0
$\begingroup$

While learning differential equations, I was reading some notes, and it was mentioned that for Dirichlet BVP

$$x'' = f (t, x), \quad x(0) = 0 = x(1).$$ Suppose $f : [0, 1] \times \mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$ is continuous and there is a constant $R > 0$ such that $f (t, R) \ge 0$, $f (t, −R)\leq 0$, for all $t \in [0, 1]$. It can be shown that there is at least one solution, but the proof is missing.

Can someone please help me out with this?

How to find such an constant $R$, for some problem say, $$x'' = x^3 + t,\quad x(0) = 0 = x(1)$$ to show that this has at least one solution?

Regards, Salil

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

The assumption tells you that $x_+\equiv R$ is a super-solution, and $x_-\equiv -R$ a sub-solution, of your problem. This means that $x_-''\ge f(t,x_-)$, $x_+''\le f(t,x_+)$, and $x_-\le0\le x_+$ at $t=0,1$.

It is a general fact that when a BVP for a second-order differential equation admits a sub- and a super-solution $x_\pm$, and if $x_-\le x_+$, then the problem admits a solution $x$ such that $x_-\le x\le x_+$.

Idea : Take $\lambda>0$ large enough that $x\mapsto g(t,x):=f(t,x)-\lambda x$ be non-increasing over $[-R,R]$, for every $t\in[0,1]$. Rewrite the problem as $$x''-\lambda x=g(t,x).$$With $x(0)=x(1)=0$, this is equivalent to an integral equation $$x(t)=-\int_0^1K_\lambda(t,s)g(s,x(s))ds=:(Tx)(t).$$ The kernel $K_\lambda$ is bounded and continuous. Let us define the convex subset $C$ of ${\mathcal C}(0,1)$ by the conditions $$x(0)=x(1)=0,\qquad x_-\le x \le x_+.$$ Because of the monotonicity of $g$, and because $Tx_-\ge x_-$, $Tx_+\le x_+$, $T$ maps $C$ into itself. In addition, $T(C)$ is relatively compact (a consequence of Ascoli-Arzela). By Schauder fixed point theorem, it admits a fixed point $\bar x$. This $\bar x$ is a solution of your problem.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ So, does this imply that x'' = x^3 + t, x(0) = 0 = x(1) has a solution? If yes, how? $\endgroup$
    – Salil
    Commented Sep 23, 2010 at 8:01
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You just take $R=1$. You should do the application by yourself. MO is not the place to discuss these details. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 23, 2010 at 12:58
  • $\begingroup$ ok... thanks Denis! I will do that. $\endgroup$
    – Salil
    Commented Sep 23, 2010 at 14:54

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .