7
$\begingroup$

For a free group $F$, an element $w$ is primitive if it is part of some free basis for $F$.

Let $\pi:F[x_0,x_1,...,x_n]\rightarrow F[x_1,x_2,...,x_n]$ be defined $\pi (x_0)=1$ and $\pi (x_i)=x_i$ for $i\geq 1$.

My question is:

Is there an example of a cyclically reduced primitive element $w$ in $F[x_0,x_1,...,x_n]$ satisfying $\pi(w)=1$ whose length is greater than 1?

[Added for clarification]

Note: if $w$ is an example, then there must be more than one occurrence of $x_0$ in $w$ and the exponent sum of $x_0$ in $w$ must be $\pm 1$.

$\endgroup$
8
  • $\begingroup$ There is a basis (xyzx^{-1}y^{-1}, xyz, y)$. $\endgroup$ Jun 15, 2022 at 16:18
  • $\begingroup$ It is true that this is a basis., therefore each element is primitive. But I don't think it provides an example. I assume you are taking $x_0 = z$. In this case, after applying $\pi$ to your set, we get $\{ xyx^{-1}y^{-1},xy,y \}$. $\endgroup$ Jun 15, 2022 at 17:38
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, thanks!... $\endgroup$ Jun 15, 2022 at 19:06
  • $\begingroup$ Do you know the answer for $n=1$? $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Jun 15, 2022 at 20:42
  • $\begingroup$ @YCor For $n=1$ I think no such $w$ can exist, since in this case the image of $\pi$ is abelian, so $w$ would be of the form $x_0^\pm$ times a commutator, and then the fact that $Out(F_2)\cong GL_2(\mathbb{Z})$ implies that $w$ is conjugate to $x_0^\pm$. But this doesn't work at all for $n>1$, since the image of $\pi$ is not abelian, and also there's a non-trivial Torelli group to worry about.... $\endgroup$ Jun 16, 2022 at 1:50

1 Answer 1

10
$\begingroup$

No, there cannot be a primitive element $w \in \ker \pi$ that is not conjugate to $x_0$ or $x_0^{-1}$.

The map $\pi$ factors through $F[x_0, x_1, \dots, x_n] / \langle \langle w \rangle \rangle$, which is isomorphic to $F_n$ since $w$ is primitive. As the free group is Hopfian, this means the induced surjection $F[x_0, x_1, \dots, x_n] / \langle \langle w \rangle \rangle \to F_n$ is in fact an isomorphism, so $w$ and $x_0$ have the same normal closure in $F_{n+1}$. A theorem of Magnus from 1931, citing from Lyndon and Schupp's book "Combinatorial Group Theory", states:

Proposition II.5.8. If two elements $r_1$ and $r_2$ in a free group $F$ have the same normal closure in $F$, then $r_1$ is conjugate to $r_2$ or to $r_2^{-1}$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.