6
$\begingroup$

Suppose that $f: X \rightarrow Y$ is a morphism between algebraic varieties. If $Y$ is smooth, and the fibers of $f$ over closed points of $Y$ are proper and nonsingular, does it follow that $X$ is smooth?

Update: The answer to the question as posed, is NO. See a comment by Karl Schwede below for a counterexample.

Modified question: Let $f$ be a surjective morphism of algebraic varieties (reduced, irreducible, separated schemes, finite type over an algebraically closed field). Let $x \in X$ be a closed point and let $y = f(x)$. Just because the fiber $f^{-1}(y)$ is smooth does not mean $X$ is smooth at $x$. What if $X \times_Y Spec \mathcal{O}_y/m^n$ is smooth over $Spec \mathcal{O}_y/m^n$ for every positive integer n - is $X$ smooth at $x$? Here $m$ is the maximal ideal of the local ring at $y$.

Is there any condition on $f$ or the fibers which will guarantee smoothness of the total space? Flatness plus smooth fibers is one, is there anything weaker?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ In the modified question, the scheme-theoretic fibre of f over $\mathcal{O}_{y}/\mathfrak{m}^n$ will be nonreduced for n>1, and hence not a regular scheme --- am I misinterpreting the question? $\endgroup$
    – Mike Roth
    Commented Jun 1, 2010 at 19:53
  • $\begingroup$ No, it wasn't carefully thought out. Thanks - now it is more open ended. $\endgroup$
    – unknown
    Commented Jun 1, 2010 at 20:31

5 Answers 5

4
$\begingroup$

No. The blow up of a point on the plane provides a counterexample. You need to add flatness.

Added: It seems I answered something different from what was asked. Perhaps someone can answer the actual question, which isn't so clear to me.

10 seconds later: It looks like Karl Schwede has a counterexample below.

$\endgroup$
8
  • $\begingroup$ The blowup of a smooth variety along a smooth subvariety is still smooth though? $\endgroup$
    – unknown
    Commented Jun 1, 2010 at 14:41
  • $\begingroup$ I'm asking about the domain X, not the morphism f. $\endgroup$
    – unknown
    Commented Jun 1, 2010 at 15:00
  • $\begingroup$ OK, sorry. I misread your question. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 1, 2010 at 15:06
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Modifying Donu's example very slightly, blow up the ideal $(x^2, y^2)$. You have two charts, one is $k[x, y, (y/x)^2] = k[a,b,c]/(a^2*c - b)$ and the other is the other obvious (and symmetric) one. This chart isn't smooth, the fiber over the closed point $(x, y)$ is $k[c]$. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 1, 2010 at 15:11
  • $\begingroup$ Ah, I think you are right (though you mean b^2 in your formula). Thanks, is there any other condition on the situation (besides flatness) which would guarantee that the domain is smooth or is it just hopeless? $\endgroup$
    – unknown
    Commented Jun 1, 2010 at 15:33
2
$\begingroup$

An even more basic example: take $X$ to be any singular affine variety, and $f$ to be the inclusion of $X$ into the affine space $\mathbb{A}^N$.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ That is a good point, I should probably include surjetive. $\endgroup$
    – unknown
    Commented Jun 1, 2010 at 19:14
2
$\begingroup$

I apologize for answering such an old question, but it seems fundamental. A classical counterexample occurs for the abel map of a Prym variety with exceptional singularities on the theta divisor. The point is that the fibers of the abel prym map X-->Y of the double cover C'-->C are included among those for the abel map of C', hence are all smooth. (A map obtained by restricting another map over a subvariety of the target has the same fibers.)

Nonetheless X is singular at any exceptional divisor. (see lemma 2.13 of A Riemann singularities theorem for Prym theta divisors, with applications).

The point of the previous paper was that generalizing the Riemann - Kempf singularity theorem to prym varieties is easy when X is smooth. But when X is singular it is considerably harder:

A necessary and sufficient condition for Riemann's singularity theorem to hold on a Prym theta divisor

Singularities of the Prym theta divisor

For a detailed discussion of the case of the abel prym map for a prym variety isomorphic to the intermediate jacobian of the cubic threefold, see:

On parametrizing exceptional tangent cones to Prym theta divisors

The answer is yes however if the target Y is a smooth curve, since X is smooth at any point lying on a smooth cartier divisor, (compare Mumford, chap.7, Prop. 2, redbook.)

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Cool stuff! Cheers $\endgroup$
    – ssx
    Commented Jan 22, 2019 at 21:25
1
$\begingroup$

I think the answer is no. Consider the case where $X$ is the two coordinate axes in $\mathbb{A}^2$ (corresponding to the ring $\mathbb{C}[x,y]/(xy)$) and $f$ is the projection onto the first axis (corresponding to $\mathbb{C}[x] \to \mathbb{C}[x,y]/(xy)$). Then the fibers of this map are a point, except over zero where the fiber is an $\mathbb{A}^1.$

I realize that this map is not proper, but I'm sure you could modify this example so that the map is proper.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Nice example, but for me, an algebraic variety includes irreducible... $\endgroup$
    – unknown
    Commented Jun 1, 2010 at 15:37
0
$\begingroup$

Here is an example where all the spaces involved are irreducible.

Let Y = variety of nilpotent 2 by 2 matrices.

X = variety of pairs (N, F) where N is in Y and F is a line preserved by N.

Let f : X -> Y be the natural projection. Now X is certainly smooth (as the projection to P^1 is a smooth morphism) and the fibres of f are points or P^1's. But Y is not regular.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ That's backwards. He wants an example where Y is smooth but X is not. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 1, 2010 at 18:08

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .