Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 7, 2020 at 17:04 history edited user164740 CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 61 characters in body
Sep 30, 2020 at 17:55 comment added Michael Albanese @R.vanDobbendeBruyn: The Hodge numbers of a non-Kähler surface $X$ satisfy $h^{1,0}(X) = h^{0,1}(X) - 1$, so that Hodge diamond cannot be realised.
Sep 30, 2020 at 17:23 comment added R. van Dobben de Bruyn In addition, here is a post I wrote containing an example of the difficulty of the inverse Hodge problem: the Hodge diamond $$\begin{array}{ccccc}&&1&&\\&1&&1&\\0&&1&&0\\&1&&1&\\&&1&&\end{array}$$ can not be realised by an algebraic surface, but does not obviously violate symmetry, non-negativity, hard Lefschetz, etc. I don't immediately see whether this is also a counterexample in the non-Kähler case, but it could be a first thing to try. I expect that the situation for (simply connected) threefolds is no different.
Sep 30, 2020 at 16:53 history edited user164740 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 64 characters in body
Sep 30, 2020 at 15:54 comment added R. van Dobben de Bruyn The existence of the Hopf surface and the techniques of this paper (specifically Cor. 3.8 ― will be 3.9 in final version) immediately imply that there are no universal linear relations between Hodge numbers of compact complex manifolds other than those induced by Serre duality. But that doesn't say much about the much harder "inverse Hodge" problem.
Sep 30, 2020 at 13:43 history edited user164740 CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 81 characters in body
Sep 30, 2020 at 13:13 answer added Michael Albanese timeline score: 10
Sep 30, 2020 at 11:05 history edited user164740 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 93 characters in body
Sep 30, 2020 at 10:52 history edited user164740 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1 character in body
Sep 30, 2020 at 10:42 history asked user164740 CC BY-SA 4.0