MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Given an infinity topos $\mathcal{E}$, one can pass to its hypercompletion $\widehat{\mathcal{E}}$, which is the full subcategory on those objects local with respect to $\infty$-connected morphisms (morphisms inducing isomorphisms on all homotopy sheaves). Can passing to the hypercompletion be made functorial with respect to all geometric morphisms? (For my purposes, it would suffice to know functoriality with respect to etale ones). Thanks!

share|cite|improve this question
According to in Higher Topos Theory, hypercompletion is right adjoint to the inclusion of hypercomplete $\infty$-topoi into all $\infty$-topoi. Doesn't that make it functorial? – Mike Shulman Mar 1 '13 at 2:48
@Mike: would imply right-adjointness, once we know it's functorial. That's kind of why I asked. – David Carchedi Mar 1 '13 at 10:53
In 1-category theory, a universal property of objects like that expressed by implies a unique way to extend the operation to a functor that is a right adjoint. See Theorem IV.1.2 in "Categories for the working mathematician". I presume the same must be true for $(\infty,1)$-categories. – Mike Shulman Mar 1 '13 at 11:05
@Mike: Good point, I guess I was foggy in the morning, thanks :). – David Carchedi Mar 1 '13 at 20:05

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.