20
$\begingroup$

Suppose I have the symmetric tridiagonal matrix:

$$ \begin{pmatrix} a & b_{1} & 0 & ... & 0 \\\ b_{1} & a & b_{2} & \ddots & \vdots \\\ 0 & b_{2} & a & \ddots & 0 \\\ \vdots & \ddots & \ddots & \ddots & b_{n-1} \\\ 0 & ... & 0 & b_{n-1} & a \end{pmatrix} $$

All of the entries can be taken to be positive real numbers and all of the $a_{i}$ are equal. I know that when the $b_{i}$'s are equal (the matrix is uniform), there are closed-form expressions for the eigenvalues and eigenvectors in terms of cosine and sine functions. Additionally, I know of the recurrence relation:

$$\det(A_{n}) = a\cdot \det(A_{n-1}) - b_{n-1}^{2}\cdot \det(A_{n-2})$$

Additionally, since my matrix is real-symmetric, I know that its eigenvalues are real.

Is there anything else I can determine about the eigenvalues? Furthermore, is there a closed-form expression for them?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 8
    $\begingroup$ you might as well take $a=0$, since this is just an additive constant for each eigenvalue $\endgroup$ Commented May 22, 2013 at 23:30
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ There are older questions on MO dealing with eigenvalues of symmetric tridiagonal; no closed form. You might want to ask on the scicomp stackexchange. $\endgroup$
    – Suvrit
    Commented May 23, 2013 at 0:02
  • $\begingroup$ Might be of interest: sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037704270600015X $\endgroup$
    – anderstood
    Commented Feb 7, 2017 at 0:26

6 Answers 6

33
$\begingroup$

The type of matrix you have written down is called Jacobi matrix and people are still discovering new things about them basically their properties fill entire bookcases at a mathematics library. One of the reasons is the connection to orthogonal polynomials. Basically, if $\{p_n(x)\}_{n\geq 0}$ is a family of orthogonal polynomials, then they obey a recursion relation of the form $$ b_n p_{n+1}(x) + (a_n- x) p_n(x) + b_{n-1} p_{n-1}(x) = 0. $$ You should be able to recognize the form of your matrix from this.

As far as general properties of the eigenvalues, let me mention two:

  1. The eigenvalues are simple. In fact one has $\lambda_j - \lambda_{j-1} \geq e^{-c n}$, where $c$ is some constant that depends on the $b_j$.

  2. The eigenvalues of $A$ and $A_{n-1}$ interlace.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Do you have any references for the first property? Thanks for your help! $\endgroup$ Commented May 23, 2013 at 13:58
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ No. The proofs are simple enough that I don't know where they can be found. math.caltech.edu/Szego.html might contain these things. The main reason I'm hesitating posting a proof is that most proofs are heavy on notation, e.g. introduce orthogonal polynomials. $\endgroup$
    – Helge
    Commented May 23, 2013 at 17:11
  • $\begingroup$ Is there a typo in $b_n$? Shouldn't it be $b_{n+1} p_{n+1} + ...$? $\endgroup$
    – arash
    Commented Nov 6, 2023 at 12:21
  • $\begingroup$ Is there something more than can be said if $a_n = -(b_n+b_{n-1})$? $\endgroup$
    – lightxbulb
    Commented Nov 11 at 23:36
21
$\begingroup$

Amongst the polynomials that can arise as characteristic polynomials of tridiagonal matrices with zero diagonal, one finds the Hermite polynomials. Schur showed that Hermite polynomials of even degree are irreducible and that their Galois groups are not solvable. Hence there can be no closed form expression for the zeros in terms of the $b_i$'s in general.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ I wasn't aware of this. Thanks a lot! $\endgroup$ Commented May 23, 2013 at 1:28
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ Another argument is: it's easy to reduce any symmetric matrix to tridiagonal with similarity transforms. So if this problem were easy to solve, all symmetric eigenproblems would be. $\endgroup$ Commented May 23, 2013 at 6:40
  • $\begingroup$ Well, I didn't mean to imply that this would be easy to solve. It is too hopeful to expect a closed-form expression for the eigenvalues in terms of the bi's. However, knowing anything about what they look like would be tremendously useful to me $\endgroup$ Commented May 23, 2013 at 14:57
  • $\begingroup$ Closed form expression built from arithmetic operations and radicals. When all the $b_i$ are equal we also do not get a closed form expressions of this type or do we? $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 17, 2014 at 1:22
8
$\begingroup$

According to doi:10.1016/S0024-3795(99)00114-7, the closed form for the eigenvalues of a tridiagonal Toepliz matrix of the form

$$ \begin{bmatrix}a & b\\ c & a & b\\ & \ddots & a & \ddots \\ & & & \ddots & \\ & & & c & a \end{bmatrix} $$

is:

$$\lambda_{k}=a+2\sqrt{bc}\cos\left[\frac{k\pi}{(n+1)}\right], \quad k=1\cdots n $$

$\endgroup$
2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The one in the question is not a Toeplitz matrix. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 1, 2014 at 10:23
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You are correct, I didn't notice... $\endgroup$
    – Sparkler
    Commented Dec 1, 2014 at 15:19
2
$\begingroup$

The eigenvalues of a tridiagonal matrix are bounded by the maximum and minimum roots of a sequence of functions that form a chain sequence.

Specifically, given a general tridiagonal matrix

$$ A_n= \begin{pmatrix} a_{1} & b_{1} \\\ c_{1} & a_{2} & b_{2} \\\ & c_{2} & a_{3} & \ddots \\\ & & \ddots & \ddots & b_{n-1} \\\ & & & c_{n-1} & a_{n} \end{pmatrix} $$

The eigenvalues of $A_n$ belong to the real interval $(A,B)$ if and only if:

  1. $ \forall 1 \leq k < n $: $ A < a_k < B $
  2. $ \left\{\frac{b_k c_k}{(A-a_k)(A-a_{k+1})}\right\}^{n-1}_1 $ and $ \left\{\frac{b_k c_k}{(B-a_k)(B-a_{k+1})}\right\}^{n-1}_1 $ are both chain sequences

For more information, see theorem 1 in the paper "Bound on the Extreme Zeros of Orthogonal Polynomials" (see references below). Further, they reformulate an equivalent condition in theorem 2, which is of more practical use.

For chain sequences, Wikipedia is a good place to start, but I also recommend the paper "Chain Sequences, Orthogonal Polynomials, and Jacobi Matrices" for convergence properties of parameter sequences, which can help determine whether a given sequence satisfies the properties to be a chain sequence.

References:

[1] Ismail, Mourad E. H.; Li, Xin, Bound on the extreme zeros of orthogonal polynomials, Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 115, No. 1, 131-140 (1992). ZBL0744.33005.

[2] Szwarc, Ryszard, Chain sequences, orthogonal polynomials, and Jacobi matrices, J. Approximation Theory 92, No. 1, 59-73 (1998). ZBL0892.42014.

$\endgroup$
4
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ May I recommend giving more info on papers you link than a non-human parseable url, in case they later break? Title at minimum is good. $\endgroup$
    – David Roberts
    Commented Jun 30 at 22:45
  • $\begingroup$ I will add to David Roberts' comment that you can use citation helper to add details about the papers. (It is incorporated directly in the editor.) I have added some info at least as tooltips - but I still think that it might be stightly better to have that directly in the post. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 1 at 9:34
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thanks for the pointers; I have updated the post! $\endgroup$
    – Dunk L
    Commented Jul 9 at 6:42
  • $\begingroup$ Awesome, thanks! $\endgroup$
    – David Roberts
    Commented Jul 9 at 7:46
0
$\begingroup$

Withnout loss of generality, one can put $a=0$. For sure, there is no closed-form (or explicit) formula for the eigenvalues in general. However, at least the characteristic polynomial of $A_n$ can be written explicitly in temrs of $b_k$'s: $$\det(\lambda-A_n)=\lambda^{n}+\sum_{m=1}^{\lfloor\frac{n}{2}\rfloor}(-1)^{m}\left(\sum_{k\in\mathcal{I}(m,n)}b_{k_{1}}^{2}b_{k_{2}}^{2}\dots b_{k_{m-1}}^{2}b_{k_{m}}^{2}\right)\lambda^{n-2m}$$ where $$\mathcal{I}(m,n)=\{k\in\mathbb{N}^{m}\mid k_j+2\leq k_{j+1} \mbox{ for } 1\leq j \leq m-1,\; 1\leq k_1, \; k_m<n \}.$$

$\endgroup$
-3
$\begingroup$

Mathematica gives to you the closed form that you want. All you have to do is use de recurrence package of the program

$\endgroup$
2
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Chris Godsil's answer seems to suggest otherwise $\endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Commented Jun 16, 2014 at 22:05
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Have you yourself even tried what you suggested? $\endgroup$
    – Hans
    Commented Mar 15, 2018 at 18:19

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .