Skip to main content
Commonmark migration
Source Link

In Riemannian geometry, the "lowering indices" operator is denoted by $\flat:TM \to T^*M$ and the "raising indices" operator by $\sharp:T^*M \to TM$. These isomorphisms are sometimes referred to as musical isomorphisms, as stated on [Wikipedia][1]Wikipedia and in [several][2] [other][3] [sources][4]several other sources. Surely, the motivation for such terminology is clear. I would nevertheless like to know who decided to adpot these (rather amusing) notations, so here is a question:

What was the first paper / textbook that made use of the notations $\flat$ and $\sharp$?

and a possible follow-up question:

If such notations were not adopted widely after the first appearance, who popularized them? [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Musical_isomorphism [2]: http://www.math.sunysb.edu/~brweber/401s09/coursefiles/Lecture12.pdf [3]: http://www.math.washington.edu/~chieca/Teaching/Spring11/Materials/Forms.pdf [4]: http://math.uh.edu/~minru/Riemann09/bochnerhodge.pdf

In Riemannian geometry, the "lowering indices" operator is denoted by $\flat:TM \to T^*M$ and the "raising indices" operator by $\sharp:T^*M \to TM$. These isomorphisms are sometimes referred to as musical isomorphisms, as stated on [Wikipedia][1] and in [several][2] [other][3] [sources][4]. Surely, the motivation for such terminology is clear. I would nevertheless like to know who decided to adpot these (rather amusing) notations, so here is a question:

What was the first paper / textbook that made use of the notations $\flat$ and $\sharp$?

and a possible follow-up question:

If such notations were not adopted widely after the first appearance, who popularized them? [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Musical_isomorphism [2]: http://www.math.sunysb.edu/~brweber/401s09/coursefiles/Lecture12.pdf [3]: http://www.math.washington.edu/~chieca/Teaching/Spring11/Materials/Forms.pdf [4]: http://math.uh.edu/~minru/Riemann09/bochnerhodge.pdf

In Riemannian geometry, the "lowering indices" operator is denoted by $\flat:TM \to T^*M$ and the "raising indices" operator by $\sharp:T^*M \to TM$. These isomorphisms are sometimes referred to as musical isomorphisms, as stated on Wikipedia and in several other sources. Surely, the motivation for such terminology is clear. I would nevertheless like to know who decided to adpot these (rather amusing) notations, so here is a question:

What was the first paper / textbook that made use of the notations $\flat$ and $\sharp$?

and a possible follow-up question:

If such notations were not adopted widely after the first appearance, who popularized them?

Source Link

The Origin of the Musical Isomorphisms

In Riemannian geometry, the "lowering indices" operator is denoted by $\flat:TM \to T^*M$ and the "raising indices" operator by $\sharp:T^*M \to TM$. These isomorphisms are sometimes referred to as musical isomorphisms, as stated on [Wikipedia][1] and in [several][2] [other][3] [sources][4]. Surely, the motivation for such terminology is clear. I would nevertheless like to know who decided to adpot these (rather amusing) notations, so here is a question:

What was the first paper / textbook that made use of the notations $\flat$ and $\sharp$?

and a possible follow-up question:

If such notations were not adopted widely after the first appearance, who popularized them? [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Musical_isomorphism [2]: http://www.math.sunysb.edu/~brweber/401s09/coursefiles/Lecture12.pdf [3]: http://www.math.washington.edu/~chieca/Teaching/Spring11/Materials/Forms.pdf [4]: http://math.uh.edu/~minru/Riemann09/bochnerhodge.pdf