I was writing a research paper in Computer Science. I had to provide an upper bound for the number of steps of the algorithm I had found with my colleagues; the nature of the algorithm is totally irrelevant.
I considered the worst case scenario of my algorithm, and I started calculating the number of steps. I ended up with a big mess of binomial coefficients, but carefully, step after step, everything simplified down to just the following product: $$ \prod _{j = 0}^N {}\binom{N}{j}.$$ Initially, I assumed there was no better form for this product. In fact, there are several identities about binomial coefficients, but they all involve sums and not products. Nonetheless, I tried out of curiosity to read the Wikipedia page about Binomial coefficients. To my greatest surprise, there was a section exactly about the formula I sought. Namely, Wikipedia claims the following identity is true: $$ \prod _{j = 0}^N {}\binom{N}{j} = \prod_{k = 1}^N k^{2k - N -1}.$$
I couldn't believe my own eyes. This is precisely the formula I needed, and I had no idea it existed!
However, the Wikipedia page just claims its correctness, but doesn't add any citation. If I have to use this formula in the proof of the paper, I really need to know where it comes from. I might as well just try to prove it on my own, but I am afraid that will not be a solution: the editors have given us a very strict page limit, and there is no way we'll be able to stay within that limit if we add this proof as well. Similarly, I can't use an unproven formula in a paper. I really need to find a reference for this fact in a textbook or in a peer-reviewed article, and cite it in the paper.
I tried looking on the internet, but I couldn't find anything. Has anyone seen this before? Is this a well-known fact I just missed?
Thanks in advance.