Skip to main content
edited body
Source Link
GH from MO
  • 105.4k
  • 8
  • 293
  • 398

There is a basis question which puzzles me for a while. The question is the following:

Let $p$ be a prime and $X\ge 2$. Let $f$ be a $GL_2$-newform of level $p$ and non-trivial nebentypus, with the $n$-th Fourier coefficient being denoted by $a_f(n)$. The how about the explicit estimate for the second moment of the coefficients $a_f(n)$ involving the level aspect? I am especially concerned about the error term in $$\sum_{n\sim X} |a_f(n)|^2=c_f X+\text{Error term}.$$

As far as I know, Farrell brumleyBrumley et al. ( see https://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.06402.pdf) and Keiju Sono (see https://arxiv.org/pdf/2110.01783.pdf) show that $$\sum_{n\sim X} |a_f(n)|^2=c_f X+O(p^{\frac{3}{4}} X^{\frac{3}{4} }),$$ which means that the triial bound holds whenever $p<X^{1/4}$.

So, if any expert here know some more relevant results on this topic. Please show some guides or the corresponding references, many thanks.

Great thanks in advance.

There is a basis question which puzzles me for a while. The question is the following:

Let $p$ be a prime and $X\ge 2$. Let $f$ be a $GL_2$-newform of level $p$ and non-trivial nebentypus, with the $n$-th Fourier coefficient being denoted by $a_f(n)$. The how about the explicit estimate for the second moment of the coefficients $a_f(n)$ involving the level aspect? I am especially concerned about the error term in $$\sum_{n\sim X} |a_f(n)|^2=c_f X+\text{Error term}.$$

As far as I know, Farrell brumley et al. ( see https://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.06402.pdf) and Keiju Sono (see https://arxiv.org/pdf/2110.01783.pdf) show that $$\sum_{n\sim X} |a_f(n)|^2=c_f X+O(p^{\frac{3}{4}} X^{\frac{3}{4} }),$$ which means that the triial bound holds whenever $p<X^{1/4}$.

So, if any expert here know some more relevant results on this topic. Please show some guides or the corresponding references, many thanks.

Great thanks in advance.

There is a basis question which puzzles me for a while. The question is the following:

Let $p$ be a prime and $X\ge 2$. Let $f$ be a $GL_2$-newform of level $p$ and non-trivial nebentypus, with the $n$-th Fourier coefficient being denoted by $a_f(n)$. The how about the explicit estimate for the second moment of the coefficients $a_f(n)$ involving the level aspect? I am especially concerned about the error term in $$\sum_{n\sim X} |a_f(n)|^2=c_f X+\text{Error term}.$$

As far as I know, Farrell Brumley et al. ( see https://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.06402.pdf) and Keiju Sono (see https://arxiv.org/pdf/2110.01783.pdf) show that $$\sum_{n\sim X} |a_f(n)|^2=c_f X+O(p^{\frac{3}{4}} X^{\frac{3}{4} }),$$ which means that the triial bound holds whenever $p<X^{1/4}$.

So, if any expert here know some more relevant results on this topic. Please show some guides or the corresponding references, many thanks.

Great thanks in advance.

Became Hot Network Question
Source Link
hofnumber
  • 563
  • 2
  • 6

The error term for the second moment of Fourier coefficients of cusp forms with the level explicitly determined

There is a basis question which puzzles me for a while. The question is the following:

Let $p$ be a prime and $X\ge 2$. Let $f$ be a $GL_2$-newform of level $p$ and non-trivial nebentypus, with the $n$-th Fourier coefficient being denoted by $a_f(n)$. The how about the explicit estimate for the second moment of the coefficients $a_f(n)$ involving the level aspect? I am especially concerned about the error term in $$\sum_{n\sim X} |a_f(n)|^2=c_f X+\text{Error term}.$$

As far as I know, Farrell brumley et al. ( see https://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.06402.pdf) and Keiju Sono (see https://arxiv.org/pdf/2110.01783.pdf) show that $$\sum_{n\sim X} |a_f(n)|^2=c_f X+O(p^{\frac{3}{4}} X^{\frac{3}{4} }),$$ which means that the triial bound holds whenever $p<X^{1/4}$.

So, if any expert here know some more relevant results on this topic. Please show some guides or the corresponding references, many thanks.

Great thanks in advance.