7
$\begingroup$

ZF proves that whenever a countable union of countable sets can be well ordered then its cardinality is at most $\aleph_1$. But what if it cannot be well ordered? The Feferman-Levy model shows the continuum can be a countable union of countable sets. Is there a ZF proof that a countable union of countable sets must be smaller than or equal to that in size?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I think that should be $\aleph_0$ in the first sentence. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 15, 2012 at 7:21
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Michael, no. It should be $\aleph_1$. If $\aleph_1$ is singular then it is the countable union of countable ordinals; but $\aleph_2$ (even if singular) can never be the countable union of countable ordinals. $\endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila
    Commented Oct 15, 2012 at 7:47

1 Answer 1

8
$\begingroup$

In Jech The Axiom of Choice, problem 14 on chapter 5 states:

Let $M$ be a transitive model of ZFC, there exists $M\subseteq N$ with the same cardinals as $M$ [read: initial ordinals] and the following statement is true in $N$:

For every $\alpha$ there exists a set $X$ such that $X$ is a countable union of countable sets, and $\mathcal P(X)$ can be partitioned into $\aleph_\alpha$ nonempty sets.

Note that $\mathcal P(X)$ can only be mapped onto set many ordinals, so this ensures us that there is indeed a proper class of cardinalities which can be written as countable unions of countable sets.

Jech adds and points out that this $N$ is not an inner model of any transitive model of ZFC, as that would imply $2^{\aleph_0}$ can be partitioned into any number of sets. The reference given is to Morris from 1970:

D. B. Morris, A model of ZF which cannot be extended to a model of ZFC without adding ordinals, Notices Am. Math. Soc. 17, 577.


I haven't sat down to verify all the details, but it should probably work:

Using an Easton symmetry-like class forcing, we may obtain model add for every regular $\kappa$ a countable collection of countable subsets of $2^\kappa$ whose union is not countable, let us denote this union $A_\kappa$. Genericity arguments should give us that for $\kappa\neq\kappa'$, $|A_\kappa|$ is incomparable with $|A_{\kappa'}|$ - namely there are no injections between those two sets.

This shows that there is a proper class of different sets which can be represented as countable unions of countable sets. So no upper-bound is possible.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ I am working on something similar in nature, so I will have the answer whether or not this argument is correct some time in the future. I will post an update when I'm done. $\endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila
    Commented Oct 15, 2012 at 8:01
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ mathoverflow.net/questions/33028/… $\:$ $\endgroup$
    – user5810
    Commented Oct 15, 2012 at 8:59
  • $\begingroup$ Ricky, and? Smaller cardinality need not be countable. $\endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila
    Commented Oct 15, 2012 at 9:10
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Oh yeah, I misread the question. $\:$ $\endgroup$
    – user5810
    Commented Oct 15, 2012 at 9:22
  • $\begingroup$ Just for anyone interested in this, I just posted on arXiv a proof of Morris' theorem: arxiv.org/abs/1811.10977 $\endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila
    Commented Nov 28, 2018 at 1:19

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .