3
$\begingroup$

How to prove that the direct sum of two stable vector bundles of the same slope over a smooth curve is a semistable bundle?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

9
$\begingroup$

One possible answer could be: by opening any book on vector bundles, and looking at the proposition right after the definition of stable vector bundle. :)

Another possible answer is as follows.

What you ask is valid in much more generality on any compact Kähler manifold.

Proposition. Let $\mathcal F$ and $\mathcal G$ two torsion free coherent sheaves over a compact Kähler manifold $(X,\omega)$. Then, $\mathcal F\oplus\mathcal G$ is $\omega$-semistable if and only if $\mathcal F$ and $\mathcal G$ are both $\omega$-semistable with $\mu(\mathcal F)=\mu(\mathcal G)$.

Here, $\mu(\mathcal E):=\deg_\omega\mathcal E/\operatorname{rank}\mathcal E$, where $$ \deg_\omega\mathcal E:=\int_X c_1(\mathcal E)\wedge\omega^{n-1},\quad\dim X=n, $$ for any torsion free coherent sheaf $\mathcal E$.

Proof. Suppose first that $\mathcal F$ and $\mathcal G$ are both $\omega$-semistable with the same slope $\mu$. Then, $\mu(\mathcal F\oplus\mathcal G)=\mu$. Given a subsheaf $\mathcal E$ of $\mathcal F\oplus\mathcal G$, set $\mathcal E_1=\mathcal E\cap(\mathcal F\oplus 0)$ and $\mathcal E_2$ to be the image of $\mathcal E$ under the projection $\mathcal F\oplus\mathcal G\to\mathcal G$. By the semistability of $\mathcal F$ and $\mathcal G$ you have $$ \deg_\omega(\mathcal E_i)\le\mu\cdot\operatorname{rank}\mathcal E_i,\quad i=1,2. $$ Therefore, $$ \mu(\mathcal E)=\frac{\deg_\omega(\mathcal E_1)+\deg_\omega(\mathcal E_2)}{\operatorname{rank}\mathcal E_1+\operatorname{rank}\mathcal E_2}\le\mu, $$ and $\mathcal F\oplus\mathcal G$ is $\omega$-semistable.

Conversely, you have $$ \mu(\mathcal F\oplus\mathcal G)=\mu(\mathcal F)=\mu(\mathcal G). $$
Indeed one has the following lemma, which follows almost immediately from the definition of semistability.

Lemma. If $$ 0\to\mathcal S\to\mathcal E\to\mathcal Q\to 0 $$ is a short exact sequence of coherent sheaves on a compact Kähler manifold $(X,\omega)$, then $$ \operatorname{rank}(\mathcal S)(\mu(\mathcal E)-\mu(\mathcal S))+\operatorname{rank}(\mathcal Q)(\mu(\mathcal E)-\mu(\mathcal Q))=0. $$

Now, this lemma permits to define semistability also in terms of quotient sheaves. Namely, $\mathcal E$ is semistable if and only if for every quotient sheaf $\mathcal E\to\mathcal Q\to 0$ of positive rank one has $\mu(\mathcal E)\le\mu(\mathcal Q)$.

But then, since both $\mathcal F$ and $\mathcal G$ are at the same time quotient sheaves and subsheaves of $\mathcal F\oplus\mathcal G$, the equality of slopes follows.

Finally, any subsheaf $\mathcal E$ of $\mathcal F$ or $\mathcal G$ is a subsheaf of their direct sum, as well. Hence, $$ \mu(\mathcal E)\le\mu(\mathcal F\oplus\mathcal G)=\mu(\mathcal F)=\mu(\mathcal G).\quad\square $$

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Why is $\mu(\mathcal{F}+\mathcal{G})=\mu(\mathcal{F})=\mu(\mathcal{G})$? $\endgroup$
    – Babai
    Commented Nov 16, 2016 at 19:51
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'll expand the answer to explain that. $\endgroup$
    – diverietti
    Commented Nov 17, 2016 at 9:08
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ A careful comment: For locally free sheaves $E$ and $F$ over $X$ we have $$deg(E ⊗ F) = rk E \deg F + rk F \deg E$$ see userpage.fu-berlin.de/hoskins/M15_Lecture14.pdf $\endgroup$
    – user21574
    Commented Apr 27, 2017 at 4:22

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .