Skip to main content
edited tags
Link
gmvh
  • 3.1k
  • 6
  • 27
  • 45
Capitalise title; remaining typo; `{align*}`
Source Link
LSpice
  • 12.9k
  • 4
  • 45
  • 69

character Character sums over prime

Let $\chi$ be be a quadratic character mod $q$. I am interested in finding the best result for how large $N$ should be such that it is guaranteed that

$$\sum_{p=1}^{N} \chi(p) \log p= o(N).$$

I am aware of Heath-Brown's unpublished note, which, assuming the Burgess bound is optimal, proves that:$$\chi(p)=-1 \hspace{5 mm} \text{ for } \hspace{5 mm} q^{1/4\sqrt{e}}< p< q^{1/4},$$ $$\chi(p)=1 \hspace{6 mm} \text{ for } \hspace{5 mm} q^{1/4}< p< q^{1/2\sqrt{e}}.$$\begin{align*} & \chi(p)=-1 & \text{for} && q^{1/4\sqrt{e}}< p< q^{1/4}, \\ & \chi(p)=1 & \text{for} && q^{1/4}< p< q^{1/2\sqrt{e}}. \end{align*}

But it is not clear to me how large the character sum over primes should be to guarantee cancellation. We may asssumeassume there are no Siegel zeros.

character sums over prime

Let $\chi$ be be quadratic character mod $q$. I am interested in finding the best result for how large $N$ should be such that it is guaranteed that

$$\sum_{p=1}^{N} \chi(p) \log p= o(N).$$

I am aware of Heath-Brown's unpublished note, which, assuming the Burgess bound is optimal, proves that:$$\chi(p)=-1 \hspace{5 mm} \text{ for } \hspace{5 mm} q^{1/4\sqrt{e}}< p< q^{1/4},$$ $$\chi(p)=1 \hspace{6 mm} \text{ for } \hspace{5 mm} q^{1/4}< p< q^{1/2\sqrt{e}}.$$

But it is not clear to me how large the character sum over primes should be to guarantee cancellation. We may asssume there are no Siegel zeros.

Character sums over prime

Let $\chi$ be a quadratic character mod $q$. I am interested in finding the best result for how large $N$ should be such that it is guaranteed that

$$\sum_{p=1}^{N} \chi(p) \log p= o(N).$$

I am aware of Heath-Brown's unpublished note, which, assuming the Burgess bound is optimal, proves that: \begin{align*} & \chi(p)=-1 & \text{for} && q^{1/4\sqrt{e}}< p< q^{1/4}, \\ & \chi(p)=1 & \text{for} && q^{1/4}< p< q^{1/2\sqrt{e}}. \end{align*}

But it is not clear to me how large the character sum over primes should be to guarantee cancellation. We may assume there are no Siegel zeros.

fixed typos
Source Link
kodlu
  • 10.4k
  • 2
  • 36
  • 55

charachter character sums over prime

Let $\chi$ be be quadrtic charachetrquadratic character mod $q$. I am interested in finding the best result for how large $N$ should be such that it is guaranteed that

$$\sum_{p=1}^{N} \chi(p) \log p= o(N).$$

I am aware of Heath-Brown's unpublished note, which, assuming the Burgess bound is optimal, proves that:$$\chi(p)=-1 \hspace{5 mm} \text{ for } \hspace{5 mm} q^{1/4\sqrt{e}}< p< q^{1/4},$$ $$\chi(p)=1 \hspace{6 mm} \text{ for } \hspace{5 mm} q^{1/4}< p< q^{1/2\sqrt{e}}.$$

But it is not clear to me how large the character sum over primes should be to guarantee cancellation. We may asssume there are no SieglSiegel zeros.

charachter sums over prime

Let $\chi$ be be quadrtic charachetr mod $q$. I am interested in finding the best result for how large $N$ should be such that it is guaranteed that

$$\sum_{p=1}^{N} \chi(p) \log p= o(N).$$

I am aware of Heath-Brown's unpublished note, which, assuming the Burgess bound is optimal, proves that:$$\chi(p)=-1 \hspace{5 mm} \text{ for } \hspace{5 mm} q^{1/4\sqrt{e}}< p< q^{1/4},$$ $$\chi(p)=1 \hspace{6 mm} \text{ for } \hspace{5 mm} q^{1/4}< p< q^{1/2\sqrt{e}}.$$

But it is not clear to me how large the character sum over primes should be to guarantee cancellation. We may asssume there are no Siegl zeros.

character sums over prime

Let $\chi$ be be quadratic character mod $q$. I am interested in finding the best result for how large $N$ should be such that it is guaranteed that

$$\sum_{p=1}^{N} \chi(p) \log p= o(N).$$

I am aware of Heath-Brown's unpublished note, which, assuming the Burgess bound is optimal, proves that:$$\chi(p)=-1 \hspace{5 mm} \text{ for } \hspace{5 mm} q^{1/4\sqrt{e}}< p< q^{1/4},$$ $$\chi(p)=1 \hspace{6 mm} \text{ for } \hspace{5 mm} q^{1/4}< p< q^{1/2\sqrt{e}}.$$

But it is not clear to me how large the character sum over primes should be to guarantee cancellation. We may asssume there are no Siegel zeros.

Source Link
Loading