1
$\begingroup$

Over a smooth algebraic curve, do all vector bundles admit a finite resolution by semi-stable bundles? Or is there a characterization of the vector bundles that do?

Edit: As an example on $\mathbb{P}^1$, it is possible. For a vector bundle tensor it with the right $\mathcal{O}(n)$ so that the smallest summand in the decomposition of the vector bundles to line bundles is $\mathcal{O}$. So we have $E=\mathcal{O}^{\oplus a_0}\oplus \ldots \mathcal{O}(m)^{\oplus a_m}$ for $m>0$. Now surject to this an $\mathcal{O}^{\oplus k}$ for the right $k$ that each $\mathcal{O}$ corresponds to the generators of the global sections. Looking at the kernel, it is the direct sum of kernels of $\mathcal{O}^{\oplus k_i}\rightarrow \mathcal{O}(i)$. If $i=0$ this becomes bascially the identity $\mathcal{O}\rightarrow \mathcal{O}$. If $k_i$ is given by the exact right value that is the dimension of $\Gamma(\mathcal{O}(i))$, then the kernel of $\mathcal{O}^{\oplus k_i}\rightarrow \mathcal{O}(i)$ will have summands of the form $\mathcal{O}(j)$ where $j<0$ (Because the kernel doesn't have a global section since we chose the right $k_i$). But since $j$'s sum up to $-i$ so all of them are between $-i$ and $-1$. Now direct summing all these kernels tells us that the range of the $j$'s appearing in the kernel is between $-\mu_{max}$ and $-\mu_{min}-1$. Note that we assumed initially that $\mu_{min}=0$. This implies that the value $\mu_{max}-\mu_{min}$ for the kernel is strictly less that the original vector bundle. Continuing this way implies that we have to stop at somewhere and when we do we have written a finite resolution of the vector bundle by the semi-stable ones.

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ I think the standard proof that you have a resolution by direct sums of line bundles shows this: if $E$ is a vector bundle, we can harmlessly replace $E$ by its twist by a line bundle and thus assume $E$ is globally generated. There is then a surjection $\bigoplus \mathcal O_C\to E\to 0$. The term $\bigoplus \mathcal O_C$ is semistable, and by induction on projective dimension the kernel of this morphism is resolved by semistable bundles. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 6, 2021 at 19:25
  • $\begingroup$ I still don't get why the last element which appears to be a kernel has to be semi-stable? is it going to be in the form of $\oplus \mathcal{O}(n)$ too? $\endgroup$
    – user127776
    Commented Jan 6, 2021 at 20:52
  • $\begingroup$ The kernel will probably not be semistable (or even locally free), but you can surject onto it from a semistable/locally free sheaf (by the same reasoning as for $E$), and thus continuing inductively you're done. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 7, 2021 at 0:09
  • $\begingroup$ But the resolution needs to be finite. At some point you need to stop and the kernel needs to be semi stable. $\endgroup$
    – user127776
    Commented Jan 7, 2021 at 0:14
  • $\begingroup$ The resolution will be finite by Hilbert's syzygy theorem- if you repeat the above process, it will terminate after a finite number of steps (with last term semistable). $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 7, 2021 at 5:50

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

Devlin Mallory's approach is essentially correct, and in fact the situation is even a little better than he suggested.

Let $V$ be an arbitrary vector bundle of rank $n$. Let $W$ be a stable bundle of rank $n+1$ (if one exists) or a semistable bundle. Fix an ample bundle $\mathcal O(1)$.

I claim that for $m$ sufficiently large, there is a map $W(-m) \to V$ that is surjective and whose kernel is a line bundle (and thus is automatically stable).

It suffices to take $m$ large enough that $V\otimes W^\vee \otimes \mathcal O(m)$ is globally generated. We can view sections of this line bundle as maps $W(-m) \to V$, and the fiber of the section at a point corresponds to the fiber of the map at a point.

Maps from an $m+1$-dimensional vector space to an $m$-dimensional vector space have full rank outside of a codimension $2$ locus. Thus among global sections of $V \otimes W^\vee \otimes \mathcal O(m)^\vee$, those without full rank at a given point have codimension $2$. So those which fail to have full rank at one or more points of $C$ have codimension $1$. Thus we can find a section which has full rank at every point, which implies it is surjective and its kernel is a line bundle.

Over finite fields, this codimension argument doesn't work, but an analogous counting argument does.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Regarding your first sentence about the approach suggested in the comments above being essentially correct. Does it mean if we repeat the generic resolution, which means tensors it with $\mathcal{O}(1)$ until it becomes globally generated and then surject $\mathcal{O}^n$ for n the dimension of the global sections, eventually lead to a kernel that is semi-stable? $\endgroup$
    – user127776
    Commented Jan 11, 2021 at 1:40
  • $\begingroup$ @user127776 I meant the general idea of twisting up, choosing a bunch of sections, and then looking at the kernel. I'm not very knowledgable about Hilbert's syzygy theorem. $\endgroup$
    – Will Sawin
    Commented Jan 11, 2021 at 2:06

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .