7
$\begingroup$

There is no closed complex curve or surface with $h^{1, 0}-h^{0, 1}=1$.

Now consider threefolds. Can this condition be satisfied?

Is Serre duality in fact the only restriction on the Hodge diamond?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The existence of the Hopf surface and the techniques of this paper (specifically Cor. 3.8 ― will be 3.9 in final version) immediately imply that there are no universal linear relations between Hodge numbers of compact complex manifolds other than those induced by Serre duality. But that doesn't say much about the much harder "inverse Hodge" problem. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 30, 2020 at 15:54
  • $\begingroup$ In addition, here is a post I wrote containing an example of the difficulty of the inverse Hodge problem: the Hodge diamond $$\begin{array}{ccccc}&&1&&\\&1&&1&\\0&&1&&0\\&1&&1&\\&&1&&\end{array}$$ can not be realised by an algebraic surface, but does not obviously violate symmetry, non-negativity, hard Lefschetz, etc. I don't immediately see whether this is also a counterexample in the non-Kähler case, but it could be a first thing to try. I expect that the situation for (simply connected) threefolds is no different. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 30, 2020 at 17:23
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @R.vanDobbendeBruyn: The Hodge numbers of a non-Kähler surface $X$ satisfy $h^{1,0}(X) = h^{0,1}(X) - 1$, so that Hodge diamond cannot be realised. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 30, 2020 at 17:55

1 Answer 1

10
$\begingroup$

Let $R$ be a commutative ring with identity. The three-dimensional Heisenberg group over $R$ is

$$\mathbb{H}(3, R) = \left\{\begin{bmatrix} 1 & z^1 & z^3\\ 0 & 1 & z^2\\ 0 & 0 & 1\end{bmatrix} : z^1, z^2, z^3 \in R\right\}.$$

The Iwasawa manifold $\mathbb{I}_3$ is the quotient of $\mathbb{H}(3, \mathbb{C})$ by the discrete subgroup $\mathbb{H}(3, \mathbb{Z}[i])$ acting on the left, i.e. $\mathbb{I}_3 := \mathbb{H}(3, \mathbb{Z}[i])\setminus\mathbb{H}(3, \mathbb{C})$. It is a compact complex threefold with $h^{1,0}(\mathbb{I}_3) = 3$ and $h^{0,1}(\mathbb{I}_3) = 2$. The holomorphic one-forms $dz^1$, $dz^2$, and $dz^3 - z^1dz^2$ on $\mathbb{H}(3, \mathbb{C})$ descend to $\mathbb{I}_3$ and form a basis for $H^{1,0}_{\bar{\partial}}(\mathbb{I}_3)$, while the $(0,1)$-forms $d\bar{z}^1$ and $d\bar{z}^2$ descend to a basis of $H^{0,1}_{\bar{\partial}}(\mathbb{I}_3)$.

As for your second question, consider the following potential Hodge diamond (which satisfies the symmetries imposed by Serre duality):

$$\begin{array}{ccccccc}&&&1&&&\\&&0&&0&&\\&0&&0&&0&\\0&&0&&0&&0\\&0&&0&&0&\\&&0&&0&&\\&&&1&&&\end{array}$$

There does not exist a compact complex threefold with this Hodge diamond. In particular, Serre duality is not the only restriction on the Hodge diamond of a compact complex threefold.

To see this, first note that on a compact complex manifold, it follows from the Frölicher spectral sequence that $b_k \leq \sum_{p+q=k}h^{p,q}$. So if $X$ were to have the Hodge diamond above, it would satisfy $b_0(X) = b_6(X) = 1$ and $b_i(X) = 0$ otherwise; that is, $X$ is a six-dimensional rational homology sphere. It follows that $c_1(X) \in H^2(X; \mathbb{Z})$ and $c_2(X) \in H^4(X; \mathbb{Z})$ are torsion, so

$$\chi(X, \mathcal{O}) = \int_X\operatorname{Td}(X) = \int_X\frac{1}{24}c_1(X)c_2(X) = 0,$$

but $\chi(X, \mathcal{O}) = h^{0,0}(X) - h^{0,1}(X) + h^{0,2}(X) - h^{0,3}(X) = 1 \neq 0$. Therefore, no such $X$ exists.

This fact can be generalised in two ways.

  1. The above argument can be used to show that if a compact complex threefold $X$ has $h^{1,1}(X) = 0$, then $1 + h^{0,2}(X) = h^{0,1}(X) + h^{0,3}(X)$ which gives a restriction on the Hodge diamond which does not follow from Serre duality.

  2. Consider the potential Hodge diamond with $h^{0,0} = h^{n,n} = 1$ and all other numbers zero (the case $n = 3$ gives the Hodge diamond above). This cannot be realised unless $n = 1$. As before, we see that if $X$ has the given Hodge diamond, then $X$ is a $2n$-dimensional rational homology sphere. In this paper, Aleksandar Milivojevic and I showed that a rational homology sphere which admits an almost complex structure must have dimension $2$ or $6$, see Theorem 2.2, so the Hodge diamond cannot be realised for $n \neq 1, 3$. For $n = 1$, the Hodge diamond is realised by $\mathbb{CP}^1$, while the argument above shows that it cannot be realised for $n = 3$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ do you know if Serre duality is the only restriction on the Hodge diamonds of threefolds? $\endgroup$
    – user164740
    Commented Sep 30, 2020 at 13:25
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I have added an example which shows that Serre duality is not the only restriction. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 4, 2021 at 16:30

You must log in to answer this question.