Skip to main content
`\eqref`
Source Link
LSpice
  • 12.9k
  • 4
  • 45
  • 69

Bäcklund transformations may be used also in ODE to solve non-linear problems; for instance, it's well known that for the equation

$$ \begin{align} \frac{\mathrm{d}^2\omega}{\mathrm{d}t^2}=\sin\omega \tag{*} \end{align} $$$$ \frac{\mathrm{d}^2\omega}{\mathrm{d}t^2}=\sin\omega \tag{*}\label{star} $$

we can define the transformation

$$ \begin{align} \frac{\mathrm{d}\omega}{\mathrm{d}t}-i\frac{\mathrm{d}\tau}{\mathrm{d}t}=2e^{i\lambda}\sin\left(\frac{\omega+i\tau}{2} \right) \end{align}, $$$$ \frac{\mathrm{d}\omega}{\mathrm{d}t}-i\frac{\mathrm{d}\tau}{\mathrm{d}t}=2e^{i\lambda}\sin\left(\frac{\omega+i\tau}{2} \right), $$

with $\tau(t)$ satisfying

$$ \begin{align} \frac{\mathrm{d}^2\tau}{\mathrm{d}t^2}=\sinh\tau, \end{align} $$$$ \frac{\mathrm{d}^2\tau}{\mathrm{d}t^2}=\sinh\tau, $$

and then (for any $\lambda$) with some choice of $\tau$ ($\tau=0$ in particular) we may find a solution for $\omega$. This works relatively easy because the equation (*)\eqref{star} is an autonomous equation, i.e., it does not contain the independent variable explicitly. On the other hand, if we consider

$$ \begin{align} \frac{\mathrm{d}^2\omega}{\mathrm{d}t^2}=t\cdot\sin\omega \tag{**} \end{align} $$$$ \frac{\mathrm{d}^2\omega}{\mathrm{d}t^2}=t\cdot\sin\omega \tag{**}\label{starstar} $$

(or equations with any "forcing" $f(t)$ other that $f(t)=t$) the equation is no longer autonomous and it's not at all evident how to construct a Bäcklund transformation analogous to that of (*)\eqref{star}. (I'm assuming this method may help to solve the equation, which appears when considering some problems of deformations of elastic membranes.) The question is then how to construct a transformation that may help to solve (**)\eqref{starstar} analytically in terms of $\omega(t_0)$ and $\omega'(t_0)$, with $t_0$ some fixed real.

Bäcklund transformations may be used also in ODE to solve non-linear problems; for instance, it's well known that for the equation

$$ \begin{align} \frac{\mathrm{d}^2\omega}{\mathrm{d}t^2}=\sin\omega \tag{*} \end{align} $$

we can define the transformation

$$ \begin{align} \frac{\mathrm{d}\omega}{\mathrm{d}t}-i\frac{\mathrm{d}\tau}{\mathrm{d}t}=2e^{i\lambda}\sin\left(\frac{\omega+i\tau}{2} \right) \end{align}, $$

with $\tau(t)$ satisfying

$$ \begin{align} \frac{\mathrm{d}^2\tau}{\mathrm{d}t^2}=\sinh\tau, \end{align} $$

and then (for any $\lambda$) with some choice of $\tau$ ($\tau=0$ in particular) we may find a solution for $\omega$. This works relatively easy because the equation (*) is an autonomous equation, i.e., it does not contain the independent variable explicitly. On the other hand, if we consider

$$ \begin{align} \frac{\mathrm{d}^2\omega}{\mathrm{d}t^2}=t\cdot\sin\omega \tag{**} \end{align} $$

(or equations with any "forcing" $f(t)$ other that $f(t)=t$) the equation is no longer autonomous and it's not at all evident how to construct a Bäcklund transformation analogous to that of (*). (I'm assuming this method may help to solve the equation, which appears when considering some problems of deformations of elastic membranes.) The question is then how to construct a transformation that may help to solve (**) analytically in terms of $\omega(t_0)$ and $\omega'(t_0)$, with $t_0$ some fixed real.

Bäcklund transformations may be used also in ODE to solve non-linear problems; for instance, it's well known that for the equation

$$ \frac{\mathrm{d}^2\omega}{\mathrm{d}t^2}=\sin\omega \tag{*}\label{star} $$

we can define the transformation

$$ \frac{\mathrm{d}\omega}{\mathrm{d}t}-i\frac{\mathrm{d}\tau}{\mathrm{d}t}=2e^{i\lambda}\sin\left(\frac{\omega+i\tau}{2} \right), $$

with $\tau(t)$ satisfying

$$ \frac{\mathrm{d}^2\tau}{\mathrm{d}t^2}=\sinh\tau, $$

and then (for any $\lambda$) with some choice of $\tau$ ($\tau=0$ in particular) we may find a solution for $\omega$. This works relatively easy because the equation \eqref{star} is an autonomous equation, i.e., it does not contain the independent variable explicitly. On the other hand, if we consider

$$ \frac{\mathrm{d}^2\omega}{\mathrm{d}t^2}=t\cdot\sin\omega \tag{**}\label{starstar} $$

(or equations with any "forcing" $f(t)$ other that $f(t)=t$) the equation is no longer autonomous and it's not at all evident how to construct a Bäcklund transformation analogous to that of \eqref{star}. (I'm assuming this method may help to solve the equation, which appears when considering some problems of deformations of elastic membranes.) The question is then how to construct a transformation that may help to solve \eqref{starstar} analytically in terms of $\omega(t_0)$ and $\omega'(t_0)$, with $t_0$ some fixed real.

fixed two typos
Source Link
F. C.
  • 3.6k
  • 21
  • 30

Generalising Bäcklund tranformtransform to solve $\omega''(t)=t\sin\omega(t)$

Bäcklund tranformationstransformations may be used also in ODE to solve non-linear problems; for instance, it's well known that for the equation

$$ \begin{align} \frac{\mathrm{d}^2\omega}{\mathrm{d}t^2}=\sin\omega \tag{*} \end{align} $$

we can define the transformation

$$ \begin{align} \frac{\mathrm{d}\omega}{\mathrm{d}t}-i\frac{\mathrm{d}\tau}{\mathrm{d}t}=2e^{i\lambda}\sin\left(\frac{\omega+i\tau}{2} \right) \end{align}, $$

with $\tau(t)$ satisfying

$$ \begin{align} \frac{\mathrm{d}^2\tau}{\mathrm{d}t^2}=\sinh\tau, \end{align} $$

and then (for any $\lambda$) with some choice of $\tau$ ($\tau=0$ in particular) we may find a solution for $\omega$. This works relatively easy because the equation (*) is an autonomous equation, i.e., it does not contain the independent variable explicitly. On the other hand, if we consider

$$ \begin{align} \frac{\mathrm{d}^2\omega}{\mathrm{d}t^2}=t\cdot\sin\omega \tag{**} \end{align} $$

(or equations with any "forcing" $f(t)$ other that $f(t)=t$) the equation is no longer autonomous and it's not at all evident how to construct a Bäcklund transformation analogous to that of (*). (I'm assuming this method may help to solve the equation, which appears when considering some problems of deformations of elastic membranes.) The question is then how to construct a transformation that may help to solve (**) analytically in terms of $\omega(t_0)$ and $\omega'(t_0)$, with $t_0$ some fixed real.

Generalising Bäcklund tranform to solve $\omega''(t)=t\sin\omega(t)$

Bäcklund tranformations may be used also in ODE to solve non-linear problems; for instance, it's well known that for the equation

$$ \begin{align} \frac{\mathrm{d}^2\omega}{\mathrm{d}t^2}=\sin\omega \tag{*} \end{align} $$

we can define the transformation

$$ \begin{align} \frac{\mathrm{d}\omega}{\mathrm{d}t}-i\frac{\mathrm{d}\tau}{\mathrm{d}t}=2e^{i\lambda}\sin\left(\frac{\omega+i\tau}{2} \right) \end{align}, $$

with $\tau(t)$ satisfying

$$ \begin{align} \frac{\mathrm{d}^2\tau}{\mathrm{d}t^2}=\sinh\tau, \end{align} $$

and then (for any $\lambda$) with some choice of $\tau$ ($\tau=0$ in particular) we may find a solution for $\omega$. This works relatively easy because the equation (*) is an autonomous equation, i.e., it does not contain the independent variable explicitly. On the other hand, if we consider

$$ \begin{align} \frac{\mathrm{d}^2\omega}{\mathrm{d}t^2}=t\cdot\sin\omega \tag{**} \end{align} $$

(or equations with any "forcing" $f(t)$ other that $f(t)=t$) the equation is no longer autonomous and it's not at all evident how to construct a Bäcklund transformation analogous to that of (*). (I'm assuming this method may help to solve the equation, which appears when considering some problems of deformations of elastic membranes.) The question is then how to construct a transformation that may help to solve (**) analytically in terms of $\omega(t_0)$ and $\omega'(t_0)$, with $t_0$ some fixed real.

Generalising Bäcklund transform to solve $\omega''(t)=t\sin\omega(t)$

Bäcklund transformations may be used also in ODE to solve non-linear problems; for instance, it's well known that for the equation

$$ \begin{align} \frac{\mathrm{d}^2\omega}{\mathrm{d}t^2}=\sin\omega \tag{*} \end{align} $$

we can define the transformation

$$ \begin{align} \frac{\mathrm{d}\omega}{\mathrm{d}t}-i\frac{\mathrm{d}\tau}{\mathrm{d}t}=2e^{i\lambda}\sin\left(\frac{\omega+i\tau}{2} \right) \end{align}, $$

with $\tau(t)$ satisfying

$$ \begin{align} \frac{\mathrm{d}^2\tau}{\mathrm{d}t^2}=\sinh\tau, \end{align} $$

and then (for any $\lambda$) with some choice of $\tau$ ($\tau=0$ in particular) we may find a solution for $\omega$. This works relatively easy because the equation (*) is an autonomous equation, i.e., it does not contain the independent variable explicitly. On the other hand, if we consider

$$ \begin{align} \frac{\mathrm{d}^2\omega}{\mathrm{d}t^2}=t\cdot\sin\omega \tag{**} \end{align} $$

(or equations with any "forcing" $f(t)$ other that $f(t)=t$) the equation is no longer autonomous and it's not at all evident how to construct a Bäcklund transformation analogous to that of (*). (I'm assuming this method may help to solve the equation, which appears when considering some problems of deformations of elastic membranes.) The question is then how to construct a transformation that may help to solve (**) analytically in terms of $\omega(t_0)$ and $\omega'(t_0)$, with $t_0$ some fixed real.

Notice removed Draw attention by CommunityBot
Bounty Ended with no winning answer by CommunityBot
Notice added Draw attention by Daniel Castro
Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by Daniel Castro
Source Link

Generalising Bäcklund tranform to solve $\omega''(t)=t\sin\omega(t)$

Bäcklund tranformations may be used also in ODE to solve non-linear problems; for instance, it's well known that for the equation

$$ \begin{align} \frac{\mathrm{d}^2\omega}{\mathrm{d}t^2}=\sin\omega \tag{*} \end{align} $$

we can define the transformation

$$ \begin{align} \frac{\mathrm{d}\omega}{\mathrm{d}t}-i\frac{\mathrm{d}\tau}{\mathrm{d}t}=2e^{i\lambda}\sin\left(\frac{\omega+i\tau}{2} \right) \end{align}, $$

with $\tau(t)$ satisfying

$$ \begin{align} \frac{\mathrm{d}^2\tau}{\mathrm{d}t^2}=\sinh\tau, \end{align} $$

and then (for any $\lambda$) with some choice of $\tau$ ($\tau=0$ in particular) we may find a solution for $\omega$. This works relatively easy because the equation (*) is an autonomous equation, i.e., it does not contain the independent variable explicitly. On the other hand, if we consider

$$ \begin{align} \frac{\mathrm{d}^2\omega}{\mathrm{d}t^2}=t\cdot\sin\omega \tag{**} \end{align} $$

(or equations with any "forcing" $f(t)$ other that $f(t)=t$) the equation is no longer autonomous and it's not at all evident how to construct a Bäcklund transformation analogous to that of (*). (I'm assuming this method may help to solve the equation, which appears when considering some problems of deformations of elastic membranes.) The question is then how to construct a transformation that may help to solve (**) analytically in terms of $\omega(t_0)$ and $\omega'(t_0)$, with $t_0$ some fixed real.