Timeline for Poincaré 3-homology sphere [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Dec 30, 2015 at 10:30 | history | suggested | John B | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
minor adjustments
|
| Dec 30, 2015 at 9:58 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Dec 30, 2015 at 10:30 | |||||
| Nov 15, 2012 at 13:13 | comment | added | j.c. | I didn't vote to close but the question needs a fair bit of work following the guidelines of mathoverflow.net/howtoask | |
| Nov 15, 2012 at 5:21 | comment | added | Daniel Pomerleano | why is this question closed? It seems to be related to several interesting things. | |
| Nov 14, 2012 at 21:15 | comment | added | tweetie-bird | I wonder if someone would add here the reference for the Freedman result. Thanks! | |
| Nov 14, 2012 at 21:07 | history | closed |
Dan Petersen David White Ian Agol Oscar Randal-Williams Chris Gerig |
off topic | |
| Nov 14, 2012 at 20:11 | answer | added | Flux | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 14, 2012 at 16:01 | comment | added | Mark Grant | Any homology $3$-sphere admits a locally flat topological embedding in $4$-space, by a result of Freedman. Is this the kind of fix you were after? | |
| Nov 14, 2012 at 15:48 | comment | added | j.c. | The answer is no, as a google search found for me: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rokhlin%27s_theorem#The_Rokhlin_invariant . What do you mean by "how can we fix it"? | |
| Nov 14, 2012 at 15:05 | history | asked | Flux | CC BY-SA 3.0 |