2
$\begingroup$

Let $I$ be a Cohen-Macaulay monomial ideal of $R=K[x_1,...,x_n]$, where $K$ is a field. Can we say the ideal $(x_1)+I$ is Cohen Macaulay?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

Not even when $I$ is square-free. Let $I$ be the ideal $(x_2x_4,x_2x_5,x_3x_4,x_3x_5, x_1x_2,x_1x_5)$. It is Cohen-Macaulay because it is the Stanley-Reisner ideal of a path of $5$ vertices (with $x_1$ in the middle). Killing $x_1$ will disconnect the graph, and indeed the ideal $(x_2x_4,x_2x_5,x_3x_4,x_3x_5)$ is not Cohen-Macaulay. You can check both statements by Macaulay 2.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ In fact, you can get rid of $x_5$ to make a smaller example. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 18, 2020 at 1:38
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you so much for your nice example $\endgroup$
    – Amir Mafi
    Commented Jan 18, 2020 at 4:59

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .