1
$\begingroup$

A connected sum decomposition of a closed $n$-manifold $M^n$: $M^n = M_1^n \# M_2^n$, is to view $M^n$ as two closed $M_1^n$ and $M_2^n$, joined by a neck $I\times S^{n-1}$.

Similarly, a $k$-connected sum decomposition of a closed $n$-manifold $M^n$: $M^n = M_1^n \#_k M_2^n$, is to view $M^n$ as two closed $M_1^n$ and $M_2^n$, joined by $k$ necks, each has a form $I\times S^{n-1}$.

I like to know the reference is this "$k$-connected sum decomposition". Is there a classification of $n$-manifolds via the $k$-connected sum decomposition? Is there a classification of 3-manifolds via the $k$-connected sum decomposition?

$\endgroup$
1

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

I don't have a reference, but I think it's not too hard to see that $M_1 \#_k M_2 \approx M_1 \# X_k \# M_2$, where $X_k = (S^1 \times S^{n-1})^{\# (k-1)}$. (Connected sum depends on choices of embedded disks, and so does $k$-connected sums; I'm assuming you want all $k$ pairs of disks to be isotopic.) So decomposing using $k$-connected sum is not so different from decomposing using usual connected sum, except for some bookkeeping about extra summands of $S^1 \times S^{n-1}$.

The idea of this formula $M_1 \#_k M_2 \approx M_1 \# X_k \# M_2$ is that gluing the first neck gives $M_1 \# M_2 \approx M_1 \# S^n \# M_2$; the remaining $k-1$ necks may then be attached to the middle $S^n$ instead of between $M_1$ and $M_2$, each of which creates an $(S^1 \times S^{n-1})$-summand.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.