How to prove that the direct sum of two stable vector bundles of the same slope over a smooth curve is a semistable bundle?
1 Answer
One possible answer could be: by opening any book on vector bundles, and looking at the proposition right after the definition of stable vector bundle. :)
Another possible answer is as follows.
What you ask is valid in much more generality on any compact Kähler manifold.
Proposition. Let $\mathcal F$ and $\mathcal G$ two torsion free coherent sheaves over a compact Kähler manifold $(X,\omega)$. Then, $\mathcal F\oplus\mathcal G$ is $\omega$-semistable if and only if $\mathcal F$ and $\mathcal G$ are both $\omega$-semistable with $\mu(\mathcal F)=\mu(\mathcal G)$.
Here, $\mu(\mathcal E):=\deg_\omega\mathcal E/\operatorname{rank}\mathcal E$, where $$ \deg_\omega\mathcal E:=\int_X c_1(\mathcal E)\wedge\omega^{n-1},\quad\dim X=n, $$ for any torsion free coherent sheaf $\mathcal E$.
Proof. Suppose first that $\mathcal F$ and $\mathcal G$ are both $\omega$-semistable with the same slope $\mu$. Then, $\mu(\mathcal F\oplus\mathcal G)=\mu$. Given a subsheaf $\mathcal E$ of $\mathcal F\oplus\mathcal G$, set $\mathcal E_1=\mathcal E\cap(\mathcal F\oplus 0)$ and $\mathcal E_2$ to be the image of $\mathcal E$ under the projection $\mathcal F\oplus\mathcal G\to\mathcal G$. By the semistability of $\mathcal F$ and $\mathcal G$ you have $$ \deg_\omega(\mathcal E_i)\le\mu\cdot\operatorname{rank}\mathcal E_i,\quad i=1,2. $$ Therefore, $$ \mu(\mathcal E)=\frac{\deg_\omega(\mathcal E_1)+\deg_\omega(\mathcal E_2)}{\operatorname{rank}\mathcal E_1+\operatorname{rank}\mathcal E_2}\le\mu, $$ and $\mathcal F\oplus\mathcal G$ is $\omega$-semistable.
Conversely, you have
$$
\mu(\mathcal F\oplus\mathcal G)=\mu(\mathcal F)=\mu(\mathcal G).
$$
Indeed one has the following lemma, which follows almost immediately from the definition of semistability.
Lemma. If $$ 0\to\mathcal S\to\mathcal E\to\mathcal Q\to 0 $$ is a short exact sequence of coherent sheaves on a compact Kähler manifold $(X,\omega)$, then $$ \operatorname{rank}(\mathcal S)(\mu(\mathcal E)-\mu(\mathcal S))+\operatorname{rank}(\mathcal Q)(\mu(\mathcal E)-\mu(\mathcal Q))=0. $$
Now, this lemma permits to define semistability also in terms of quotient sheaves. Namely, $\mathcal E$ is semistable if and only if for every quotient sheaf $\mathcal E\to\mathcal Q\to 0$ of positive rank one has $\mu(\mathcal E)\le\mu(\mathcal Q)$.
But then, since both $\mathcal F$ and $\mathcal G$ are at the same time quotient sheaves and subsheaves of $\mathcal F\oplus\mathcal G$, the equality of slopes follows.
Finally, any subsheaf $\mathcal E$ of $\mathcal F$ or $\mathcal G$ is a subsheaf of their direct sum, as well. Hence, $$ \mu(\mathcal E)\le\mu(\mathcal F\oplus\mathcal G)=\mu(\mathcal F)=\mu(\mathcal G).\quad\square $$
-
$\begingroup$ Why is $\mu(\mathcal{F}+\mathcal{G})=\mu(\mathcal{F})=\mu(\mathcal{G})$? $\endgroup$– BabaiCommented Nov 16, 2016 at 19:51
-
1$\begingroup$ I'll expand the answer to explain that. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 17, 2016 at 9:08
-
2$\begingroup$ A careful comment: For locally free sheaves $E$ and $F$ over $X$ we have $$deg(E ⊗ F) = rk E \deg F + rk F \deg E$$ see userpage.fu-berlin.de/hoskins/M15_Lecture14.pdf $\endgroup$– user21574Commented Apr 27, 2017 at 4:22