i4 : J = ideal leadTerm I

o4 = ideal (z^2 , y*z, y^2 )

i5 : hilbertPolynomial coker gens ideal leadTerm I^2

o5 = - 16*P + 9*P 0 1

i6 : hilbertPolynomial coker gens ideal leadTerm J^2

o6 = - 20*P_0 + 10*P_1

So, the quotient is actually positive dimensional.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.