Let $M$ be a compact manifold, let $\tilde{M}$ be its universal cover, and suppose that the Euler characteristic $\chi(\tilde{M})=0$. My question is: does this imply that $\chi(M)=0$? This is clear if $\pi_1(M)$ is finite, but I am interested in the case $|\pi_1(M)|=\infty$.

It might not feel right, but I can't think of any counterexample, either.

Thank you very much in advance!

EDIT: I was rightfully asked what I mean by Euler characteristic of the (non compact) manifold $\tilde{M}$. My answer right now is: the one you want!

What I am thinking of, is $\chi(\tilde{M})=\sum_i (-1)^i\dim H_i(\tilde{M},k)$, with $k=\mathbb{Q}$ or $\mathbb{R}$, and $H_i$ are either the usual or the compactly supported cohomology groups.

In my case, $\tilde{M}$ retracts to a compact Lie group.

| cite | improve this question | | | | |
  • $\begingroup$ HW, I am not sure what you are asking. In your example $\chi(\tilde{M})$ is not 0... if $M_1\to M_2$ is a $n$-sheeted covering then $\chi(M_1)=n\cdot\chi(M_2)$, so $\chi(M_1)=0$ iff $\chi(M_2)=0$. Probably I didn't understand your comment though. $\endgroup$ – CuriousUser Oct 9 '12 at 12:38
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, I just realised I miscalculated the Euler characteristic! My mistake. I'm going to delete the comment, since it was silly. $\endgroup$ – HJRW Oct 9 '12 at 12:40
  • $\begingroup$ And, as you say, it is obvious for finite-sheeted covers. $\endgroup$ – HJRW Oct 9 '12 at 12:40
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ If $\pi_1(M)$ is infinite, then $\widetilde{M}$ is not compact: in what sense of Euler characteristic do you mean in this case? $\endgroup$ – Oscar Randal-Williams Oct 9 '12 at 12:53
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If $\tilde{M}$ is a Lie group and the fundamental group $\pi$ a subgroup, then there is a nonvanishing $\pi$-equivariant vector field on $\tilde{M}$ that descends to a nonvanishing vector field on $M$, whence $\chi(M)=0$. What is the case you are interested in? $\endgroup$ – Johannes Ebert Oct 14 '12 at 15:46

Here is sketch proof that $\chi(\tilde{M})=0$ implies that $\chi(M)=0$ for fundamental groups with certain finiteness properties.

The idea is to adapt the usual spectral sequence proof that the Euler characteristic is multiplicative on fibrations. Let $k$ be a field of characteristic zero, and let $\pi=\pi_1(M)$. The Cartan-Leray spectral sequence of the regular cover $\tilde M\to M$ has $E^2 = H_p(\pi;H_q(\tilde M;k))$ and converges to $H_{p+q}(M;k)$. But we can also go one page back and start at $E^1 =F_p\otimes_{k[\pi]} H_q(\tilde M;k)$, where $F_\bullet$ is a free resolution of $k$ by $k[\pi]$-modules. (Reference: K. Brown, Cohomology of groups, VII.5 and VII.7.) Now in a spectral sequence the Euler characteristic of each page is the Euler characteristic of the previous one, so it suffices to check that $\chi(E^1)=0$ when $\chi(\tilde M)=0$.

If the trivial module $k$ admits a finite free resolution by $k[\pi]$-modules, we can choose each $F_p$ to be a finitely generated free $k[\pi]$ module, so $F_p$ is a direct sum $k[\pi]^{n(p)}$ for some $n(p)$. I think we then get $F_p\otimes_{k[\pi]} H_q(\tilde M;k)\cong k^{n(p)}\otimes_k H_q(\tilde M;k)$ as vector spaces, and the result follows in the usual way since the Euler characteristic of a tensor product of finite dimensional graded vector spaces is the product of their Euler characteristics.

| cite | improve this answer | | | | |
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @Mark: Isn't your argument a variant/generalization of the following: suppose that $\tilde M$ (although not necessarily compact!) has the homotopy type of a finitely dominated space. Consider the fibration $\tilde M \to M \to B\pi$. Then if $B\pi$ is finitely dominated, the Euler characteristic of $M$ is a product of the Euler characteristic of $\tilde M$ with the Euler characteristic of $B\pi$ (because the fibration is orientable). $\endgroup$ – John Klein Oct 14 '12 at 16:01
  • $\begingroup$ @John: Yes, I think that's right. Although I don't really see why your fibration is orientable? (In particular, couldn't $\pi$ act non-trivially on the homology of $\tilde M$?) Meanwhile, it seems orientability is not really necessary for this argument; see mathoverflow.net/questions/80326/… $\endgroup$ – Mark Grant Oct 14 '12 at 16:18
  • $\begingroup$ @Mark: your're right, the fibration doesn't need to be orientable, and in fact is might not be. $\endgroup$ – John Klein Oct 14 '12 at 17:54
  • $\begingroup$ What does this condition mean in terms of ordinary group theory or topology? $\endgroup$ – Will Sawin Oct 14 '12 at 22:22
  • $\begingroup$ @Will: In group theoretical notion, the condition says that $\pi$ is of type $FP$. $\endgroup$ – Ralph Oct 14 '12 at 22:42

Take a hyperbolic, compact, connected, oriented $3$-manifold $M$. Then The universal cover $\tilde{M}$ is contractible and thus $\chi(\tilde{M})=\dim H_0(\tilde{M})=1$.

| cite | improve this answer | | | | |
  • $\begingroup$ Hi Liviu, thanks for the answer. The thing is, my question is the other way round. I am assuming that $\tilde{M}$ has zero Euler characteristic, and I ask wether the same is true for $M$. $\endgroup$ – CuriousUser Oct 9 '12 at 13:40
  • $\begingroup$ Ooops! Missed the $\tilde{}$. $\endgroup$ – Liviu Nicolaescu Oct 9 '12 at 14:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.