Before asking my question, a caveat: The category theorist in me would like me to ask this question in more generality, but I will restrict my scope since what I'm really after is some geometric intuition.

Let $R$ be a commutative ring. A $\mathbb Z$-filtered $R$-module is a diagram $\cdots \hookrightarrow X_{\leq -1} \hookrightarrow X_{\leq 0} \hookrightarrow X_{\leq 1} \hookrightarrow \dots$, where each $X_{\leq i}$ is an $R$-module and each map is an inclusion. I will abuse notation and denote by $X$ both the diagram and its direct limit (the union of the $X_{\leq i}$s). I am happy to assume that the inverse limit (the intersection of the $X_{\leq i}$s) is trivial. The associated graded of $X$ is the $\mathbb Z$-graded $R$-module $\operatorname{gr}(X) = \bigoplus (X_{\leq i}/X_{\leq i-1})$, where the piece $(X_{\leq i}/X_{\leq i-1})$ is put in grading $i$.

The Rees algebra of $X$ is the $R[\epsilon]$-module $$ \operatorname{Rees}(X) = \sum_i \epsilon^i X_{\leq i}[\epsilon] \subseteq X[\epsilon^{\pm 1}]. $$ I.e. you look at the $X[\epsilon^{\pm 1}] = X \otimes_R R[\epsilon,\epsilon^{-1}]$, and inside it you take the $R[\epsilon]$-module generated by all elements of the form $\epsilon^i x$ for $x\in X_{\leq i}$.

Then the Rees algebra interpolates between $X$ and $\operatorname{gr}(X)$ in the following sense: $$ \operatorname{Rees}(X)/(\epsilon=1) = \operatorname{Rees}(X) \otimes_{R[\epsilon]} R[\epsilon]/(\epsilon-1) \cong X $$ $$ \operatorname{Rees}(X)/(\epsilon=0) = \operatorname{Rees}(X) \otimes_{R[\epsilon]} R[\epsilon]/(\epsilon) \cong \operatorname{gr}(X)$$ Here the "$=$" signs are definitions and the "$\cong$" signs are canonical isomorphisms. The first of these should be completely obvious; the second is an important calculation.

The Rees algebra has the following geometric interpretation. The affine line is $\mathbb A^1 = \operatorname{spec}(R[\epsilon])$, and so any $R[\epsilon]$-module is a sheaf over $\mathbb A^1$. Consider the sheaf defined by $\operatorname{Rees}(X)$. The above isomorphisms say that $\operatorname{gr}(X)$ is the fiber of $\operatorname{Rees}(X)$ over $0 \in \mathbb A^1$, and (the union of) $X$ is the fiber over $1\in \mathbb A^1$.

Moreover, $\mathbb A^1$ has an action by the group $\mathbb G_m = \mathrm{GL}(1) = \operatorname{spec}(R[\lambda^{\pm 1}])$ given by $\epsilon \mapsto \lambda \epsilon$. This action extends to $\operatorname{Rees}(X)$, by restricting the action on $X[\epsilon^{\pm 1}]$. Thus:

$\operatorname{Rees}(X)$ is a $\mathbb G_m$-equivariant sheaf over $\mathbb A^1$.

Since $\mathbb G_m$ fixes $0 \in \mathbb A^1$, the fiber $\operatorname{gr}(X)$ of $\operatorname{Rees}(X)$ over $0$ inherits a $\mathbb G_m$-action. This is precisely the grading, wherein the $i$th graded piece is the weight space on which $\lambda \in \mathbb G_m$ acts by $\lambda^i$. I have been told that one should think of $X$-as-a-filtered-thing not as the fiber over $1$ but rather as the fiber over the generic point in $\mathbb A^1$.

Now, not every $\mathbb G_m$-equivariant sheaf over $\mathbb A^1$ arises as the Rees algebra of a filtered $R$-module. When $R$ is a field, I believe the correct statement is that:

Over a field, the $\mathbb G_m$-equivariant sheaves over $\mathbb A^1$ that arise as Rees algebras of filtered modules are precisely the $\mathbb G_m$-equivariant vector bundles.

Put another way, over a field, there always exist isomorphisms between $X$ and $\operatorname{gr}(X)$ (i.e. trivializations of the sheaf near $0$). The existence of such isomorphisms requires the axiom of choice, which says that every epimorphism splits. But this description doesn't make sense in generality. Hence:

Question: When $R$ is not a field, so that I do not necessarily have isomorphisms of $R$-modules $X \cong \operatorname{gr}(X)$, what is the geometric characterization that determines when a $\mathbb G_m$-equivariant sheaf on $\mathbb A^1$ is the Rees algebra of a filtered module?

  • $\begingroup$ What seems obvious is that, if $M$ is the graded therefore filtered $R[\epsilon]$-module, then $X$ should be $M / \langle \epsilon-1\rangle$ and therefore filtered. Trying to get an isomorphism from there, I keep running into $\epsilon$ vs $\epsilon^{-1}$ issues that always bedevil me with these algebras. $\endgroup$ – Allen Knutson Nov 4 '12 at 1:39
  • $\begingroup$ @Allen: I also occasionally get confused with $\epsilon$ versus $\epsilon^{-1}$. I think I have done everything correctly, of course, but if there is an error, please let me know! The idea is that the minimum $i$ for which $x\in X_{\leq i}$ is also the minimum $i$ for which $\epsilon^i x\in \mathrm{Rees}(X) = M$. $\endgroup$ – Theo Johnson-Freyd Nov 4 '12 at 3:25
  • $\begingroup$ What in the world does any of this have to do with Choice? $\endgroup$ – Jason Starr Feb 2 '14 at 14:22
  • $\begingroup$ @JasonStarr The "axiom of choice" is a property that some categories enjoy and other categories do not. Category $\mathcal C$ "satisfies the axiom of choice" if every epi in $\mathcal C$ splits. I generally work with a category of Sets that does satisfy this useful property; then Vect does as well. But $R$-mod for $R$ a non-semisimple ring does not; neither does Top. It was in that sense that I meant the reference to axiom of choice. $\endgroup$ – Theo Johnson-Freyd Feb 2 '14 at 18:08
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @TheoJohnson-Freyd: Okay, but what in the world does any of that have to do with your question? $\endgroup$ – Jason Starr Feb 2 '14 at 18:58

Here is a formulation: if $\mathcal{F}$ is quasi-coherent $\mathbf{G}_{m, R}$-equivariant $\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{A}^1_R}$-module such that $\epsilon$ is a nonzero divisor on $\mathcal{F}$, then one gets a filtered module as in your question.

On the one hand, it is clear that the modules you've constructed have this property.

On the other hand, let $\mathcal{F}$ be such a quasi-coherent equivariant sheaf and set $M = \Gamma(\mathcal{F})$. This module has an action of $\mathbf{G}_{m, R}$ and hence comes with a weight decomposition $M = \bigoplus M_n$ (to actually prove this you need to do a little bit of work). Observe that $\epsilon : M_n \to M_{n + 1}$ as $\epsilon$ has weight $1$. If $\epsilon$ is a nonzero divisor these maps are injective and one sees that $M$ is the Rees module associated to $M_i \to M_{i + 1} \to \ldots$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.