5
$\begingroup$

Let $n\ge 3$ be an integer. I would like to know if the following property $(P_n)$ holds: for all real numbers $a_i$ such that $\sum\limits_{i=1}^na_i\geq0 $ and $\sum\limits_{1\leq i<j<k\leq n}a_ia_ja_k\geq0$, we have $$n^2\sum_{i=1}^na_i^3\geq\left(\sum_{i=1}^na_i\right)^3.$$ I have a proof that $(P_n)$ holds for $3\leq n\leq8$, but for $n\geq9$ my method does not work and I did not see any counterexample for $n\ge 9$.

Is the inequality $(P_n)$ true for all $n$? Or otherwise, what is the largest value of $n$ for which it holds?

Thank you!

$\endgroup$
24
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @YCor I just think so because I solved during my live one problem or maybe two. Can I think so? You do not allow me? :) $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 18, 2020 at 14:16
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Well, it's confusing, as it conveys some wrong information. I edited your post; of course you can write that your guess is that it fails for large $n$, but "it seems" suggested that you have a serious reason to believe so. $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Commented Apr 18, 2020 at 15:07
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ With Rolle (applied $n-3$ times to $\prod (x-a_i)$) it gives something which is wrong for large $n$. But I think Rolle does not reduce an inequality to the equivalent one: the antiderivative of a polynomial with real roots only may fail to have real roots only. I suggested something less elegant and straightforward: is three variables are mutually distinct, we may vary them so that the difference LHS-RHS increases. It reduces the problem to the situation when $a_i$'s take only two different values. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 18, 2020 at 18:21
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ SageMath (actually just Python) gives $(-2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1)$ as a counterexample for $n=9$. Can you check? $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 18, 2020 at 19:11
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @jcdornano yes: $6\sum a_i^3=(\sum a_i)^3-3(\sum a_i)(\sum a_i a_j)+3\sum a_i a_j a_k$. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 18, 2020 at 22:20

3 Answers 3

10
$\begingroup$

Take $n=3k$, $2k$ variables equal to $3$ and $k$ variables equal to $-5$ for large $k$. Then $\sum a_i=k>0$, and $\sum_{i<j<k} a_ia_ja_k=\frac16 (\sum a_i)^3+O(k^2)=\frac{k^3}6+O(k^2)>0$ for large $k$. But $\sum a_i^3<0$.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you, Fedor! $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 18, 2020 at 20:01
2
$\begingroup$

This is just a long comment, but translating to the notation of symmetric functions, you ask if whenever $e_{111}(x) \geq 0$ and $e_3(x) \geq 0$, we have $$ n^2 p_{(3)}(x) \geq p_{111}(x). $$ This latter is equivalent with $$ n^2 \left( 3e_3-3e_{21}+e_{111} \right) \geq e_{111}. $$ Perhaps one can try different bases and see if something nice pops out...

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

A sort of (partial) explanation for what happens:

Let $N \ge 3$ the degree and let $A=\sum{a_k}, B=\sum_{j<k}a_ja_k, C=\sum_{j\ne k\ne m \ne j}a_ja_ka_m $. We are given that $A \ge 0, C \ge 0$ and we need to prove that $N^2(A^3-3AB+3C) \ge A^3$. Now we can assume wlog $A =1$ since if $A=0$ the inequality is obvious and otherwise we can divide by $A>0$ and consider $c_j=\frac{a_j}{A}$ and prove the inequality for them etc

So we need to prove $1-3B+3C \ge \frac{1}{N^2}$ under the hypothesis as above (the polynomial $X^N-X^{N-1}+BX^{N-2}-CX^{N-3}+...$ has real roots and $C \ge 0$

Then if we let $b_j=a_j-\frac{1}{N}, A_1,B_1,C_1$ the corresponding symmetric polynomials in $b_j$ we have $A_1=0, B_1=B-\frac{N-1}{2N}=B-\frac {1}{2}+\frac{1}{2N}, C_1=C-B+\frac{2B}{N}+\frac{1}{3}-\frac{1}{N}+\frac{2}{3N^2}$ so the inequality becomes ($C-B=C_1+...$ from the last equality)

$1+3C_1-\frac{6B}{N}-1+\frac{3}{N}-\frac{2}{N^2}\ge \frac{1}{N^2}$ and since

$\frac{6B}{N}=\frac{6B_1}{N}+\frac{3}{N}-\frac{3}{N^2}$ all reduces to

$3C_1-\frac{6B_1}{N} \ge 0$

But now the polynomial $X^N+B_1X^{N-2}-C_1X^{N-3}+...$ has real roots too as they are just $b_k$ and hence $B_1 \le 0, B_1=-B_2, B_2 \ge 0$ so the inequality reduces to $2B_2+NC_1 \ge 0$ and we know that $C_1=C+\frac{N-2}{N}B_2-\frac{(N-1)(N-2)}{6N^2}$

So we need $C_1$ negative but $C \ge 0$

By differentiating $N-3$ times and using Gauss Lucas/Rolle (so the cubic that results which is in standard form) has real roots so $4(-p)^3 \ge 27q^2$, we get some constraints on $B_2, -C_1$ which are enough to give the result for $N \le 6$ with some crude approximations

Then if we try easy counterexamples for the $b_k$ of the type $N-1$ $a$ and one $-(N-1)a$ we can solve at $N=10$, $a > \frac{3}{80}$ close enough to it to satisfy the inequality $C>0$ (which is satisifed at $a=\frac{3}{80}$ that one giving equality in the OP inequality as normalizing to integers we get $11$ taken $9$ times, $-19$ taken once and it is easy to see that the constraints are good and $S_1=80, S_3=5120$ and obviously $100\cdot 5120=80^3$

So as noted in the comments taking $9$ of $111$ and one of $-199$ gets a counterexample with a positive sum of cubes (corresponding to $a=\frac{3}{80}+\frac{1}{800}$ normalized to integers)

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .