1
$\begingroup$

Can the Poincaré $3$-homology sphere be smoothly embeded in $\mathbb R^4$? If it is not the case, how can we fix it?

$\endgroup$
5
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ The answer is no, as a google search found for me: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rokhlin%27s_theorem#The_Rokhlin_invariant . What do you mean by "how can we fix it"? $\endgroup$
    – j.c.
    Commented Nov 14, 2012 at 15:48
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Any homology $3$-sphere admits a locally flat topological embedding in $4$-space, by a result of Freedman. Is this the kind of fix you were after? $\endgroup$
    – Mark Grant
    Commented Nov 14, 2012 at 16:01
  • $\begingroup$ I wonder if someone would add here the reference for the Freedman result. Thanks! $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 14, 2012 at 21:15
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ why is this question closed? It seems to be related to several interesting things. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 15, 2012 at 5:21
  • $\begingroup$ I didn't vote to close but the question needs a fair bit of work following the guidelines of mathoverflow.net/howtoask $\endgroup$
    – j.c.
    Commented Nov 15, 2012 at 13:13

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

If I remember correctly, given M any homology 3-sphere then M x [0,1] can be embeded in R^4. Is this right?

$\endgroup$
4
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ In the book "4-Manifolds and Kirby Calculus" by Robert E. Gompf,András I. Stipsicz, pag.345. $\endgroup$
    – Flux
    Commented Nov 14, 2012 at 21:42
  • $\begingroup$ They admit topological embeddings but not necessarily smooth embeddings; the page you cite is specific about that point. $\endgroup$
    – j.c.
    Commented Nov 15, 2012 at 13:16
  • $\begingroup$ ...but I cannot understand why in this case the Whitney embedding result doesn't work...it hold for a general smooth manifold... is a homology 3-sphere not smooth? $\endgroup$
    – Flux
    Commented Nov 15, 2012 at 15:34
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Wouldn't Whitney embedding theorem need 6 dimensions? Am I missing something? Wikipedia says you start with an immersion with transverse self-intersections, then you fix this. (I paraphrase.) $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 17, 2012 at 14:20

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .