Skip to main content
TeX
Source Link
LSpice
  • 12.9k
  • 4
  • 45
  • 69

Let $A_1, \cdots A_N$$A_1, \dotsc A_N$ be a collection of finite Hermitian matrices that commute with one another and all have the matrix $2-$$2$-norm as $1$. Here $N$ is large but fixed.

Then, they are simultaneously diagonalizable with real entries. BUT, what if I add a small perturbation to them, in the form

   $A_i +\epsilon B_i$ where $i=1,\cdots, N$, $0<\epsilon <<1$$0<\epsilon \ll1$ and $B_i$'s are arbitrary matrices of $2-$$2$-norms being all $1$.

I have an intuition from physics (quantum mechanics) that if $\epsilon$ is sufficiently small compared to $1$ and depending on $N$, the perturbations $\epsilon B_i$ would not hurt the good properties of $A_i$'s. These properties would be simultaneous diagonalizability and functional calculus based on functions of real variables.

However, I cannot find a relevant theorem or reference to this issue.

Could anyone please help me?

Let $A_1, \cdots A_N$ be a collection of finite Hermitian matrices that commute with one another and all have the matrix $2-$norm as $1$. Here $N$ is large but fixed.

Then, they are simultaneously diagonalizable with real entries. BUT, what if I add a small perturbation to them, in the form

 $A_i +\epsilon B_i$ where $i=1,\cdots, N$, $0<\epsilon <<1$ and $B_i$'s are arbitrary matrices of $2-$norms being all $1$.

I have an intuition from physics (quantum mechanics) that if $\epsilon$ is sufficiently small compared to $1$ and depending on $N$, the perturbations $\epsilon B_i$ would not hurt the good properties of $A_i$'s. These properties would be simultaneous diagonalizability and functional calculus based on functions of real variables.

However, I cannot find a relevant theorem or reference to this issue.

Could anyone please help me?

Let $A_1, \dotsc A_N$ be a collection of finite Hermitian matrices that commute with one another and all have the matrix $2$-norm as $1$. Here $N$ is large but fixed.

Then, they are simultaneously diagonalizable with real entries. BUT, what if I add a small perturbation to them, in the form  $A_i +\epsilon B_i$ where $i=1,\cdots, N$, $0<\epsilon \ll1$ and $B_i$'s are arbitrary matrices of $2$-norms being all $1$.

I have an intuition from physics (quantum mechanics) that if $\epsilon$ is sufficiently small compared to $1$ and depending on $N$, the perturbations $\epsilon B_i$ would not hurt the good properties of $A_i$'s. These properties would be simultaneous diagonalizability and functional calculus based on functions of real variables.

However, I cannot find a relevant theorem or reference to this issue.

Could anyone please help me?

Source Link
Isaac
  • 3.5k
  • 16
  • 22

Small perturbation to a commuting family of hermitian matrices will hurt the nice properties?

Let $A_1, \cdots A_N$ be a collection of finite Hermitian matrices that commute with one another and all have the matrix $2-$norm as $1$. Here $N$ is large but fixed.

Then, they are simultaneously diagonalizable with real entries. BUT, what if I add a small perturbation to them, in the form

$A_i +\epsilon B_i$ where $i=1,\cdots, N$, $0<\epsilon <<1$ and $B_i$'s are arbitrary matrices of $2-$norms being all $1$.

I have an intuition from physics (quantum mechanics) that if $\epsilon$ is sufficiently small compared to $1$ and depending on $N$, the perturbations $\epsilon B_i$ would not hurt the good properties of $A_i$'s. These properties would be simultaneous diagonalizability and functional calculus based on functions of real variables.

However, I cannot find a relevant theorem or reference to this issue.

Could anyone please help me?