4
$\begingroup$

Let $\pi, \pi'$ be a unitary, irreducible, supercuspidal representations of $GL_2(F)$. Does an equality of roots numbers $\epsilon(\pi, \psi, s) = \epsilon(\pi', \psi, s)$ for all $s \in \mathbb{C}$ imply an isomorphism $\pi \cong \pi'$?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

8
$\begingroup$

No -- there are far too many supercuspidals $\pi$ for it to be possible to distinguish them by a single $\varepsilon$-factor -- but this is true if you also consider root numbers of twists; this is called the "local converse theorem" and is in the Jacquet-Langlands book (SLN 114). See also Andrew Snowden's thesis. There is a generalization to $GL(n)$ if you allow twists by $GL(n-2)$ -- this is a result of Henniart.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Now, I feel stupid. Of course, converse theorems is the key word. Thank you! $\endgroup$
    – Marc Palm
    Commented Aug 28, 2013 at 17:30

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .