5
$\begingroup$

On page 3 of this paper, the authors give a Bruhat cell decomposition of a quadric hypersurface $Q$ of complex dimension $n$. This may be a stupid question, but it doesn't seem clear to me what exactly the decomposition is. They only explicitly describe the real dimension $2n-2$, $n$, and $n+2$ cells, but say that there is exactly one cell for each even real dimension. Particularly, I would like to know what the complex codimension 2 cells are.

$\endgroup$
0

1 Answer 1

10
$\begingroup$

Let $Q$ live in $\mathbb{P}^{2n-1}$, so $Q$ defines a symmetric bilinear form on $\mathbb{C}^{2n}$, and the complex dimension of $Q$ is $2n-2$. Take a flag of isotropic subspaces $0 \subset F_1 \subset F_2 \subset \cdots \subset F_n$. So $\mathbb{P}(F_i) \subset Q$. For $1 \leq i \leq n-1$, the class of $\mathbb{P}(F_i)$ spans $H_{2i-2}(Q)$ or, Poincare dually, spans $H^{4n-2i-2}(Q)$.

Let $F_i^{\perp}$ denote the $Q$-orthogonal to $F_i$. So $F_n=F_n^{\perp} \subset F_{n-1}^{\perp} \subset \cdots \subset F_2^{\perp} \subset F_1^{\perp}$. For $1 \leq i \leq n-2$, the intersection $\mathbb{P}(F_i)^{\perp} \cap Q$ is a smooth hypersurface in $\mathbb{P}(F_i^{\perp})$. It is a basis for $H_{4n-2i-2}(Q)$, or for $H^{2i-2}(Q)$.

The remaining case is middle cohomology; $H_{2n-2}(Q)$. The recipe of the first paragraph would suggest taking $\mathbb{P}(F_n)$; the recipe of the second paragraph would suggest taking $\mathbb{P}(F_{n-1}^{\perp}) \cap Q$. In fact, these two classes together form a basis for the two dimensional space $H_{2n-2}(Q)$, but there is a better way to think about it. The quadratic form $Q$, restricted to $F_{n-1}^{\perp}$, has kernel $F_{n-1}$, and hence descends to a nondegenerate pairing on $F_{n-1}^{\perp}/F_{n-1}$. A symmetric nondegenerate bilinear form on a $2$-dimensional vector space has precisely two isotropic subspaces. One of them is $F_n/F_{n-1}$. Call the other one $F'_n/F_{n-1}$, so $F'_n$ is another isotropic plane sitting between $F_{n-1}$ and $F_{n-1}^{\perp}$. Then $(\mathbb{P}(F_n), \mathbb{P}(F'_n))$ form a basis for $H_{2n-2}(Q)$. From the above description, we see that $\mathbb{P}(F_{n-1}^{\perp}) \cap Q = \mathbb{P}(F_n) \cup \mathbb{P}(F'_n)$.

The Bruhat cells are just formed by taking each Schubert variety and removing the smaller Schubert varieties inside it.

In my opinion, it would be best to define a complete isotropic flag to consist of the data $F_1 \subset F_2 \subset \cdots \subset F_{n-2} \subset F_n, F'_n$. (Note that we can recover $F_{n-1}$ as $F_n \cap F'_n$.) If you notice that the containments between these subspaces look like the $D_n$ Dynkin diagram, that's not a coincidence...


$\def\Span{\mathrm{Span}}$ ADDED It might help to write all of this out for $Q$ given by $x_1 x_8 + x_2 x_7 + x_3 x_6 + x_4 x_5$. Let $F_1 = \Span(e_1)$, $F_2 = \Span(e_1, e_2)$, $F_3 = \Span(e_1, e_2, e_3)$ and $F_4 = \Span(e_1,e_2,e_3, e_4)$. So $F_i^{\perp} = \Span(e_1, e_2, \ldots, e_{8-i})$ and $F'_4 = \Span(e_1, e_2, e_3, e_5)$.

The Bruhat cells (also known as Schubert cells) are $$(1:0:0:0:0:0:0:0)$$ $$(t:1:0:0:0:0:0:0)$$ $$(t:u:1:0:0:0:0:0)$$ $$(t:u:v:1:0:0:0:0) \ \mbox{and} \ (t:u:v:0:1:0:0:0)$$ $$(t:u:-wx:w:x:1:0:0)$$ $$(t:-vy-wx:v:w:x:y:1:0)$$ $$(-uz-vy-wx:u:v:w:x:y:z:1)$$

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, this is exactly what I needed because for my purposes I don't really care about the representation theory side of this. Do you know any good references for this approach to determining Bruhat cells? $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 6, 2012 at 13:54
  • $\begingroup$ I'm terrible for references. But I suspect Jim Humphreys will show up soon with a reference :). $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 6, 2012 at 13:58
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Christopher: Of course there's also the general Lie theory version, but it sounds like you want something more explicit, along the lines of David's nice answer. For that you might try Chapter 6 of Fulton-Pragacz, Schubert varieties and degeneracy loci. (They focus on complete flags, but give very concrete parametrizations via matrices.) I'm sure there are other references... $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 6, 2012 at 16:47

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .