Skip to main content
added 2 characters in body
Source Link

Consider the Bessel potential and Riesz potential spaces $$L^{s,p}=\{f:f=(I-\Delta)^{s/2}g,\, g\in L^p\},$$$$L^{s,p}=\{f:f=(I-\Delta)^{-s/2}g,\, g\in L^p\},$$ $$\dot{L}^{\alpha,p}=\{f:f=(-\Delta)^{s/2}g,\, g\in L^p\},$$$$\dot{L}^{\alpha,p}=\{f:f=(-\Delta)^{-s/2}g,\, g\in L^p\},$$ where $(I-\Delta)^{s/2}$ and $(-\Delta)^{s/2}$ are the Fourier multipliers with symbol $(1+|\xi|^2)^{s/2}$ and $|\xi|^s$, respectively.

There is a result by A.P. Calderón which states that $L^{s,p}\cong W^{s,p}$ when $s\in\mathbb{N}$ and $1<p<\infty$. My question is, does a similar result hold for $\dot{L}^{s,p}$ and $\dot{W}^{s,p}$?

Actually, the only thing I need to know right now is whether $\dot{L}^{1,2}\cong \dot{H}^{1}$. Formally, it makes all the sense in the world to me, considering Plancherel theorem and how the Fourier transform interacts with derivatives, but I often get surprised by how much the devil is in the details when studying functional analysis.

Consider the Bessel potential and Riesz potential spaces $$L^{s,p}=\{f:f=(I-\Delta)^{s/2}g,\, g\in L^p\},$$ $$\dot{L}^{\alpha,p}=\{f:f=(-\Delta)^{s/2}g,\, g\in L^p\},$$ where $(I-\Delta)^{s/2}$ and $(-\Delta)^{s/2}$ are the Fourier multipliers with symbol $(1+|\xi|^2)^{s/2}$ and $|\xi|^s$, respectively.

There is a result by A.P. Calderón which states that $L^{s,p}\cong W^{s,p}$ when $s\in\mathbb{N}$ and $1<p<\infty$. My question is, does a similar result hold for $\dot{L}^{s,p}$ and $\dot{W}^{s,p}$?

Actually, the only thing I need to know right now is whether $\dot{L}^{1,2}\cong \dot{H}^{1}$. Formally, it makes all the sense in the world to me, considering Plancherel theorem and how the Fourier transform interacts with derivatives, but I often get surprised by how much the devil is in the details when studying functional analysis.

Consider the Bessel potential and Riesz potential spaces $$L^{s,p}=\{f:f=(I-\Delta)^{-s/2}g,\, g\in L^p\},$$ $$\dot{L}^{\alpha,p}=\{f:f=(-\Delta)^{-s/2}g,\, g\in L^p\},$$ where $(I-\Delta)^{s/2}$ and $(-\Delta)^{s/2}$ are the Fourier multipliers with symbol $(1+|\xi|^2)^{s/2}$ and $|\xi|^s$, respectively.

There is a result by A.P. Calderón which states that $L^{s,p}\cong W^{s,p}$ when $s\in\mathbb{N}$ and $1<p<\infty$. My question is, does a similar result hold for $\dot{L}^{s,p}$ and $\dot{W}^{s,p}$?

Actually, the only thing I need to know right now is whether $\dot{L}^{1,2}\cong \dot{H}^{1}$. Formally, it makes all the sense in the world to me, considering Plancherel theorem and how the Fourier transform interacts with derivatives, but I often get surprised by how much the devil is in the details when studying functional analysis.

deleted 30 characters in body
Source Link

Consider the Bessel potential and Riesz potential spaces $$L^{\alpha,p}=\{f:f=(I-\Delta)^{s/2}g,\, g\in L^p\},$$$$L^{s,p}=\{f:f=(I-\Delta)^{s/2}g,\, g\in L^p\},$$ $$\dot{L}^{\alpha,p}=\{f:f=(-\Delta)^{s/2}g,\, g\in L^p\},$$ where $(I-\Delta)^{s/2}$ and $(-\Delta)^{s/2}$ are the Fourier multipliers with symbol $(1+|\xi|^2)^{s/2}$ and $|\xi|^s$, respectively.

There is a result by A.P. Calderón which states that $L^{\alpha,p}\cong W^{\alpha,p}$$L^{s,p}\cong W^{s,p}$ when $\alpha\in\mathbb{N}$$s\in\mathbb{N}$ and $1<p<\infty$. My question is, does a similar result hold for $\dot{L}^{\alpha,p}$$\dot{L}^{s,p}$ and $\dot{W}^{\alpha,p}$$\dot{W}^{s,p}$?

Actually, the only thing I need to know right now is whether $\dot{L}^{1,2}\cong \dot{H}^{1}$. Formally, it makes all the sense in the world to me, considering Plancherel theorem and how the Fourier transform interacts with derivatives, but I often get surprised by how much the devil is in the details when studying functional analysis.

Consider the Bessel potential and Riesz potential spaces $$L^{\alpha,p}=\{f:f=(I-\Delta)^{s/2}g,\, g\in L^p\},$$ $$\dot{L}^{\alpha,p}=\{f:f=(-\Delta)^{s/2}g,\, g\in L^p\},$$ where $(I-\Delta)^{s/2}$ and $(-\Delta)^{s/2}$ are the Fourier multipliers with symbol $(1+|\xi|^2)^{s/2}$ and $|\xi|^s$, respectively.

There is a result by A.P. Calderón which states that $L^{\alpha,p}\cong W^{\alpha,p}$ when $\alpha\in\mathbb{N}$ and $1<p<\infty$. My question is, does a similar result hold for $\dot{L}^{\alpha,p}$ and $\dot{W}^{\alpha,p}$?

Actually, the only thing I need to know right now is whether $\dot{L}^{1,2}\cong \dot{H}^{1}$. Formally, it makes all the sense in the world to me, considering Plancherel theorem and how the Fourier transform interacts with derivatives, but I often get surprised by how much the devil is in the details when studying functional analysis.

Consider the Bessel potential and Riesz potential spaces $$L^{s,p}=\{f:f=(I-\Delta)^{s/2}g,\, g\in L^p\},$$ $$\dot{L}^{\alpha,p}=\{f:f=(-\Delta)^{s/2}g,\, g\in L^p\},$$ where $(I-\Delta)^{s/2}$ and $(-\Delta)^{s/2}$ are the Fourier multipliers with symbol $(1+|\xi|^2)^{s/2}$ and $|\xi|^s$, respectively.

There is a result by A.P. Calderón which states that $L^{s,p}\cong W^{s,p}$ when $s\in\mathbb{N}$ and $1<p<\infty$. My question is, does a similar result hold for $\dot{L}^{s,p}$ and $\dot{W}^{s,p}$?

Actually, the only thing I need to know right now is whether $\dot{L}^{1,2}\cong \dot{H}^{1}$. Formally, it makes all the sense in the world to me, considering Plancherel theorem and how the Fourier transform interacts with derivatives, but I often get surprised by how much the devil is in the details when studying functional analysis.

Source Link

Riesz potential and homogeneous Sobolev spaces

Consider the Bessel potential and Riesz potential spaces $$L^{\alpha,p}=\{f:f=(I-\Delta)^{s/2}g,\, g\in L^p\},$$ $$\dot{L}^{\alpha,p}=\{f:f=(-\Delta)^{s/2}g,\, g\in L^p\},$$ where $(I-\Delta)^{s/2}$ and $(-\Delta)^{s/2}$ are the Fourier multipliers with symbol $(1+|\xi|^2)^{s/2}$ and $|\xi|^s$, respectively.

There is a result by A.P. Calderón which states that $L^{\alpha,p}\cong W^{\alpha,p}$ when $\alpha\in\mathbb{N}$ and $1<p<\infty$. My question is, does a similar result hold for $\dot{L}^{\alpha,p}$ and $\dot{W}^{\alpha,p}$?

Actually, the only thing I need to know right now is whether $\dot{L}^{1,2}\cong \dot{H}^{1}$. Formally, it makes all the sense in the world to me, considering Plancherel theorem and how the Fourier transform interacts with derivatives, but I often get surprised by how much the devil is in the details when studying functional analysis.