Skip to main content
MathOverflow

Return to Question

added 13 characters in body
Source Link
The Thin Whistler
The Thin Whistler
  • 1.8k
  • 12
  • 23

On page 4 of Nitin Nitsure's paper Construction of Hilbert and Quot Schemes, the author refers to the fact that Hilbert polynomials are indeed polynomials as

a special case of Snapper's Lemma, see "An Intersection Theory for Divisors (preprint 1994)" by Steven Kleiman for a proof.

Kleiman's paper (or book?) mentioned by Nitsure must have either changed its title, never gone into publication, or elsehow disappeared, since I am unable to find it. Does anybody have a link, or an alternative source for the proof?

Thanks in advance.

On page 4 of Nitin Nitsure's paper Construction of Hilbert and Quot Schemes, the author refers to the fact that Hilbert polynomials are indeed polynomials as

a special case of Snapper's Lemma, see "An Intersection Theory for Divisors (preprint 1994)" by Steven Kleiman for a proof.

Kleiman's paper (or book?) mentioned by Nitsure must have changed its title, never gone into publication, or elsehow disappeared, I am unable to find it. Does anybody have a link, or an alternative source for the proof?

Thanks in advance.

On page 4 of Nitin Nitsure's paper Construction of Hilbert and Quot Schemes, the author refers to the fact that Hilbert polynomials are indeed polynomials as

a special case of Snapper's Lemma, see "An Intersection Theory for Divisors (preprint 1994)" by Steven Kleiman for a proof.

Kleiman's paper (or book?) mentioned by Nitsure must have either changed its title, never gone into publication, or elsehow disappeared, since I am unable to find it. Does anybody have a link, or an alternative source for the proof?

Thanks in advance.

Became Hot Network Question
Source Link
The Thin Whistler
The Thin Whistler
  • 1.8k
  • 12
  • 23

Reference request: Kleiman's proof of Snapper's Lemma

On page 4 of Nitin Nitsure's paper Construction of Hilbert and Quot Schemes, the author refers to the fact that Hilbert polynomials are indeed polynomials as

a special case of Snapper's Lemma, see "An Intersection Theory for Divisors (preprint 1994)" by Steven Kleiman for a proof.

Kleiman's paper (or book?) mentioned by Nitsure must have changed its title, never gone into publication, or elsehow disappeared, I am unable to find it. Does anybody have a link, or an alternative source for the proof?

Thanks in advance.