Skip to main content
Some remarks (that do not help me, but clarify the situation somehow) are added.; Post Made Community Wiki
Source Link
Mikhail Bondarko
  • 16.9k
  • 4
  • 34
  • 97

Let $X$ be a manifold, $i: Z\to X$ is a closed embedding.

For a sheaf $S$ (of abelian groups) on a manifold $X$ and each $\varepsilon>0$ we denote by $Z_\varepsilon$ the set of points of $X$ that lie at distance $<\varepsilon$ from $X$. Consider the sheaf $S_\varepsilon:U\mapsto S(U\cap Z_\varepsilon)$, and also the section-wise limit $S_Z=\injlim_{\varepsilon\to 0} S_\varepsilon$.

I would like to understand the functor $W: S\to S_Z$ (I do not want to describe it section-wisely). Unfortunately, $S_Z$ is only an in-sheaf; it does not have to be a sheaf (in the 'usual' sense; note that the topological space $X$ is not noetherian). In particular, the stalk of $S_Z$ at any point $x\notin Z$ is easily seen to be $0$ (since $S_Z(U)=0$ for any $U$ such that its closure is disjoint from $Z$). On the other hand, the section $S_Z(X\setminus Z)$ does not seem to be $0$ (for example, if $S$ is constant); note that $X\setminus Z$ is not compact! See here the answer of algori to a previous version of this question (yesterday I believed that one can call $S_Z$ a sheaf).

Any hints (or references) for dealing with my $W$ would be very welcome! Note that $W$ is the limit of $i_{\varepsilon\ast}i_{\varepsilon}^\ast$. Unfortunately, the adjunctions that I wrote about previously probably do not hold (in any sense).

P.S. Some observations that do not seem to help me.

  1. My definition of $S_Z$ extends (without any changes) to presheaves.

  2. $W':P\mapsto P_Z$ sends ind-sheaves to ind-sheaves.

  3. It seems that ind-sheaves are (exactly) sheaves for the Grothendieck topology that admits only 'finite' covers.

So, perhaps one should use (somehow) the interplay between sheaves, ind-sheaves, and presheaves (and the corresponding topologies).

Let $X$ be a manifold, $i: Z\to X$ is a closed embedding.

For a sheaf $S$ (of abelian groups) on a manifold $X$ and each $\varepsilon>0$ we denote by $Z_\varepsilon$ the set of points of $X$ that lie at distance $<\varepsilon$ from $X$. Consider the sheaf $S_\varepsilon:U\mapsto S(U\cap Z_\varepsilon)$, and also the section-wise limit $S_Z=\injlim_{\varepsilon\to 0} S_\varepsilon$.

I would like to understand the functor $W: S\to S_Z$ (I do not want to describe it section-wisely). Unfortunately, $S_Z$ is only an in-sheaf; it does not have to be a sheaf (in the 'usual' sense; note that the topological space $X$ is not noetherian). In particular, the stalk of $S_Z$ at any point $x\notin Z$ is easily seen to be $0$ (since $S_Z(U)=0$ for any $U$ such that its closure is disjoint from $Z$). On the other hand, the section $S_Z(X\setminus Z)$ does not seem to be $0$ (for example, if $S$ is constant); note that $X\setminus Z$ is not compact! See here the answer of algori to a previous version of this question (yesterday I believed that one can call $S_Z$ a sheaf).

Any hints (or references) for dealing with my $W$ would be very welcome! Note that $W$ is the limit of $i_{\varepsilon\ast}i_{\varepsilon}^\ast$. Unfortunately, the adjunctions that I wrote about previously probably do not hold (in any sense).

Let $X$ be a manifold, $i: Z\to X$ is a closed embedding.

For a sheaf $S$ (of abelian groups) on a manifold $X$ and each $\varepsilon>0$ we denote by $Z_\varepsilon$ the set of points of $X$ that lie at distance $<\varepsilon$ from $X$. Consider the sheaf $S_\varepsilon:U\mapsto S(U\cap Z_\varepsilon)$, and also the section-wise limit $S_Z=\injlim_{\varepsilon\to 0} S_\varepsilon$.

I would like to understand the functor $W: S\to S_Z$ (I do not want to describe it section-wisely). Unfortunately, $S_Z$ is only an in-sheaf; it does not have to be a sheaf (in the 'usual' sense; note that the topological space $X$ is not noetherian). In particular, the stalk of $S_Z$ at any point $x\notin Z$ is easily seen to be $0$ (since $S_Z(U)=0$ for any $U$ such that its closure is disjoint from $Z$). On the other hand, the section $S_Z(X\setminus Z)$ does not seem to be $0$ (for example, if $S$ is constant); note that $X\setminus Z$ is not compact! See here the answer of algori to a previous version of this question (yesterday I believed that one can call $S_Z$ a sheaf).

Any hints (or references) for dealing with my $W$ would be very welcome! Note that $W$ is the limit of $i_{\varepsilon\ast}i_{\varepsilon}^\ast$. Unfortunately, the adjunctions that I wrote about previously probably do not hold (in any sense).

P.S. Some observations that do not seem to help me.

  1. My definition of $S_Z$ extends (without any changes) to presheaves.

  2. $W':P\mapsto P_Z$ sends ind-sheaves to ind-sheaves.

  3. It seems that ind-sheaves are (exactly) sheaves for the Grothendieck topology that admits only 'finite' covers.

So, perhaps one should use (somehow) the interplay between sheaves, ind-sheaves, and presheaves (and the corresponding topologies).

Mistake corrected: the adjunctions I wrote about in the previous versions of the question seem to be wrong; yet I would like to understand W better.
Source Link
Mikhail Bondarko
  • 16.9k
  • 4
  • 34
  • 97

Restriction of a sheaf to an infinitely small neighbourhood of a closed submanifold: how to work with this ind-sheaves that almost yield an left adjoint to $i_*i^*$?sheaf?!!

Let $X$ be a manifold, $i: Z\to X$ is a closed embedding.

For a sheaf $S$ (of abelian groups) on a manifold $X$ and each $\varepsilon>0$ we denote by $Z_\varepsilon$ the set of points of $X$ that lie at distance $<\varepsilon$ from $X$. Consider the sheaf $S_\varepsilon:U\mapsto S(U\cap Z_\varepsilon)$, and also the section-wise limit $S_Z=\injlim_{\varepsilon\to 0} S_\varepsilon$.

I would like to understand the functor $W: S\to S_Z$ (I do not want to describe it section-wisely). Unfortunately, $S_Z$ is only an sectionin-wise injective limit of sheaves; sosheaf; it does not have to be a sheaf (in the 'usual' sense; note that the topological space $X$ is not noetherian). In particular, the stalk of $S_Z$ at any point $x\notin Z$ is easily seen to be $0$ (since $S_Z(U)=0$ for any $U$ such that its closure is disjoint from $Z$). On the other hand, the section $S_Z(X\setminus Z)$ does not seem to be $0$ (for example, if $S$ is constant); note that $X\setminus Z$ is not compact! See here the answer of algori to thea previous version of this question (yesterday I believed that one can call $S_Z$ a sheaf).

Any hints (or references) for dealing with my $W$ would be very welcome! Note that $W$ is the limit of $i_{\varepsilon\ast}i_{\varepsilon}^\ast$. MoreoverUnfortunately, it seemsthe adjunctions that for a sheaf $F/X$ we 'almost have': $Hom(S_Z,F)\cong Hom(i^\ast S,i^\ast F)\cong Hom(S,i_\ast i^\ast F)$, i.e. $W$ is 'almost an adjoint toI wrote about previously probably do not hold $i_\ast i^\ast$'. Are there(in any ideas how to work with such 'weird adjoints'? Possibly, the situation becomes somewhat better when one passes to etale sheaves over algebraic varietiessense).

Restriction of a sheaf to an infinitely small neighbourhood of a closed submanifold: ind-sheaves that almost yield an left adjoint to $i_*i^*$??!!

Let $X$ be a manifold, $i: Z\to X$ is a closed embedding.

For a sheaf $S$ (of abelian groups) on a manifold $X$ and each $\varepsilon>0$ we denote by $Z_\varepsilon$ the set of points of $X$ that lie at distance $<\varepsilon$ from $X$. Consider the sheaf $S_\varepsilon:U\mapsto S(U\cap Z_\varepsilon)$, and also the section-wise limit $S_Z=\injlim_{\varepsilon\to 0} S_\varepsilon$.

I would like to understand the functor $W: S\to S_Z$. Unfortunately, $S_Z$ is only an section-wise injective limit of sheaves; so it does not have to be a sheaf (in the 'usual' sense; note that the topological space $X$ is not noetherian). In particular, the stalk of $S_Z$ at any point $x\notin Z$ is easily seen to be $0$ (since $S_Z(U)=0$ for any $U$ such that its closure is disjoint from $Z$). On the other hand, the section $S_Z(X\setminus Z)$ does not seem to be $0$ (for example, if $S$ is constant); note that $X\setminus Z$ is not compact! See here the answer of algori to the previous version of this question (yesterday I believed that one can call $S_Z$ a sheaf).

Any hints (or references) for dealing with my $W$ would be very welcome! Note that $W$ is the limit of $i_{\varepsilon\ast}i_{\varepsilon}^\ast$. Moreover, it seems that for a sheaf $F/X$ we 'almost have': $Hom(S_Z,F)\cong Hom(i^\ast S,i^\ast F)\cong Hom(S,i_\ast i^\ast F)$, i.e. $W$ is 'almost an adjoint to $i_\ast i^\ast$'. Are there any ideas how to work with such 'weird adjoints'? Possibly, the situation becomes somewhat better when one passes to etale sheaves over algebraic varieties.

Restriction of a sheaf to an infinitely small neighbourhood of a closed submanifold: how to work with this ind-sheaf?

Let $X$ be a manifold, $i: Z\to X$ is a closed embedding.

For a sheaf $S$ (of abelian groups) on a manifold $X$ and each $\varepsilon>0$ we denote by $Z_\varepsilon$ the set of points of $X$ that lie at distance $<\varepsilon$ from $X$. Consider the sheaf $S_\varepsilon:U\mapsto S(U\cap Z_\varepsilon)$, and also the section-wise limit $S_Z=\injlim_{\varepsilon\to 0} S_\varepsilon$.

I would like to understand the functor $W: S\to S_Z$ (I do not want to describe it section-wisely). Unfortunately, $S_Z$ is only an in-sheaf; it does not have to be a sheaf (in the 'usual' sense; note that the topological space $X$ is not noetherian). In particular, the stalk of $S_Z$ at any point $x\notin Z$ is easily seen to be $0$ (since $S_Z(U)=0$ for any $U$ such that its closure is disjoint from $Z$). On the other hand, the section $S_Z(X\setminus Z)$ does not seem to be $0$ (for example, if $S$ is constant); note that $X\setminus Z$ is not compact! See here the answer of algori to a previous version of this question (yesterday I believed that one can call $S_Z$ a sheaf).

Any hints (or references) for dealing with my $W$ would be very welcome! Note that $W$ is the limit of $i_{\varepsilon\ast}i_{\varepsilon}^\ast$. Unfortunately, the adjunctions that I wrote about previously probably do not hold (in any sense).

It turned out that my $S_Z$ is only an injective limit of sheaves; it is not a sheaf since the topology is not noetherian. Yet I wonder whether such presheaves were studied previously.
Source Link
Mikhail Bondarko
  • 16.9k
  • 4
  • 34
  • 97

A left adjoint to $i_*i^*$: restriction Restriction of a sheaf to an infinitely small neighbourhood of a closed submanifold: ind-sheaves that almost yield an left adjoint to $i_*i^*$??!!

Let $X$ be a manifold (or a variety; then I am interested in etale sheaves), $i: Z\to X$ is a closed embedding. I need a left adjoint to the functor $i_\ast i^\ast$ (for sheaves of abelian groups on $X$).

It seems that such an adjoint was not considered 'classically'. Yet now I will explain why it exists (at least, in the 'topological' setting).

For a sheaf $S$ (of abelian groups) on a manifold $X$ and each $\varepsilon>0$ we denote by $Z_\varepsilon$ the set of points of $X$ that lie at distance $<\varepsilon$ from $X$. Consider the sheaf $S_\varepsilon:U\mapsto S(U\cap Z_\varepsilon)$, and also the section-wise limit sheaf $S_Z=\injlim_{\varepsilon\to 0} S_\varepsilon$. Then for any sheaf $F/X$ we have $Hom(S_Z,F)\cong Hom(i^\ast S,i^\ast F)$, i.e.

I would like to understand the functor $W:S\mapsto S_Z$ is the adjoint desired$W: S\to S_Z$.

My question Unfortunately, $S_Z$ is: does there exist a 'sheaf only an section-theoretic' descriptionwise injective limit of $W$sheaves; so it does not have to be a sheaf (without describing each sectionin the 'usual' sense; note that the topological space $X$ is not noetherian). In particular, the stalk of $S_Z$ separately, and without mentioningat any point $Z_\varepsilon$!)? Let $i_\varepsilon$ denote the$x\notin Z$ is easily seen to be $0$ (open) embeddingsince $Z_\varepsilon\to X$. Then$S_Z(U)=0$ for any $W$$U$ such that its closure is the limit ofdisjoint from $i_{\varepsilon\ast}i_{\varepsilon}^\ast$$Z$). CertainlyOn the other hand, the problem would be solved ifsection $i^\ast$ possessed a left adjoint; yet it probably$S_Z(X\setminus Z)$ does not. In particular, seem to be $W$ cannot factorize through$0$ $i_*$ since otherwise(for example, if $S_Z$ would be zero on$S$ is constant); note that $X\setminus Z$ is not compact! See here the answer of algori to the previous version of this question (and this is wrong already for a constantyesterday I believed that one can call $S$$S_Z$ a sheaf).

Any hints (or references) for dealing with my $W$ would be very welcome! I wouldn't like to introduce any 'infinitesmall' topology hereNote that (yet comments in this direction could also be quite interesting)$W$ is the limit of $i_{\varepsilon\ast}i_{\varepsilon}^\ast$.

Some cautions Moreover, it seems that for a sheaf $F/X$ we 'almost have': $Hom(S_Z,F)\cong Hom(i^\ast S,i^\ast F)\cong Hom(S,i_\ast i^\ast F)$, i.e. $W$ is 'almost an adjoint to $i_\ast i^\ast$'. Are there any ideas how to work with such 'weird adjoints'? Possibly, the situation becomes somewhat better when one passes to etale sheaves over algebraic varieties.

  1. $i_{\varepsilon}$ is an open embedding, and not a closed one.

  2. $Z_{\varepsilon}\cap U$ is usually larger than $(Z\cap U)_{\varepsilon}$.

  3. When I speak about sheaves, I only allow coverings by manifolds (and not by infinite disjoint unions of those). $S_Z$ is (always) a sheaf only in this restricted sense (so, it is somewhat pathological). Note that $S_Z(U)=0$ for any $U$ such that its closure is disjoint from $Z$. This does not seem to imply that $S_Z(X\setminus Z)=0$; note that $X\setminus Z$ is not compact!

A left adjoint to $i_*i^*$: restriction of a sheaf to an infinitely small neighbourhood of a closed submanifold?

Let $X$ be a manifold (or a variety; then I am interested in etale sheaves), $i: Z\to X$ is a closed embedding. I need a left adjoint to the functor $i_\ast i^\ast$ (for sheaves of abelian groups on $X$).

It seems that such an adjoint was not considered 'classically'. Yet now I will explain why it exists (at least, in the 'topological' setting).

For a sheaf $S$ (of abelian groups) on a manifold $X$ and each $\varepsilon>0$ we denote by $Z_\varepsilon$ the set of points of $X$ that lie at distance $<\varepsilon$ from $X$. Consider the sheaf $S_\varepsilon:U\mapsto S(U\cap Z_\varepsilon)$, and also the limit sheaf $S_Z=\injlim_{\varepsilon\to 0} S_\varepsilon$. Then for any sheaf $F/X$ we have $Hom(S_Z,F)\cong Hom(i^\ast S,i^\ast F)$, i.e. the functor $W:S\mapsto S_Z$ is the adjoint desired.

My question is: does there exist a 'sheaf-theoretic' description of $W$ (without describing each section of $S_Z$ separately, and without mentioning $Z_\varepsilon$!)? Let $i_\varepsilon$ denote the (open) embedding $Z_\varepsilon\to X$. Then $W$ is the limit of $i_{\varepsilon\ast}i_{\varepsilon}^\ast$. Certainly, the problem would be solved if $i^\ast$ possessed a left adjoint; yet it probably does not. In particular, $W$ cannot factorize through $i_*$ since otherwise $S_Z$ would be zero on $X\setminus Z$ (and this is wrong already for a constant $S$).

Any hints (or references) for dealing with my $W$ would be very welcome! I wouldn't like to introduce any 'infinitesmall' topology here (yet comments in this direction could also be quite interesting).

Some cautions:

  1. $i_{\varepsilon}$ is an open embedding, and not a closed one.

  2. $Z_{\varepsilon}\cap U$ is usually larger than $(Z\cap U)_{\varepsilon}$.

  3. When I speak about sheaves, I only allow coverings by manifolds (and not by infinite disjoint unions of those). $S_Z$ is (always) a sheaf only in this restricted sense (so, it is somewhat pathological). Note that $S_Z(U)=0$ for any $U$ such that its closure is disjoint from $Z$. This does not seem to imply that $S_Z(X\setminus Z)=0$; note that $X\setminus Z$ is not compact!

Restriction of a sheaf to an infinitely small neighbourhood of a closed submanifold: ind-sheaves that almost yield an left adjoint to $i_*i^*$??!!

Let $X$ be a manifold, $i: Z\to X$ is a closed embedding.

For a sheaf $S$ (of abelian groups) on a manifold $X$ and each $\varepsilon>0$ we denote by $Z_\varepsilon$ the set of points of $X$ that lie at distance $<\varepsilon$ from $X$. Consider the sheaf $S_\varepsilon:U\mapsto S(U\cap Z_\varepsilon)$, and also the section-wise limit $S_Z=\injlim_{\varepsilon\to 0} S_\varepsilon$.

I would like to understand the functor $W: S\to S_Z$. Unfortunately, $S_Z$ is only an section-wise injective limit of sheaves; so it does not have to be a sheaf (in the 'usual' sense; note that the topological space $X$ is not noetherian). In particular, the stalk of $S_Z$ at any point $x\notin Z$ is easily seen to be $0$ (since $S_Z(U)=0$ for any $U$ such that its closure is disjoint from $Z$). On the other hand, the section $S_Z(X\setminus Z)$ does not seem to be $0$ (for example, if $S$ is constant); note that $X\setminus Z$ is not compact! See here the answer of algori to the previous version of this question (yesterday I believed that one can call $S_Z$ a sheaf).

Any hints (or references) for dealing with my $W$ would be very welcome! Note that $W$ is the limit of $i_{\varepsilon\ast}i_{\varepsilon}^\ast$. Moreover, it seems that for a sheaf $F/X$ we 'almost have': $Hom(S_Z,F)\cong Hom(i^\ast S,i^\ast F)\cong Hom(S,i_\ast i^\ast F)$, i.e. $W$ is 'almost an adjoint to $i_\ast i^\ast$'. Are there any ideas how to work with such 'weird adjoints'? Possibly, the situation becomes somewhat better when one passes to etale sheaves over algebraic varieties.

added 383 characters in body
Source Link
Mikhail Bondarko
  • 16.9k
  • 4
  • 34
  • 97
Loading
some explanations added
Source Link
Mikhail Bondarko
  • 16.9k
  • 4
  • 34
  • 97
Loading
added 39 characters in body; edited tags
Source Link
Mikhail Bondarko
  • 16.9k
  • 4
  • 34
  • 97
Loading
added 113 characters in body; edited title; deleted 10 characters in body; added 39 characters in body
Source Link
Mikhail Bondarko
  • 16.9k
  • 4
  • 34
  • 97
Loading
added 77 characters in body; edited tags
Source Link
Mikhail Bondarko
  • 16.9k
  • 4
  • 34
  • 97
Loading
Source Link
Mikhail Bondarko
  • 16.9k
  • 4
  • 34
  • 97
Loading