Skip to main content
added 19 characters in body; added 10 characters in body
Source Link

$$R = v_h(k-\gamma\int_{\frac{v_lk}{v_h\gamma}}^{\frac{k}{\gamma}}F(x)dx),$$ where $\gamma \in [0,1]$ is defined explicitly by Let $$\frac{v_h-v_l}{c}\int_{0}^{\frac{v_lk}{v_h\gamma}}xf(x)dx=E[x].$$

$X$ isbe a non-negative random variable that is drawn from a cumulative distribution function $F(\cdot)$, pdf $f(\cdot)$ and mean $E[x]$. $k$, $c$, $v_l$ and $v_h$ $(v_h>v_l)$ are non-negative parameters, where $c < v_h-v_l$. For convenience, define $$a=\frac{v_lk}{v_h\gamma}$$ and $b=k/\gamma$.

I am interested in showing that the function $R$ is monotonically increasing in $v_l$ (or finding sufficient conditions on the distribution function that will lead to monotonicity).

$$R = v_h(k-\gamma\int_{a}^{b}F(x)dx),$$ where $\gamma \in [0,1]$ is defined implicitly by $$\frac{v_h-v_l}{c}\int_{0}^{a}xf(x)dx=E[x].$$

Intermediate results: (1) $\gamma$ is unimodal in $v_l$. Proving monotonicity is straightforward when $\gamma$ is increasing in $v_l$, but is it so when $\gamma$ decreases in $v_l$? (2) $R$ monotonically increases in $v_l$ when $X$ is drawn from a uniform or Pareto distribution with $\alpha > 1$. I also numerically verified that it is the case when $X$ is drawn from a Gamma distribution.

$$R = v_h(k-\gamma\int_{\frac{v_lk}{v_h\gamma}}^{\frac{k}{\gamma}}F(x)dx),$$ where $\gamma \in [0,1]$ is defined explicitly by $$\frac{v_h-v_l}{c}\int_{0}^{\frac{v_lk}{v_h\gamma}}xf(x)dx=E[x].$$

$X$ is a non-negative random variable that is drawn from a cumulative distribution function $F(\cdot)$, pdf $f(\cdot)$ and mean $E[x]$. $k$, $c$, $v_l$ and $v_h$ $(v_h>v_l)$ are non-negative parameters, where $c < v_h-v_l$.

I am interested in showing that $R$ is monotonically increasing in $v_l$ (or finding sufficient conditions on the distribution function that will lead to monotonicity).

Intermediate results: (1) $\gamma$ is unimodal in $v_l$. Proving monotonicity is straightforward when $\gamma$ is increasing in $v_l$, but is it so when $\gamma$ decreases in $v_l$? (2) $R$ monotonically increases in $v_l$ when $X$ is drawn from a uniform or Pareto distribution with $\alpha > 1$. I also numerically verified that it is the case when $X$ is drawn from a Gamma distribution.

Let $X$ be a non-negative random variable that is drawn from a cumulative distribution function $F(\cdot)$, pdf $f(\cdot)$ and mean $E[x]$. $k$, $c$, $v_l$ and $v_h$ $(v_h>v_l)$ are non-negative parameters, where $c < v_h-v_l$. For convenience, define $$a=\frac{v_lk}{v_h\gamma}$$ and $b=k/\gamma$.

I am interested in showing that the function $R$ is monotonically increasing in $v_l$ (or finding sufficient conditions on the distribution function that will lead to monotonicity).

$$R = v_h(k-\gamma\int_{a}^{b}F(x)dx),$$ where $\gamma \in [0,1]$ is defined implicitly by $$\frac{v_h-v_l}{c}\int_{0}^{a}xf(x)dx=E[x].$$

Intermediate results: (1) $\gamma$ is unimodal in $v_l$. Proving monotonicity is straightforward when $\gamma$ is increasing in $v_l$, but is it so when $\gamma$ decreases in $v_l$? (2) $R$ monotonically increases in $v_l$ when $X$ is drawn from a uniform or Pareto distribution with $\alpha > 1$. I also numerically verified that it is the case when $X$ is drawn from a Gamma distribution.

added display mode
Source Link
Gerry Myerson
  • 39.9k
  • 10
  • 186
  • 247

$R = v_h(k-\gamma\int_{\frac{v_lk}{v_h\gamma}}^{\frac{k}{\gamma}}F(x)dx)$,$$R = v_h(k-\gamma\int_{\frac{v_lk}{v_h\gamma}}^{\frac{k}{\gamma}}F(x)dx),$$ where $\gamma \in [0,1]$ is defined explicitly by $\frac{v_h-v_l}{c}\int_{0}^{\frac{v_lk}{v_h\gamma}}xf(x)dx=E[x]$.$$\frac{v_h-v_l}{c}\int_{0}^{\frac{v_lk}{v_h\gamma}}xf(x)dx=E[x].$$

$X$ is a non-negative random variable that is drawn from a cumulative distribution function $F(\cdot)$, pdf $f(\cdot)$ and mean $E[x]$. $k$, $c$, $v_l$ and $v_h$ $(v_h>v_l)$ are non-negative parameters, where $c < v_h-v_l$.

I am interested in showing that $R$ is monotonically increasing in $v_l$ (or finding sufficient conditions on the distribution function that will lead to monotonicity).

Intermediate results: (1) $\gamma$ is unimodal in $v_l$. Proving monotonicity is straightforward when $\gamma$ is increasing in $v_l$, but is it so when $\gamma$ decreases in $v_l$? (2) $R$ monotonically increases in $v_l$ when $X$ is drawn from a uniform or Pareto distribution with $\alpha > 1$. I also numerically verified that it is the case when $X$ is drawn from a Gamma distribution.

$R = v_h(k-\gamma\int_{\frac{v_lk}{v_h\gamma}}^{\frac{k}{\gamma}}F(x)dx)$, where $\gamma \in [0,1]$ is defined explicitly by $\frac{v_h-v_l}{c}\int_{0}^{\frac{v_lk}{v_h\gamma}}xf(x)dx=E[x]$.

$X$ is a non-negative random variable that is drawn from a cumulative distribution function $F(\cdot)$, pdf $f(\cdot)$ and mean $E[x]$. $k$, $c$, $v_l$ and $v_h$ $(v_h>v_l)$ are non-negative parameters, where $c < v_h-v_l$.

I am interested in showing that $R$ is monotonically increasing in $v_l$ (or finding sufficient conditions on the distribution function that will lead to monotonicity).

Intermediate results: (1) $\gamma$ is unimodal in $v_l$. Proving monotonicity is straightforward when $\gamma$ is increasing in $v_l$, but is it so when $\gamma$ decreases in $v_l$? (2) $R$ monotonically increases in $v_l$ when $X$ is drawn from a uniform or Pareto distribution with $\alpha > 1$. I also numerically verified that it is the case when $X$ is drawn from a Gamma distribution.

$$R = v_h(k-\gamma\int_{\frac{v_lk}{v_h\gamma}}^{\frac{k}{\gamma}}F(x)dx),$$ where $\gamma \in [0,1]$ is defined explicitly by $$\frac{v_h-v_l}{c}\int_{0}^{\frac{v_lk}{v_h\gamma}}xf(x)dx=E[x].$$

$X$ is a non-negative random variable that is drawn from a cumulative distribution function $F(\cdot)$, pdf $f(\cdot)$ and mean $E[x]$. $k$, $c$, $v_l$ and $v_h$ $(v_h>v_l)$ are non-negative parameters, where $c < v_h-v_l$.

I am interested in showing that $R$ is monotonically increasing in $v_l$ (or finding sufficient conditions on the distribution function that will lead to monotonicity).

Intermediate results: (1) $\gamma$ is unimodal in $v_l$. Proving monotonicity is straightforward when $\gamma$ is increasing in $v_l$, but is it so when $\gamma$ decreases in $v_l$? (2) $R$ monotonically increases in $v_l$ when $X$ is drawn from a uniform or Pareto distribution with $\alpha > 1$. I also numerically verified that it is the case when $X$ is drawn from a Gamma distribution.

Source Link

Can you prove the monotonicity of the function (or find a counter example)?

$R = v_h(k-\gamma\int_{\frac{v_lk}{v_h\gamma}}^{\frac{k}{\gamma}}F(x)dx)$, where $\gamma \in [0,1]$ is defined explicitly by $\frac{v_h-v_l}{c}\int_{0}^{\frac{v_lk}{v_h\gamma}}xf(x)dx=E[x]$.

$X$ is a non-negative random variable that is drawn from a cumulative distribution function $F(\cdot)$, pdf $f(\cdot)$ and mean $E[x]$. $k$, $c$, $v_l$ and $v_h$ $(v_h>v_l)$ are non-negative parameters, where $c < v_h-v_l$.

I am interested in showing that $R$ is monotonically increasing in $v_l$ (or finding sufficient conditions on the distribution function that will lead to monotonicity).

Intermediate results: (1) $\gamma$ is unimodal in $v_l$. Proving monotonicity is straightforward when $\gamma$ is increasing in $v_l$, but is it so when $\gamma$ decreases in $v_l$? (2) $R$ monotonically increases in $v_l$ when $X$ is drawn from a uniform or Pareto distribution with $\alpha > 1$. I also numerically verified that it is the case when $X$ is drawn from a Gamma distribution.