3
$\begingroup$

Numerical evidence suggests that $p_2(n) \geq n p(n)$ for large $n$.

Here $p(n)$ is the number of partitions of $n$, and $p_2(n)$ is the number of bipartitions of $n$, i.e., ordered pairs of partitions $(\alpha,\beta)$ with $|\alpha|+|\beta|=n$. I would be grateful for a proof or a disproof.

Edit: Here is a formula for $p_2(n)$:

$$p_2(n)= \sum_{a+b=n}p(a)p(b),$$ with $0 \leq a,b \leq n$ integers. This gives $p_2(0)=1, p_2(1)=2,p_2(2)=5$.

$\endgroup$
7
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In case it helps, the generating function for the number of bipartitions apparently satisfies a very nice ADE, similar to the one for partitions mathoverflow.net/a/47706/3032: $${{x^2}{{{f(x)}}^2}{{f^{{(iv)}}}(x)}}+{{({8{x^2}{f(x)}{{f'}(x)}}+{5x{{{f(x)}}^2}})}{{f'''}(x)}}-{21{x^2}{f(x)}{{{{f''}(x)}}^2}}+{{({12{x^{2}}{{{{f'}(x)}}^2}}-{15x{f(x)}{{f'}(x)}}+{4{{{f(x)}}^2}})}{{f''}(x)}}+{10x{{{{f'}(x)}}^3}}-{10{f(x)}{{{{f'}(x)}}^2}}=0$$ $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 24, 2017 at 17:39
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I should add that it is clear that it does satisfy an ADE, what may be surprising is that it would be so nice. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 24, 2017 at 17:42
  • $\begingroup$ After the OP's edit, the generating function is simply: $\prod_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac1{(1-x^k)^2}$. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 25, 2017 at 2:51
  • $\begingroup$ If you want more values etc., see oeis.org/A000712 $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 25, 2017 at 4:23
  • $\begingroup$ Just to clarify: I used the definition "square of the generating function for partitions" for the generating function for bipartitions. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 25, 2017 at 5:03

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

Asymptotically $$ p(n) \sim \frac{1}{4 n \sqrt{3}} \exp\left(\pi \sqrt{\frac{2n}{3}}\right), $$ which gives (Well, technically this is valid only for even $n$, but odd $n$ wouldn't be much different.) $$ \frac{p(n/2)^2}{p(n)} \sim \frac{1}{n\sqrt{3} } \exp\left( (2-\sqrt{2}) \pi \sqrt{\frac{n}{3}} \right). $$

Because $p_2(n)>p(n/2)^2$, we know that $p_2(n)/p(n)$ grows faster than any polynomial, as Amritanshu Prasad suggested in a comment.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Using the full sum $p_2(n) = \sigma_{a+b=n}p(a)p(b)$ might give us an approximation for $p_2(n)/p(n)$, but I don't know if there's a reasonable or elegant way to do that. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 27, 2017 at 11:01
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I think the total is $\Theta(\sqrt{n})$ times the middle term. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 27, 2017 at 11:23

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .