12
$\begingroup$

I am seeking results that describe the distribution of the set of Euclidean distances between pairs of $n$ points in a unit square in the plane. For example: All the distances could be short (a tight cluster), but not all the distances could be long (all long distances force some short distances). Are there results of this general form, constraining the possible shapes of the histogram of distances, for large $n$?


           
          Distribution of point-to-point distances in a unit square.
My actual application requires some constraints on the lengths of geodesics between points sprinkled on a surface embedded in $\mathbb{R}^3$, a surface homeomorphic to a sphere. I'm hoping the planar case will shed light on geodesic constraints.

$\endgroup$
7
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Let $R$ be a subset of Euclidean space, let $\mu$ be a measure on $R$, let $\mu\times\mu$ be the product measure on $R\times R$, and let $d:R\times R\to \mathbb R$ be the distance function. Then you are interested in constraints on the function which sends $t$ to the $\mu\times\mu$ volume of $d^{-1}(t)$, right? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 26, 2019 at 13:56
  • $\begingroup$ @KevinWalker: That does appear to be a rather different phrasing of what I'm after. Thanks for that reformulation. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 26, 2019 at 14:04
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ A somewhat related result, concerning clusterization, is at arxiv.org/abs/1904.11427 $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 26, 2019 at 14:58
  • $\begingroup$ @IosifPinelis: That is helpful---Thanks! So your result says that, in some sense, the distances cannot all be long. But unfortunately not for large $n$. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 26, 2019 at 15:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This is related to your question. You can test if the points show a random distribution or not using Ripleys K function wiki.landscapetoolbox.org/doku.php/… pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/2.8/tool-reference/spatial-statistics/… $\endgroup$
    – Matthew
    Commented Feb 28, 2022 at 20:58

2 Answers 2

7
$\begingroup$

Here are three conjectures, in the hopes of showing that we can say something non-trivial.

[UPDATE: This is essentially all in a paper from Erdős, "On Sets of Distances of $n$ Points", from 1946. The conjecture on maxima is in his theorem 3, though he called that part well-known. The conjecture on minima is a later theorem of Harborth, cited here, but the bound in less precise forms is also in Erdős's theorem 3. The conjecture on modes is made after Erdős's theorem 2, in the speculation that $g(n)<n^{1+\epsilon}$, after a proof that $g(n)<n^{3/2}$. Finally Erdős's theorem 1 gives bounds on the number of distinct distances, between $(n-3/4)^{1/2}-1/2$ and $cn/(\log n)^{1/2}$.]

Maxima: Among $n$ points, the maximal distance can be achieved by at most $2n$ ordered pairs. This bound will be achieved when all the points are on a Reuleaux triangle, with the three 60-degree circle arcs centered on three of the points. [Thanks to Yoav Kallus for the idea for this construction.]

enter image description here

Minima: Among $n$ points, the minimal distance can be achieved by at most $6n-2\sqrt{12n-3}$ ordered pairs. This bound will be achieved when $n=3k^2-3k+1$ and the points are in a hexagonal lattice with $k$ points on each side of the hexagon.

enter image description here

Modes: For arbitrarily large $k$ and $n$, there are configurations of $n$ points in which the modal distance is achieved by at least $kn$ ordered pairs. For example, using square lattices:

  • If $k=7$, the distance of $\sqrt{5}=\sqrt{2^2+1^2}$ can be achieved by at least $7n$, and almost $8n$ ordered pairs.
  • If $k=15$, the distance of $\sqrt{65}=\sqrt{8^2+1^2}=\sqrt{7^2+4^2}$ can be achieved by at least $15n$, and almost $16n$ ordered pairs.
  • If $k=23$, the distance of $\sqrt{325}=\sqrt{18^2+1^2}=\sqrt{17^2+6^2}=\sqrt{15^2+10^2}$ can be achieved by at least $23n$, and almost $24n$ ordered pairs.

But the claim would be false if we replaced $kn$ by $kn^{1+\epsilon}$.

enter image description here

Again, these are only conjectures; I'd be happy to see proofs or alternatively configurations where the minimal or maximal or modal distance is achieved more often.

$\endgroup$
5
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Your "minima" conjecture is apparently a theorem of Harborth, according to arxiv.org/abs/1210.5756 $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 27, 2019 at 14:46
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ For your "maxima" conjecture, am I missing something or can you get 2n-2 ordered pairs by putting one point in the center of a circle and n-1 along a small circular arc? If you make the arc 60 degrees, you get up to 2n. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 27, 2019 at 14:50
  • $\begingroup$ @YoavKallus, you are correct! $\endgroup$
    – user44143
    Commented Nov 27, 2019 at 14:55
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The maximal number of diameters was found in P. Erdos, On sets of distances of $n$ points. Am. Math. Mon. 53 , 248–250 (1946). It is indeed $n$, and there are many other examples (e.g., the vertices of a regular $n$-gon with $n$ odd also work). $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 28, 2019 at 6:38
  • $\begingroup$ This is great, Matt! My only concern is that maybe some of your conjectures are in the literature in a form not easily recognized, as with the Harborth result. But this is what I was seeking, so: Thanks! $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 28, 2019 at 13:45
3
$\begingroup$

Let A be the measure on R^2 invariant wrt rotations about the origin with total weight at each radius equal to the frequency of that distance in your histogram. This measure is obtained by rotationally averaging the autocorrelation measure. The Fourier transform of the autocorrelation measure is nonnegative. Since the Fourier transform is equivariant under rotation, I believe this means that the Fourier transform of A must also be nonnegative. This yields some strong constraints on the histogram of distances, which are basically the entire theory behind LP bounds.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ This a neat (and new-to-me) way of viewing matters. Thanks! $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 2, 2019 at 13:56

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .