4
$\begingroup$

It is known that if $Q$ is an indefinite non-degenerate quadratic form on $ \mathbb{R}^n$ with $n \ge 3$, then any maximal compact subgroup $K$ of the orthogonal group $SO(Q)$ acts transitively on the projectiviziation of the light cone. In other words, if $Q(x)=Q(y)=0$ for non-zero vectors $x,y \in \mathbb{R}^n$, then there exists $g \in K$, with $gx= \lambda y$ for some $ \lambda \neq 0$. My question concerned the $p$-adic situation: suppose $Q$ is non-degenerate quadratic form on $ \mathbb{Q}_p^n$ which is isotropic, i.e. the equation $Q(x)=0$ has a non-zero solution $x \in \mathbb{Q}_p^n$ and $n \ge 3$. It is well-know that there may be more than one conjugacy classes of the maximal compact subgroups. My question is: is there at least one such maximal compact subgroup that acts transitively on the projectiviziation of the light cone?

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ No feedback ... I delete my answer. $\endgroup$
    – few_reps
    Commented Apr 27, 2015 at 16:19
  • $\begingroup$ Dear few_reps: I have read your answer and am trying to see if I can make your proof and the one given below by Paul work for SO(Q). Please repost your answer. I will give feedback soon. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 27, 2015 at 17:57
  • $\begingroup$ All right. Note that the result for $O(Q)$ will directly imply the result for $SO(Q)$ when the stabilizer of an isotropic line in the considered maximal compact group is not contained in $SO(Q)$. This is the case as soon as the space is not a hyperbolic plane. $\endgroup$
    – few_reps
    Commented Apr 27, 2015 at 20:21
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the reposting and the clarification regarding SO(Q). $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 28, 2015 at 13:21
  • $\begingroup$ So ? Any news ? $\endgroup$
    – few_reps
    Commented May 15, 2015 at 13:13

2 Answers 2

0
$\begingroup$

Let $(V,(x,y)\mapsto x.y)$ be a bilinear space. Let $L$ be a lattice on $V$, and let $G$ be its stabilizer in $O(V)$.

To an isotropic line $\ell$ in $V$ one can associate the ideal $I(\ell):=(\ell\cap L).L$, and of course, two lines $\ell_0$ and $\ell_1$ belong to a same orbit under $G$ only if $I(\ell_0)=I(\ell_1)$.

Now, when $p$ is odd, the maximal compact groups are the stabilizers of the lattices $L$ that have a decomposition : $$L\simeq H^k\perp <p>\otimes H^{r-k}\perp A$$ where

  • $r$ is the Witt index of $V$,
  • $k$ is an integer in $[0..r]$,
  • $H$ is the hyperbolic plane over $\mathbf Z_p$ ($(x,y)\mapsto x_1y_2+x_2y_1$),
  • $<p>\otimes H$ is the hyperbolic plane scaled by $p$ ($(x,y)\mapsto px_1y_2+px_2y_1$) and
  • $A$ is a maximal integral anisotropic lattice.

Thus we see that there are only two favourable cases : $k=0$ and $k=r$. In both cases, a little more work will show that the action of $G$ is indeed transitive on the isotropic lines of $V$.

When $p=2$ one has to be a little more carefull in the description of the maximal compact groups, but the result is the same.

Reference : P. Garrett, Buildings and Classical Groups.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ What is the meaning of $(\ell\cap L).L$ ? Which multiplicative structure do you use ? $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 22, 2015 at 7:24
  • $\begingroup$ I edited the answer to define some of the notations. $\endgroup$
    – few_reps
    Commented Apr 22, 2015 at 10:01
1
$\begingroup$

For ${\rm O}(Q)$, you can solve your poblem using Bruhat-Tits theory. I claim that if $K$ is a special maximal compact subgroup of ${\rm O}(Q)$, then $K$ acts transitively on the isotropic lines. Here is a proof.

The maximal parabolic subgroups of the reductive ${\mathbb Q}_p$-algebraic group ${\rm O}(Q)$ are the stabilizers of lines in ${\mathbb Q}_p^n$ generated by isotropic vectors (isotropic lines). Now note that ${\rm O}(Q)$ acts transitively on the isotropic lines. Indeed if $L_1$, $L_2$ are such lines they are isometric as quadratic spaces and by Witt's theorem, there exists $g\in {\rm O}(Q)$ such that $gL_1 =L_2$. We must prove that we can take $g$ in $K$. Let $P$ be the maximal parabolic subgroup fixing $L_1$ and let $B\subset P$ be a Borel subgroup. Since $K$ is special, we have the Iwasawa decomposition ${\rm O}(Q) = KB$, whence ${\rm O}(Q)=KP$. Then write $g=kp$, $k\in K$, $p\in P$ to obtain $L_2 =kL_1$. Q.E.D.

For ${\rm SO}(Q)$, one needs the transitivity of the action on the isotropic lines. I cannot find the argument.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .