2
$\begingroup$

Let $p$ be a prime, and let $\mathcal{U}$ be a family of finite $p$-groups such that

  1. Any group isomorphic to a group in $\mathcal{U}$ is also in $\mathcal{U}$
  2. Any product of groups in $\mathcal{U}$ is also in $\mathcal{U}$
  3. Any subgroup of a group in $\mathcal{U}$ is also in $\mathcal{U}$.

Is it automatically true that any quotient of a group in $\mathcal{U}$ also lies in $\mathcal{U}$? This seems unlikely but I could not think of a counterexample. (I tried various things involving dihedral groups and generalised quaternion groups, but did not go much beyond that.) Here is an initial result:

Lemma: if $A$ is abelian and is a quotient of a group $G\in\mathcal{U}$, then $A\in\mathcal{U}$.

Proof: we can write $A$ as a product of cyclic groups $C$. As $\mathcal{U}$ is closed under products, it will suffice to prove that $C\in\mathcal{U}$. Choose an element $g\in G$ that maps to a generator of $C$. Then $g$ generates a cyclic subgroup $C'\leq G$ whose order must be a multiple of $|C|$. It follows that $C'$ contains a subgroup $C''$ isomorphic to $C$. As $\mathcal{U}$ is closed under subgroups and isomorphisms, it follows that $C\in\mathcal{U}$. ☐

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Maybe specify what you mean by product: direct products? or more general ones? $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Commented Aug 30, 2020 at 17:43
  • $\begingroup$ I just mean Cartesian product of groups. I'm not sure what other kind of products could be relevant here. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 30, 2020 at 17:49
  • $\begingroup$ Semidirect products, etc. I guess it's less interesting then, but this was only a guess. You probably mean direct products. Cartesian is a set-wise definition (the underlying set of a semidirect product is the Cartesian product of sets), and "direct" precisely means that the law is not twisted. $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Commented Aug 30, 2020 at 17:52

2 Answers 2

5
$\begingroup$

No. Fix an odd prime $p$. Let $H_p$ be a non-abelian group of order $p^3$ and exponent $p$ (this is unique to isomorphism).

Let $\mathcal{C}_p$ be the class of $p$-groups not containing any subgroup isomorphic to $H_p$. Then $\mathcal{C}_p$ is stable under taking subgroups (obvious) and direct products (easy because $H_p$ has a unique minimal normal subgroup).

Then it is enough to show that $H_p$ is quotient of some group in $\mathcal{C}_p$. Let $G_p$ be the free group on 2 generators in the variety of groups satisfying that $x^{p^2}=[y,z^p]=[[x,[y,z]]=1$ for all $x,y,z$, so $H_p$ is a quotient of $G_p$. It is enough to show that $G$ has no subgroup isomorphic to $H_p$. Indeed, $G_p$ has order $p^5$, and it is easy to check ($*$) that all elements in $G_p$ of order $p$ commute; hence it does not contain any copy of $H_p$.

($*$) I see it by writing $G_p$ as a Lie algebra over $\mathbf{Z}$ using Malcev-Lazard correspondence, namely the free Lie algebra over $\mathbf{Z}$ satisfying the laws $p^2x=p[y,z]=[x,[y,z]]=0$ for all $x,y,z$. It's quotient of the Heisenberg Lie algebra over $\mathbf{Z}/p^2\mathbf{Z}$ (which is the free one in the variety of laws $p^2x=[x,[y,z]]=0$), which has order $p^6$, by the subgroup of order $p$ in its center, hence has order $p^5$ ("basis" $(u,v,w)$ with $p^2u=p^2v=pw=0$, $[u,v]=w$), and precisely the set of elements killed by $p$ is an $p$-elementary abelian subgroup of order $p^3$, with "basis" $(pu,pv,w)$.

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

This is more or less the same as YCor's answer but perhaps more elementary. Let $p$ be an odd prime, and let $\mathcal{U}$ be the class of $p$-groups in which all elements of order $p$ commute. This is clearly closed under isomorphisms, products and subgroups. Now let $G$ be the group of matrices over $\mathbb{Z}/p^2$ of the form $$ g = \left[\begin{array}{ccc} 1&u&v \\ 0&1&w \\ 0&0&1 \end{array}\right], $$ and let $\overline{G}$ be the corresponding group over $\mathbb{Z}/p$. In $G$ we find that $g^p=1$ iff $u,v,w\in p.\mathbb{Z}/p^2$, and it follows easily that $G\in\mathcal{U}$. In $\overline{G}$ we find that all elements satisfy $g^p=1$, and so $G\not\in\mathcal{U}$. There is an evident surjective homomorphism $G\to\overline{G}$, so $\mathcal{U}$ is not closed under quotients.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Indeed, in my answer I could have taken this $G$ (of order $p^2$) instead of its quotient $G_p$ (of order $p^5$). Both don't contain any copy of their quotient $\bar{G}\simeq H_p$. $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Commented Aug 30, 2020 at 19:19
  • $\begingroup$ (As no one won't have realised, of course @YCor meant $G$ has order $p^6$, not $p^2$.) $\endgroup$
    – LSpice
    Commented Aug 30, 2020 at 20:50
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @LSpice weird typo! thanks for noticing. $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Commented Aug 30, 2020 at 20:53

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .