1
$\begingroup$

The Barratt-Eccles operad $E$ in the category of simplicial sets is obtained by applying the nerve functor to the canonical operad $\{\Sigma_n\}_{n>0}$ in groups. Berger-Fresse defined here an operad morphism from the normalized chains of $E$ onto the Surjection operad, another very canonical $E_{\infty}$-operad.

I am looking to understand this morphism better. The authors simple give an algorithm but do not hint at the origin of or motivation for their description. Any clues? Thanks!

$\endgroup$
1
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Have you tried contacting the authors? I'm sure they'll be pleased to answer your questions. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 21, 2019 at 21:13

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

As written in the paper that you cite, this construction originates from two papers of McClure–Smith, and a geometric interpretation of the table reduction morphism is given in:

Clemens Berger and Benoit Fresse. "Une décomposition prismatique de l'opérade de Barratt-Eccles." (French) C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 335 (2002), no. 4, pp. 365–370.

In particular, I think Lemme 3.3 is enlightening. Let me very quickly summarize it.

Recall that $\mathcal{E}(n) = \Bbbk[E\Sigma_n]$ is the Barratt–Eccles operad, where $\mathcal{E}(n)_d = \Bbbk[\Sigma_n^{d+1}]$. It is the linearization of a simplicial operad $\mathcal{W}$. On the other hand, $\mathcal{X}$ is the surjection operad, where $\mathcal{X}(n)_d$ has for basis the set of surjections $u : \{1,\dots,n+d\} \to \{1,\dots,n\}$ such that $u(i) \neq u(i+1)$ for all $i$.

For a surjection $u \in \mathcal{X}(n)_d$, let $d_k = \# u^{-1}(k)$. There is an associated prism $\tau_u : \Delta^{d_1-1} \times \dots \times \Delta^{d_n-1} \to \mathcal{W}(n)$ defined combinatorially. Among all these prisms, there is a maximal one, called the fundamental simplex. Then:

Lemma 3.3. The map $TR : \mathcal{E} \to \mathcal{X}$ is characterized by the following properties:

  1. it is a chain map;
  2. if $\sigma$ is the maximal simplex of a prism $\tau_u$, then: $$TR(\sigma) = \begin{cases} u & \text{if } \sigma \text{ is the fundamental simplex of } \tau_u; \\ 0 & \text{otherwise.} \end{cases}$$
$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .