Skip to main content
edited tags
Link
Nate River
  • 6.2k
  • 2
  • 23
  • 99
Notice removed Draw attention by Nate River
Bounty Ended with fedja's answer chosen by Nate River
Notice added Draw attention by Nate River
Bounty Started worth 100 reputation by Nate River
added 132 characters in body
Source Link
Nate River
  • 6.2k
  • 2
  • 23
  • 99

Let $f_i \in L^1 ([0, 1])$ be a sequence of functions equibounded in $L^1$ norm - that is, there exists some $M > 0$ such that $\|f_i\|_{L^1} < M$.

Define the functional $F: L^1([0, 1]) \to \mathbb R$ by

$$F(h) = \limsup_{i \to \infty} \|f_i - h\|_{L^1}.$$

Question: Does this functional admit a minimiser? Is the minimiser unique whenever it exists?

Remarks:

What I have tried so far is to attempt to apply the direct method of the calculus of variations.

Since the $f_i$ are equibounded in $L^1$, it can be shown that $F$ is coercive, thus any minimising sequence is bounded in $L^1$ norm. In particular we have a weakly-* converging subsequence, say $h_n \overset{*}{\to} h$.

The result would follow if we had weak-* sequential lower semi continuity of $F$ at the minimiser - that is, that

$$\liminf_{n \to \infty} F(h_n) \geq F(h).$$

I could neither disprove this with a counterexample, nor prove it in generality.

Edit: As pointed out in the comments, weak-$*$ convergence to an $L^1$ function isn’t guaranteed, only convergence to a measure.

Let $f_i \in L^1 ([0, 1])$ be a sequence of functions equibounded in $L^1$ norm - that is, there exists some $M > 0$ such that $\|f_i\|_{L^1} < M$.

Define the functional $F: L^1([0, 1]) \to \mathbb R$ by

$$F(h) = \limsup_{i \to \infty} \|f_i - h\|_{L^1}.$$

Question: Does this functional admit a minimiser? Is the minimiser unique whenever it exists?

Remarks:

What I have tried so far is to attempt to apply the direct method of the calculus of variations.

Since the $f_i$ are equibounded in $L^1$, it can be shown that $F$ is coercive, thus any minimising sequence is bounded in $L^1$ norm. In particular we have a weakly-* converging subsequence, say $h_n \overset{*}{\to} h$.

The result would follow if we had weak-* sequential lower semi continuity of $F$ at the minimiser - that is, that

$$\liminf_{n \to \infty} F(h_n) \geq F(h).$$

I could neither disprove this with a counterexample, nor prove it in generality.

Let $f_i \in L^1 ([0, 1])$ be a sequence of functions equibounded in $L^1$ norm - that is, there exists some $M > 0$ such that $\|f_i\|_{L^1} < M$.

Define the functional $F: L^1([0, 1]) \to \mathbb R$ by

$$F(h) = \limsup_{i \to \infty} \|f_i - h\|_{L^1}.$$

Question: Does this functional admit a minimiser? Is the minimiser unique whenever it exists?

Remarks:

What I have tried so far is to attempt to apply the direct method of the calculus of variations.

Since the $f_i$ are equibounded in $L^1$, it can be shown that $F$ is coercive, thus any minimising sequence is bounded in $L^1$ norm. In particular we have a weakly-* converging subsequence, say $h_n \overset{*}{\to} h$.

The result would follow if we had weak-* sequential lower semi continuity of $F$ at the minimiser - that is, that

$$\liminf_{n \to \infty} F(h_n) \geq F(h).$$

I could neither disprove this with a counterexample, nor prove it in generality.

Edit: As pointed out in the comments, weak-$*$ convergence to an $L^1$ function isn’t guaranteed, only convergence to a measure.

Source Link
Nate River
  • 6.2k
  • 2
  • 23
  • 99

Minimiser of a certain functional

Let $f_i \in L^1 ([0, 1])$ be a sequence of functions equibounded in $L^1$ norm - that is, there exists some $M > 0$ such that $\|f_i\|_{L^1} < M$.

Define the functional $F: L^1([0, 1]) \to \mathbb R$ by

$$F(h) = \limsup_{i \to \infty} \|f_i - h\|_{L^1}.$$

Question: Does this functional admit a minimiser? Is the minimiser unique whenever it exists?

Remarks:

What I have tried so far is to attempt to apply the direct method of the calculus of variations.

Since the $f_i$ are equibounded in $L^1$, it can be shown that $F$ is coercive, thus any minimising sequence is bounded in $L^1$ norm. In particular we have a weakly-* converging subsequence, say $h_n \overset{*}{\to} h$.

The result would follow if we had weak-* sequential lower semi continuity of $F$ at the minimiser - that is, that

$$\liminf_{n \to \infty} F(h_n) \geq F(h).$$

I could neither disprove this with a counterexample, nor prove it in generality.